The Binda Issue
Schoft
As per her article:
"My role in Seal Team 6
ST6 is an independent MU that fights for all Countries, regardless of alliance, and has never once fought against eAustralia in the two years I have been a member there. They are dear friends to me and have treated me well over the years.
However. I see that my being part of ST6 looks iffy to some citizens here, so after a very long and agonising think, I have decided to remove myself from the ST6 MU, should I be elected as CP."
This is an issue which should be addressed right now, since Binda is our own ADF Marshall. The problem with this what I see and looking on http://www.egov4you.info/Pulse/ there has been some fighting for Australia and do not attack her on that, but it is the fact she is fighting for the USA and other CoT countries. I might have been mistaken but thats not our alliance we are flirting with.
As an ADF Marshall you have n00bs looking up t you as they follow their leader, so its not about I quit once I am elected as CP.
This is about making a choice beforehand, will I be ADF or ST6.
Disclaimer: I do not have any issue with ST6, like eg EZ company etc. But we are on opposite spectrums so this will not work. I am ready for ST6 like they have done in the past to troll/flame on my articles
Comments
I love Binda ~_^
Solution=Flatster4CP
** But we are on opposite spectrums so this will not work.**
,,, Just how does one get all those Mercenary awards?
pot meet kettle
You would think someone of your caliber would know it is entirely possible to get a Merc Medal without fighting for your enemies.
Molly Jo your missing the point deary.
The point of the article was about her roll as ADF Marshall and her being a member of ST6. Leading one to place in suspect her loyalties.
It is my understanding she has been a member of ST6 for two years and Marshall for 14 months. So now her loyalty is being questioned? Please.
Now you wrongly read into my response to the Merc medal. Staying on point... it's about following orders. There is no way you can follow orders set by the AU Govt and have 11 medals. Hence the bot calling the kettle black.
Forgive Rock, he apparently thinks having Pro CoT MU Commander as CP of a Pro TWO nation is a good idea.
Nah easy in eAustralia since we are now in our 3rd alliance.
If it was a merc hunter we are talking about I would not have a problem, but it is mainly fighting for USA and even Chile.
While you are mentioning the words pot and kettle, who was the MoD again in Binda's great Chile give away. That must have been a great job that MoD did last year, just saying
So then I took the coconut cookie out of the bag of chocolate chip cookies and eated it. That solved that. Now everyone gets chocolate chip cookie cause there is no coconut cookie to fight over 😃 I solved something today 🙂
Nobody likes the coconut cookies, who are you kidding?
You're just saying that cause I eated the cookie 😃
Voted, that cat scares me
Maybe I am too late for this question.
I wasn't around so I am leaning from the map.
Aug 3 2012 we were occupied by Indo and were wiped.
Aug 4 Brazil attacked Indo and we must have won 2 RW.
Aug 5 Binda was elected.
Aug 6 - 9 - Brazil and Indo were fighting. We were winning RW.
Aug 11 - 12 USA attacking Indo
Aug 16 Australia whole.
Aug 17 - Sept 3 - USA is attacking Indo
Sept 1 - NZ took Taz
Sept 2 - We took Canterbury.
Late Aug early Sept - Chile is beating Argentina.
Sept 5 - Chile takes Canterbury and moves in. They had a full country and occupied a little Argentina when they made the NE.
When did Indo and Chile join CoT? When did USA?
Did anyone think that Chile would give up the fight that the map says they were doing OK to move to OZ?
How could of the USA helped more?
Thanks
USA made moved to join CoT in Dec. So a totally different time period.
A precondition of a USA CoT application was that Aus sign a NAP with Chile to end the resistance. The USA got a 3 month trial membership (renewed twice) and the NAP was over by Feb after repeated Indo invasions of Aus in Jan.
USA looked the other way (CP Fingerguns said Aus was a soap opera) and walked way to not jeopardise CoT membership. Brazil backed out of CoT membership partly over the debacle. CoT spent 2 months finding both Chile and Aus guilty of breaching the NAP and have yet to reach a verdict on Indo breaking the CoT Charter.
PDB Quote: (some POTUS diary or something from the time)
So all of our suspicions about this Australia-Chile-Indo thing have essentially been confirmed.
Apparently Binda is attempting to manipulate Chile into releasing Queensland by provoking Indonesia and offering up Western Australia. They figure it's a win-win. Either Chile gives them the region, or Chile breaks the deal and Australia looks like victims. I've been asked multiple times if we are going to 'hold up our end' w/r/t Chile. Meaning will we go to war with Chile if they break this deal.
Now I can't help but wonder if ST6 is more involved than we realized, as I got a message from Maxx Johnson this morning about this shit ("is this the sort of thing we can expect from CoT????")
-fingerguns