Bias

Day 719, 04:32 • Published in USA United Kingdom • by AltmerVampire


The word bias is thrown about a lot these days. Since I’m publishing this in EDEN/Brolliance countries many of you will believe I am referring to how PEACE countries are treated (according to Avec’s article) incredibly favourably.

But lets look at it from the other side of the argument, shall we? And that is the purpose of this article, so I’m assuming this is where many of you will drop off. PEACE propaganda and all that… So anyway, lets continue with this article!

Now, admittedly I agree with most of Avec’s article, until he reaches the section entitled “712th Day of the New Worl😛 Hungary attacks Croatia, Russia attacks USA and Finland”

In this section of the article Avec tells us how it was in fact, not a coincidence that the admins announced that alliances now need to be constantly renewed to be useful in war situations or they would just disappear. He points out how the admins just seemed to decide on this change as soon as Hungary and Russia has just activated a tonne of MPPs. So clearly the admins are biased and madly in love with PEACE, yeah?



Now, lets look at it from another perspective. Lets look at the USA’s military stats page… Ok, from the looks of it this slight change in the MPP rules would massively benefit the US, saying as it due to their enemies activated MPPs that they were invaded and nearly crushed in the first place. But yet, we seem to be ignoring the fact this would hugely benefit the US and several other EDEN countries, solely because it would also benefit PEACE countries.

The admins announced new MPP costs a little while ago, how is it weird that they announce further updates in the same vein a few days after they do this?

Both alliances are hugely paranoid the other alliance is being treated much more favourably than themselves. I remember the outrage in PEACE nations about the new MPP costs and how they believed the admins were taking the side of EDEN/Brolliance in the matter; they believed that since EDEN/Brolliance would profit from it (supposedly more than PEACE) then the admins were blatantly biased.

Were the admins biased in this case? Maybe, maybe not. I can’t honestly say but the fact people jumped to conclusions shows this ridiculous paranoia and fear found in both sides.

Neither alliance is good. Neither alliance is evil. Both sides believed they were trying to save Belgium, sending ATO teams that the other viewed as a PTO team. And to be honest they probably both were (to an outside perspective) a PTO team.

Both alliances try to do the best for the nations and to destroy the other alliance. Does this make either side evil? Does this make either side heroes?

No.

This is a game. Play it without hatred and with an open mind.



Toodles,
AV