Another Congress Article
Lord Lewis Cromwell
Hi everyone
It's that time of the month again, when everyone's getting excited and garnering the support they can for our nation's congress elections!
This article is not going to be filled with "Vote for me, I'm epic" nor "I promise an end to world hunger if I hold a seat on congress", but rather this article is a reminder of the responsibilities that congress hold.
Citizenship acceptances
Recently a working system for our nation's immigration concerns was overturned after heavy personal, a little misguided and poorly implemented campaigning from parties calling themselves the opposition. With the stepping down of the only willing and able servant from the position, congress voted in a new, old way of vetting players from foreign nation's teams who wish to join our's.
In November 2012 a huge majority of congress accepted that a method to check and agree on accepting citizenship requests from existing players who have played on teams rival to our national team is needed, that individual congressmen are not qualified to use their own, solitary judgment to accept citizenship requests from potentially malicious players, and that congressmen who do not adhere to agreed procedures should be punished in some form. These are points raised by every side of the debate, not 2 years ago, not in beta, but in November 2012.
The new system, voted in by a huge majority, uses congressmen to check applications from players who play for other teams before wanting to join ours, before congressmen tell congressmen that that player has no malicious intentions. I have not seen a single mention in any of this month's potential congress members individual manifestos:
"I am Lord Lewis Cromwell, and I am knowledgeable in the field of vetting citizenships for players who previously played on other nations' teams, and will work only for eUK's good regardless of personal opinion on personalities."
With this said, I do not agree that an immigration committee is the best our nation can do. It is an inefficient system, with contradictory arguments used to support it. It is not a good option for the security of our national team. Only 3 dared vote against this popularly debated issue and proposal:
Lord Lewis Cromwell
Kravenn
Neil Lewis
Anyone else on congress who disagreed did not care enough to cast a vote, either in-game through mail, forum PM, nor on the vote itself. Maybe they cared but had a chip on their shoulder stopping them from functioning as a congressman, which suggests they don't deserve a vote.
If we want a successful system to determine whether a potential addition to eUK's citizenship base from existing, external players is a threat in some form, it will be through (and I will continue to petition for) a Minister and Ministry of Immigration, made up of knowledgeable, reliable and intelligent people, regardless of party or congress positions, who can work together to give a public sanction on citizenship applications which will make it easier for congressmen to check, agree/disagree and accept applications.
By this method of sanctioning, we know that checks are being done for the national good, people willing and able to make effective judgments are being utilised to full effect and congressmen/PP's are left with choices to make, satisfying the responsibilities of their positions. With any unsanctioned acceptances being judged by PP's who can bump that congressman down or off the next month's list due to pressure or disagreement with policy being the only true, realistic argument used in any debating so far, this method will work.
Natural Enemies
This past couple of months has seen quite a few unnecessary, unplanned and unwarranted votes for our congress to aimlessly click on. A few times we have had to vote down Ireland as our Natural Enemy (NE) and most recently had to vote down Russia as our NE.
Why is this? "Automatic Retaliation" initiated by people too lazy to do 10 minutes of research yet are still, unaccountably members of our national congress. Each time these NE proposals were launched it was exactly because some little troll in one of our neighbouring countries, without public desire or sanction in mind, proposed us as NE through their own personal wishes.
By automatically counter-proposing NE against this one troll in our neighbouring country, we make that fool the most powerful person in our nation, who has decided that we should be eligible for war at his whim.
"I am Lord Lewis Cromwell, and I will think before I propose. I will not try to kick up a fuss, nor be controlled by situations, instead I will control the situation and make necessary judgments for eUK's good."
With the most recent "automatic counter-proposal", Russia appeared to genuinely be declaring war on us - as part of my voluntary service in our ministry of Foreign Affairs I was able to help inform our congress on the situation and we got out of what could have been a very embarassing situation (as well as losing a good MPP) down to an "automatic counter-proposal" which due to an incompetent foreign minister and a moment's confusion could've led to a war we'd be unlikely to win.
ESO!
There's been a lot of buzz about "opposition" parties lately, obviously their heavy campaigning and vitriolic aggression is temporarily paying off, but ESO is still and will always be here with me in it.
We don't campaign purely because other people are stomping their feet, that would imply that they are controlling us.
We don't throw our ideals into everyone's faces because we respect people.
We won't offer free things to people if they join us, because we give freely all the time.
I am just one, we have many more like me.
Everything else
I hope that I have continued to show my worth to our national team this month. November is a terribly personal and difficult month for me, with marked occasions and the like that I'd rather forget about which has only mildly affected my presence in eRepublik. December will be glorious!
I'm proud to represent ESO, the only party that will let me truly have these opinions, which my brothers, sisters and friends in the party might not always agree with but sure as hell do respect. I write this more to display how deserving they are of your support than I am.
Be cool, stay cool
LLC
PS: ESO's unified manifesto is here!
Comments
good luck o7
Hope to see you in there...
"the only party that will let me truly have these opinions, which my brothers, sisters and friends in the party might not always agree with but sure as hell do respect." THIS SENTENCE IS FALSE! The only party that respects your opinion thru and thru is NEW ERA. You can be a New Era and express freely against Goku, Alphabethis, Dr. Hugh and whatever you like. LLC you are a pro-TUP and YOU KNOW IT. I was attacked by you many times when I was in ESO and expressed myself against TUP.
"attacked" you'll have to explain and remind me of that, as far as I remember all you did was baffle me then leave.
I am sometimes pro-TUP, when there is an issue that I think, freely and without influence from barkers like you, that they have done nothing wrong I will say "They have done nothing wrong". You are right, I am a sometimes pro-TUP member of ESO. I am a member of ESO and allowed to voice whatever opinion I like. I do not see your point at all (if you have one).
New Era are putting forward party policies that they claim are receiving party-wide acceptance, with members saying that they do not agree with those policies. You might feel like people are allowed to criticise your PP internally but then you are entirely missing my point.
The ability to criticise someone is not a symbol of a group which accepts one another. Acceptance removes the criticisms and instills a sense of respect for one another whereby you can disagree without criticising.
Ok, criticism doesn't imply an attack or anything nasty. I know that in REAL LIFE UK the word "criticize" and to criticize is "officially" avoided by everyone. This is a very british issue. I can be very critic and yet respectful. We are not sheep that accept by principle.
accept anything, I mean.
Again, I think you have completely misunderstood me.
I also don't recall saying that you were sheep or yes-men, perhaps you are being a little too defensive for your own good. I think you'll find that I said "ESO, the only party that will let me truly have these opinions..." as I do not believe that had I been a member of another party I could be as free as I am now (it is impossible to be more free) to express myself as an individual without being hounded either into or out of the spotlight.
I'm free to express my opinions LLC, my party does not discourage me in anyway. In fact most would promote it (helps my opinions are normally right though). Then again UKPP expresses freedom of choice for the player. After all it's our game and we all enjoy it differently.
Best of luck M8
Gr8 Candidate From ESO
Good Luck to all proposed candidates