PTOing BP
Day 4,167, 00:47
•
Published in United Kingdom 
•
by
•
by Rusofil74
Dear fellow citizens,
I decided on this article for the events and results of the recently held elections for the President of the Party. As you know, my party (British Patriots) has tried to refresh the British population and increase the number of its members in the past two months by approving passports to various players of our e-world. This is e-Uk, accompanied by attacks on the party, groundless claims that we are preparing the PTO of the state, both in the public chat, in the state chat, as well as in the Congress messages. I was also against the bringing of anyone, but it should be done with planning and with certain priorities (exp.lvl, combat and activity ), and for those reasons, I was concerned with approving non-verified acc.
In the previous elections for the President of the State, we did not have our candidate, but we gave support to a member of the second party, not because we think that we do not have the staff who would do the job well, but to avoid any possible and unfounded attacks that we are trying to do with the PTO of the state.
The events during the party elections showed the willingness of all parties to give their actions to legitimacy to the PTO and to implement them when they despise them.
In our party until the election there were 45 members with already inserted individuals from other parties in order to increase the number of members during the election to 51, which leads to a clear conclusion that by their actions the legitimate right was that each party choose its president in a fair way.
We strengthen our party with active players and not multi acc as individual parties in our country. We will honor these election results because we do not have other options and continue to work on strengthening our society, but by this way, I draw the attention of the public to the fact that there was a PTO and that it was applied by those who claimed to us that this is our only goal and that's why we're here.
So next time, if someone tells you to move from your own to another party and vote on the orders of your superiors, then you do PTO on that occasion and you lose the right to accuse someone next time if you happen to such a situation.
Ask self where this can all take us
Best regards,
Yours
Rusofil74
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Here is the problem.
You advertised as a growing, active, strong party dedicated to improving the UK's military strength. That was the attraction for me and to digress into an egotistical diversion - I'm quite the catch!
I'm the strongest UKer (as evidenced in my coup) have a wide degree of contacts with strong fighters, experience in building up party structures and resisting the diabolical schemes of the 'elites'. Instead I was censored, criticised and ignored by the previous party regime!
So back on topic - If you advertise well, come up with a coherent vision and actually recruit strong and active players then you will get players that have their own ideas, takes on the vision and proposals on how best to get there. In short your vision and party has to change as you grow as we are long past the point where you could recruit from new players and mould them into loyalists.
Every new party that came after the oldfag one's has had to adapt and the leaders have had to know that they will eventually lose their personal power to the 'new wave' of members or you just end up with a party run by one or two players directing a graveyard of banked votes (which is when PTO's become a real, national risk
You had the latter but you decided to grow which means you have to accept the former.
It's my hope that the party will continue on its current path and trajectory and that rather then bitching about the loss of personal power that the 'elders' are willing to stick around (unlike MG) and direct the conversation and introduce new schemes such as a UK MU that rivals/offers as much as my current MU thus allowing me to switch back home.
TL😉R Every party gets 'PTO'd' every time it adds members and elects leaders.
Of course, I am aware of how problems are solved in a political module, the article I wrote is just an informative character and an attempt to draw attention to the hypocrisy of individuals. BP continues with its existence and we are more determined than ever to continue to work on strengthening the party and the entire society. To make e-UK even stronger. no one will be denied the right to write on the party wall and I'm sorry it happened earlier
But as you recorded the party surged to 51 members and 49 remain so it's not a question of people popping in, voting for 'x' for the lulz' and then running back to wherever they came.
Right now you've got a leader elected in a fair vote (admin didnt overturn) by current members.
Certainly, therefore, we continue to work where we care before the election. He himself is an old party member and is an active player, but the fact that individuals from other parties have disturbed the election will of their members by their arrival and voting for him. I think it was easier for them to give votes to him because he was closer to the number of votes won than to vote for his deposited candidates (King Migueles I from the TUP, BennyFPS from the UK Reform Party)
[removed]
In a lot of cases it's opinion based but against your stats...................it's not!
[removed]
This game is a wargame and therefore your shit stats have a very direct bearing on your worth.
You could ofc compensate by being a constructive organiser or planner............you don't
You could be one of the top tax sources.............you ain't
You could of concentrated on the Air Rounds when they came in to increase your use...........You didn't.
Your voice adds nothing to this debate as all you've said is that I have a hella big ego and that's been said a hundred times over by players of all stripes and with very much more involvement in the game.
[removed]
You joined the game over 3 years ago.
In that time what have you done?
Founded/Run parties?
Founded/Run MU's?
Established a range of Companies?
Been a minister?
I'd done all these and more in my first 3 years and that was with a lot more competition in terms of players willing to do stuff.
Any new player (as you seem to think yourself) who'd be willing to do almost anything other then click would have a massive impact in todays game let alone in the UK...............you have none.
That's not my fault for being super awesome and somehow throwing shade on you - It's your fault for being a lazy bugger.
[removed]
[removed]
It is a game and you suck at it.
Dunno why you bother even playing if your sum contribution for the time given is as sparse as it is?
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
Not sure what your gender has to do with the issue unless you are claiming "Females should be entitled to carte blanche"?
I'm also doubtful whether you are a girl although I'm 100% convinced you are no lady.
[removed]
Exactly - You were the one who decided to raise gender for..............reasons
Still not sure why you being 'X', 'Y' or some other variant was specific and crucial to your argument/rant but apparently it was and evidently so is mine based on your assumption of my own gender.
[removed]
> "I mentioned you're afraid of a girl"
> "Now you're making it about gender and reaching to say that i did."
So you did introduce gender into the rant but clearly I did and it's now my fault for saying you did even though you did as you clearly didn't despite saying you did?
[removed]
Your words >"Afraid of a girl that you need to report her?"
So just to clarify and maybe end your gender interjection, are you;
A) Mocking me for being afraid of a girl or even girls.
or
😎 Accusing me of displaying ungentlemanly behaviour (reporting) towards girls.
[removed]
So much for clarity!
[removed]
We've already established that your account is weak. Your real strength seems to lie in contradictory argumentation and convulsions of logic.
You should team up with Keithypoo
[removed]
[removed]
Big problem here was that their saviour was Pargali, and with his history, no one associated with him would have been trustworthy...
And as Pargali told me, Rusofil will understan😛 "A reforme mogu samo s novim ljudima koje ću postavit kad poizbacim stare konjine, za sad je omjer 25 njih na nešto malo nas"
[removed]
Join Civil Society:
https://www.erepublik.com/en/party/civil-society-5641/1
Cause, we are NEW, we are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT, we have NO SKELETON leftovers in our wardrobes.
WE ARE THE BREATH OF FRESH AIR!
but whats the actual plan/point of the party or is that to follow in a new article?
It's coming, it's coming...I'm coming...
Ooh ah, just a little bit by Gina G
www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiLw45oAuD0
We are like the stormwind
It's kind of funny what you mentioned above:
"I'm the strongest UKer (as evidenced in my coup) have a wide degree of contacts with strong fighters, experience in building up party structures and resisting the diabolical schemes of the 'elites'."
Anyway, out of curiosity didn't you actually buy this account sometime ago?
I remember it was originally owned by: Trico
Here is the interview with him:
https://www.erepublik.com/mk/article/-moha-interview-with-echilean-cp-trico-2401875/1/20
I know who is Trico and where does he come from originally.
Eddy waves o/
Buying Trico's account? Old news...
Monster Grinder, didn't you also buy your account?
"WE ARE THE BREATH OF FRESH AIR!"
Shouting will not remove the distinct odour of BS
Beauty doesn't lie in the eye of the beholder, but it comes from inside of the one who carries it.
What is a bad smell to you, it's a nice smell to someone else.
How true, bad smells frequently come from what people carry inside. Might I suggest a better diet
I was talking about the beauty coming from inside and about different perception of the smell.
But, I can't help you, you are a lost soul.
Take a bath or a shower, I think you need it.
Sexa is just old, he can't help smelling of piss.
Anyone who has ever opened up a body will know beauty is not something found inside unless you have a really really weird fetishism and probably should be on some sort of watch list. Beauty is only found on the outside and even then in the eyes of the beholder.
Another new party, this gettin' confusing.
vote 9
"So next time, if someone tells you to move from your own to another party and vote on the orders of your superiors"
BP might have "superiors" I doubt if any other party has anything like that in place. As for following orders, you have a better chance of herding cats than anyone outside of BP obeying anything.
Have you thought that maybe the "better" candidate won?
"Have you thought that maybe the "better" candidate won?"
I have the impression, a multi has won.
Obviously your impression has no effect on the admins
Your party invited tons of foreign players to bolster it's numbers. Those numbers just didn't vote for you and now you and some others are claiming a PTO.
It's almost like an entire plan backfired and now you're a tad aggravated that you have to start from scratch.
It is Keith who constantly goes on about it being a multi and he basically accuses any account that doesn't agree with him of being one.