USAF damage isn't enough?
greeling
Hello America,
There has been a lot of talk recently about how USAF is no longer a good option and doesn’t do enough damage especially compared to War Inc. and Easy Company. The damage USAF is a fraction to what these PMUs do, why should our taxes be spent on USAF if they can’t even compete with them, USAF must be very inefficient and not doing its job right. I can say plenty of reasons why I think USAF is necessary and is needed, but that's not why I am here.
I am here to explain that USAF is doing the most damage it can with the funds they get and with the soldiers they have. I recently went through all the soldiers in USAF and calculated the strength of the whole MU of all active soldiers(fought in the last couple days) to see what it would be. Its a whopping 7,727,993.98 with everyone combined. With there being 125 active soldiers that makes for the average soldier's strength to be 61823.95. With that you can calculate the influence of each hit to be 64402. Just numbers so far that don’t mean much.
So lets look at the supplies that USAF get. It is 80,000 a week, which is set by congress. With 80,000cc you can buy 11764 tanks. That many tanks gets you 117,640 hits, thats a lot of clicking. So now that we know how many hits we can do and how much influence we do lets figure out how much damage USAF can put out. Well that number is 7.3 billion, that’s how much damage USAF with their supplies. Now lets look to see how much damage USAF did last week, 15.5 billion damage more than doubling what it should be able to do. This is also without calculating what it would cost to for food to make up for health in fights and programs that help fund new players to get better training grounds.
The damage for last week
So why do these PMUs do so much more damage than USAF without them receiving supplies, the answer is simple the PMUs have more players that are tanks in their MUs. USAF last week only has 2 players that did over a billion damage. War Inc had 22 players, and Easy Company had 13 players.
This is where USAF needs more support
So defunding USAF is not the solution. USAF needs to find a way to encourage members to join and hold them to the MU. Possibly increasing the funding the USAF gets therefore being able to give out more tanks and encourage the bigger hitting players to join USAF. I think increasing funding isn't the right way but USAF must find ways to encourage big hitting players to join and one thing they want is tanks.
As always lets end with some Gosling
Dictator for life of Greelingada
Greeling
NEEDS MORE GREELING!!!
Comments
NEEDS MORE GREELING!!!
TL😉R Gosling.
"With 80,000cc you can buy 11764 tanks. That many tanks gets you 235,280 hits"
wat
You do know that a Q7 tank is good for 10 hits, yeah?
Which means that our damage is WAY more than what we could do, since there are 1/2 as many hits. o>
USAF, over-efficient as usual.
how did I mess that up, thanks for correcting that
80k cc combined with a proper commune buys you far more than 11k tanks..
Much like hits are based on strength and rank.. not just strength.
Sloppy or intentionally misleading?
I based it off a God of War*** rank somewhere on a higher level. Now I could have done what can 80000 dollars with a proper commune but there are other factors I could put in. Cost of tax work tax, paying workers, cost of food to supply, cost of gold for programs to help build up training grounds.
And you probably should have if you were trying to paint an honest picture.
Sadly, IMO the bulk of USAF's budget goes to COs that are quickly sucked up by the super tanks of the world, instead of buying the Q7 weapons....
I can confirm this is not accurate. COs are not used regularly.
Then why is that being used as an argument to retain the 8% tax rate? Even if that is correct then the USAF is arming their 125 active soldiers with 940 Q7 weapons weekly, far more than needed....
This is a pretty good angle of analysis. Although some will question why the USAF has no supertanks...
We lost a lot of our "super tanks" when the merger happened. There's was a lot of community lost at that time. We're trying to rebuild that, and would gladly welcome back any of the former "super tanks" who want to revive that sense of community.
I want me some USAF!
OMG my Husband!
O.O Where?
/me looks in multiple directions.
lol good luck with that.
Come get some, USAF! o>
★★★PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE★★★
★★★PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE★★★
FIST
#vote
Weakfags, even 1,5 years ago the MU was twice as strong.
#doublerekt
i blame ze germenz
#tyrannosaurusrekt
Slow couple weeks for me. 🙁 I have not able to hit any Epic battles lately so I have not restored my EB stash from weekly rewards. If you time it right, you can hit 15,000 PP a week and only have a net lose of like 100-150 EBs
That's basically what I've been doing, did 2.7b and ended with more tanks then I started with.
ROFL. Yeah, usually you and I are fighting it out for #1
You've been not doing a good job lately trekker. I've been doing double what the #2 been doing for the last 3 weeks and this week isn't looking any different. 😛
To do all that for us mere mortals :
- buy the blitzkriegpack unless you're here 24/7 to catch the few epics there are
- buy gold
That is the recipe for a instant win Director 9
★★★PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE★★★
Vote #19
★★★PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE★★★
voted
This is indeed the whole issue.
Very good article
\o/
why is greeling writing a serious article?
The end is near?
I recently had a head injury
★★★PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE★★★
★★★PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE★★★
Still does not prove there should be a MU that is funded by the government. It does prove that a independent MU such as War Inc or Easy Company can with the right set up draw more players and do a better job of dealing out damage then a governmental MU. This basically just says we want to keep taxing everyone and we will decide how much we will take from you, oh and we have a MU that we will use the cc on.
Only a tiny proportion of the tax money goes to the MU. And whose account did you buy and rename?
So then we do not need a government MU. Account has always been mine.
Subsidizing a national MU makes sense if it is targeted at low level players and includes a system to get their training grounds max'd out.
This would benefit the nation with stronger player retention and greatly improved lower division damage.
Supporting high level players does not make as much sense. They can buy their own damn gold like the rest of us idiots if they want to be heavy hitters in Div 4.
Then you do not know that Easy Company actually has more Div 1 - Div 3 players that are helped completely through the process and they are even active. EZC is a MU with the new players in mind and young players ... EZC tries to help every player that is willing to learn and grow Div 1 - Div 4. You do not have to buy gold to be in Easy Company to be in Div 4 either.
Easy Company is building the country and working on having a stronger retention among its players.
vote 37
😮
V