UN - A possible way to gather countries?

Day 2,630, 13:02 Published in Norway Norway by Jan Steinhard

As warfare for blood and land seems to be the hipster movement of things to do in this game, there seems to be a lack of democracy. It is only present within a country`s politics system and choices, but outside that, it feels like a war run by dictators and some of the grumpiest people in the world. As this is escalating, we are in dire need of an society which can ensure that each country has a land that is declared as a secure habitat. How can we do that? UN is the way we can do that!

You have probly heard about the UN right? If not, then do a backrgound check so you can understand what im gonna talk about.

Back to the case. There is an obvious challenge in order to even make an alliance with all the countries but an even bigger problem is that countries want some benefits through this. These benefits are excactly what makes this the hardest thing to do

If we are to make every country a part of this, there are bound to be problems and these are directly linked to country advantages. Here is another on of mine fine examples:

Lets take a look at Canada (currently occupied). If they were to join, they would probly want the land back, but that would mean that we had to talk to the people currently has the control over it. Now, they would probably make a deal to keep some of the land, but if there are more countries involved, then the problems escalate and we have to resort to other forms such as payment, which can make the UN, easily be a money drainage hole.

On the bright side, with every country in one place, we can actually ensure that every country has a say in their politics and opinions on the world which can be used to better the situation for per say, Oman.

We would need a hierarchy in the UN, consisting of powerful countries but we could not make it that powerful so this is how it would work:

- The top 10 countries get a seat in the hieracrhy (the Main Commision) where they have veto rights and more options

- One extra country will be given a seat due to assisting in the humanitarian angle (the board for Human Rights Assosiation would chose the country).

- Two more countries would have to apply and give their reason to why they want to be there (usually open to everybody, unless the country has been looked down upon by the other UN countries)

- Finally, the founding fathers of the UN will always be present (Norway,Sweden,Japan and etc.)

By using a system like this, we can ensure that every country can get their say in this. There would be more countries avaible if they do more good things. There would also be a change in the neutral countries so that the most countries could have their say. In addition, we would introduce Boards where countries enter a spesific board for spesific work. For example:

Norway would be in the Economy Fund Board, where they look at todays economy and help the countries get the right economy, so that it would be balanced. There would be a board for War and maybe another board for Foreign Affairs and etc.

If i went to power/my party went to power, i would aim to make this happen and invest all the countries funds into making this happen.

But what do you think about this? Do you think this would be the best option for the future or dou you think there are too many challenges to face? Leave your opinion and other comments down below.

And as always: Subscribe to The Norwegian Heat for more topics and issues around the world, and Norway!