:DDDDDDDDD
Day 497, 12:31
•
Published in Romania 
•
by
•
by Mr Woldy
Post your comment
What is this?
You are reading an article written by a citizen of eRepublik, an immersive multiplayer strategy game based on real life countries. Create your own character and help your country achieve its glory while establishing yourself as a war hero, renowned publisher or finance guru.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
"However, Germany did not have control over the Tyrol region, and if they gained control it would annex Austria, allowing the Hungarians to take over Burgenland. This increased the cost to start a resistance war or re-declare war on Austria. Needless expenses caused by a careless move by Quicksilver. It is thought that Quicksilver intended to keep the Burgenland region all along."
This part is patently untrue. The contract did allow Hungary to take controll of Burgenland and train there. The contract specified a 2-3 week long campaign for Germany, thereby giving Hungary ample time to train the people. But Germany for some reason hurried up the process and started to haggle us to return Burgenland; even though they knew that we have a much more important war going on, so the RW then would split our forces - in retrospective, I think that was their reason for it, because they already dallied with Atlantis (I know this from Swedish sources), and probably wanted to please them by this move. Despite of this I personally started the RW and in all government communications we asked the population to fight in the more important war, and let the Germans pull down the wall - as we agreed in our negotiations on the chat. It is not my fault that some Hungarians felt cheated by Germany's move and some foreign tanks did not know what to do in the RW - so Burgenland remained with Hungary ever since to remind us for the not-so-good-will of the Germans - or I should correctly name it, their double-play, by which they cheated PEACE and Hungary as well.
Yes quicksilver you always have the right explanation, don't you?
You know it very well that not giving Burgenland back is a theft and a thief will always shout "thief" to others.
Propaganda is one thing, but starting to really believe in propaganda is something else
yesterday someone from hungary say that Romania was The Puppet Master of eWorld.
now, i ask u quicksilver... the Hungary is The Master of TO ?
i think now all the country in the eWorld see how Hungary betray his agreement with Austria and Germany.
So i think, now Atlantis is the PEACEMAKER in the eWorld.
Peace by occupying everyone, right?
I lived some years in a similar peace in RL that lasted 50 years and had enough 🙂
When Romania gives back all the foreign territories to their original owners I believe Atlantis want peace indeed.
hungary don't deserve to stay in europe...
we see what u do in ukraina (TO), norway (TO attempt) and now u destroy the alliance between Austria and Germany.
Germany annexed a PEACE country Austria, and then joined Atlantis.
And they are wondering why is PEACE upset?
Hillarious...
Btw Romania doesnt deserve to stay in the civlised Europe.
We see what they did in Ukraine(annexed), Russia(TO-d annexed), Pakistan(To-ed, destroyed), Chile(just robbed)...
@Dece - what happened in Russia and Pakistan?
The sentence "When that happens Hungary will finish the military training and give up Burgenland to Germany." means that Hungary would have had to give up Burgenland to Germany, and not to Austria.
Therefore, I could not understand why Qucksilver started an RW in Burgenland? Because the Germans requested it? On what basis? They should have declared war on Hungary, should have attacked Burgenland, and Hungary should have given up Burgenland on the basis of the contract. Would have this cost too much gold?
Then why did they sign the contract with such a wording?
Quicksilver showed too much goodwill by starting the RW, and Germany showed no goodwill.
If the contracting presidents wanted to do otherwise, then they should have signed a proper text.
Until I got to your second comment I thought you were actually going to make a point but when I read this:
"They should have declared war on Hungary, should have attacked Burgenland, and Hungary should have given up Burgenland on the basis of the contract"
I realised you have no ideea of how the game mechanics work. Congratulations on the huge copy/paste out of which you understand nothing.
Thank you for your reply.
If you say I have no idea of how the game mechanism work, perhaps you should explain what you exactly mean.
Too much cost of declaration of war, or of starting a battle? Activation of MPPs?
On the other han😛 I hope you do not say that giving up Burgenland to Germany is done by giving it up to Austria. Even if Germany was planning to conquer all the regions of Austria. If you say that Hungary broke the contract, then you should also accept the wording of the contract for your reasoning.
Here is the link to the contract to prove that Quicksilver's "2-3 weeks" is an invention and a patent lie:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/forum/topic/87320/contract-between-germany-austria-and-hungary/1
Quote from the contract:
"After the declaration of war is voted both parties take the regions according to their plans; the whole military exercise should take a minimum of THREE DAYS to give enough opportunity to fight."
She is *lying* right to your face!
Voted, totaly true. Hungary cheat us regarding Burgenland. Now they cry, because we don´t join Peace. I must every time laught about this. Who whants to stay with cheaters at the same place? Nobody can trust them anymore.
;_;