[WAL] Temporary Situation
Walhallah
Fellow Citizens,
Congress gave an order to the CP to remove all of her Government from office through this motion: http://enetherlands.nl/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=12881
This motion followed a debate about punishing the current government De La Rey I(of National Unity) that followed the PTO government of Lord Jale I, for lack of communication. It may come as no surprise to you that I voted 'NO' against such a reasoning.
Our lawbook states "12.4. If the motion of no confidence is accepted, the person(s) in question will BE discharged from office immediately."
Effectively, this means that the current government has not BEEN discharged, simply because of the fact that this in fact WAS not executed. Our previous CP didnt have the time to do it, before she was impeached herself.
Effectively, we are still here without CP, and Congress has NO clue how to solve this mess.
Being current in-game vCP (until discharged) and Congressman, I presented the option that I remain representing our Country until somebody gets elected (in about a week) that can execute the wishes of Congress and remove me and my fellow members of government.
Follow this interesting debate HERE
regards
Walhallah
Vice-CP-to-be-discharged
Comments
As already explained on the forum you're not at interim president.
effectively I am, against the wishes of the Congress thats true. Now let the people see the debate first and we can vote for my option or any other. Any option is good in my book (none other was presented yet)
I trust that more people than the 5 that voted yes on your Impeachment proposal will get to decide on this tho..
We have no government at the moment. Period.
See this vote of a Motion of no confidence versus the whole government, effectively sacking everyone in it:
http://enetherlands.nl/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=12881&start=10
So you are also no longer vice-CP. Actually you lost that function even before the in-game impeachment...
And no, if the whole gov gets dismissed by congress, the CP does not have to remove everyone in person, in case that's what you're thinking. Congress has done the job for the CP.
"effectively" you are not set as in-game CP so no you are not.
I think it is very weird that as State Secretary of Coaching I get discharged for something I didn't had any influence in...
This is clearly a wrong use of the article 12.
There cannot be a government without CP.
So though this is not your fault, we have no ministers and state secretaries at the moment, so indeed you also lost your position.
CP impeachment does mean the entire cabinet goes away unless the next CP agrees to keep a part of it on.
Ok I understand.
To be honest. I think anybody that was in Gens goverment. Schould not have any influence of power anymore. She got impeacht and so did her goverment. I do say if this article 12 is real. You have your right to remain seated as prime minister. And if i may ask where do i find this Lawbook? I do not see it anywhere in-game. As for why the trouble to keep yourself prime minister?
http://enetherlands.nl/viewforum.php?f=174
Thank you !
first of all, I cannot dismiss myself, theres no button for it. I need an elected CP to do that. Second of all, we need to work in a stable situation towards the new elections. The law leaves this interpretation open, because it states I 'will be dismissed', not that I 'am dismissed'
will BE discharged from office immediately.
immediately
ɪˈmiːdɪətli/
adverb
adverb: immediately
1.
at once; instantly.
good luck finding somebody that can be dismissing this government...
All i ask is for understanding why im still sitting in my office.
Your party created this mess, so if my option doesnt fancy you, present a better one. And present one that accumulates more than 5 votes.
Why did the CP get Impeachted? And then think why you didnt get "dismissed". Congress impeachted your CP and her goverment with it.
As for as those laws go. thats a nice set of rules. But none of them are in-game and seem useless to me because its external.
The lawbook is used to prevent chaos ingame. If we hadn't those, we would always have a dictator.
There were 9 votes, so almost half of congress voted for the MoNC or only voted for passing the quorum. But you don't trust the voting and want a revoting?
We dont have chaos, this whole thing started because there was lack of information. To solve this we had a MoNC against the gov, but no alternative. Very clever.
And at this time of lack of information? Where you part of the impeachted goverment as prime minister?
you, me and the rest of gov were discharged the second the vote for the motion ended. what is so difficult to understand about that?
yes you have your fancy in-game title but that means nothing. and the cp not having time is also bullshit. she did remove my in-game title....
The law says 'will be discharged'. But its not uncommon that interpretations vary between the party that started this vote and other citizens. I find it funny tho that we place so much value on a vote that had 5 'yes-votes' (only, and of which the majority was from I&W) and none on in-game political titles. How convenient for the party that started this vote, i'd say
all CM's were aware of the debate and vote. if they refuse to vote that is their problem.
sigh in-game titles have nothing to do with it. they are just flavor, that the admins implemented to try and keep the masses entertained instead of working on solutions to the game.
here comes the truly important wor😛 solution. What is your solution? Because I presented Congress and the population a solution, and since this is against your interretation of forum-laws you area against it. Or you are against it because im in DLR Gov, or because its me and you use these rules to be against. Thats also fine. My question is, what is your option and feel free to present it to the public.
There are a lot of solutions proposed in congress. But I don't think we should take a solution which results in disagreements.
as you can read on the forum several players have already been proposed.
Im fine with any option. I just think that seeing how inmportant communication is, we should have this debate in the open.
it is out in the open. on our forum every eNL citizen has access to the open debate section.
i'll vote for wlhallah as interim ...... easiest way out of this mess...... and all over that a part of dutch society has the opinion that there's a lack of communication.... pretty sad though...
It's not just the lack of communication. But fighting a secret war, ignoring decisions of congress and not taking responsibility of actions are the reasons to impeach a government. Especially a government which doesn't have full legitimacy of the people.
still it created a bigger mess , should've just be patient for a week,... by than the elections are up again ....
Just cut our losses & role with the punches, now we look like being a banana republic,..... which is not strange..... with 2 impeachments in less than a month....
I'm okay with what the majority votes...though, I'd like to see a "Vice President" elected if possible. it would eliminate this type of problem. which seems to be happening ever more frequently...
Sorry Wal, ik mag je graag maar dit slaat nergens op.
Had het gewoon aan het congres voorgelegd i.p.v. gewoon te stellen dat je nog steeds v-cp bent. Het lijkt nu net alsof je de "macht" naar je toe wilt harken en geeft De La Rey en het congres daar de schuld van.
Het is gewoon een feit dat de regering is afgezet door het congres, en daarna de president zelf. Punt klaar uit, geen spelt tussen te krijgen. 2 votes. 1 opt forum 1 ingame. Daar kan je gewoon niks tegenin brengen.
het IS aan het congres voorgelegd, via het debat op de link. En nu ook aan het echte volk, wat niet in zn volledigheid op het forum komt, zoals iedereen weet.
En om macht is het mij niet te doen. Ik ben niet voor niets recent teruggetreden als Commander.
Ik wil echter wel het ridicule van deze gebeurtenissen aankaarten.
Door het nog ridiculer te maken? 😛
How did you guys get yourselves into this mess now?
The last impeachment got us out of the mess.
an (in my eyes) unnecessary impeachment it the cause of this mess. GDLR shouldn't have been impeached in the first place.
Why was she impeached? I must say, Dutch politics is so refreshing sometimes. I do miss it.
[removed]
well... in short :
- congress voted against the TW with eBE. but eBE had already proposed us as NE so we kinda went with it and still fought the TW. some people are quite angry with GDLR for not communicating properly with eBE and preventing the NE proposal in eBE. (which i find quite a ridiculous reason for impeachment)
- GDLR apparently didn't communicate much with the rest of the government (which is not a valid reason for impeachment)...
- and lastly "Another problem I have which is more minor is the lack of responsibility taken by the people in charge Gen. de La Rey said it wasn't her war while she is CP and she is responsible." this is simply because it was not her decision to start a TW. if i remember correctly (might be misinformed) this TW was planned by NSSP because of the eBelgium PTO threat.
Kinda failed to mention a couple things, not surprising.
The vote about the TW with Belgium was voted down before the actual in-game NE from Belgium. By the words from our MoD at the time, he said yes to NSPP/Belgium to start the war even though Congress said no. The CP gave free rein for the MoD to do so.
Second point is simply, zero communication, people has to ask why Belgium started the NE. Even during the war there was no information. So a MoNC was started and also served as the base for the Impeachment.
Tim stop making up things, there was no approval given for the war.
GEN. DE LA REY to Kanselier | 12 days ago
I have still not given approval for the TW. Unfortunately our congress have voted it down. The attack on us was early. Who gave you the go ahead?
And war is a bonus in my books as well, however, now everybody is on my back for starting a war without congress approval although I did not.
Kanselier to GEN. DE LA REY | 12 days ago
We had that impression after Vladimir relaunched the debate
Our former MoD clearly said, "I did agreed on NSPP plan while congress decline TW with Belgium". Then continued saying, "[The CP] giving me free hand in this idea".
Nice, and we are hearing that just now? After 12 f***n days? 🙂
I quote my statement of 11 days ago: "As it happened Belgium rejected the UK plan as they wanted a war with us. And then of course the PTO-ers started the vote before our congress vote had finished or we had given go ahead for the war. "
And that covers the above in what way?
The PTO-ers started the vote before our congress vote had finished or we had given go ahead for the war.
Yes he did agree with the plan which was very successful mainly as we were able to keep it from the PTO' ers and the Valeyard, however nobody from our side gave the go ahead to continue or start the war. I sent a message to all the leaders including the UK, Germany and Belgium that we would not go ahead without congress approval.
He agreed to it after Congress voted no, and there wasn't much time between the forum vote and the NE. Have you asked their CP or MoD?
How much evidence do you want?
e Vladimir
e Vladimir to Jude Conners and 11 more people | 14 days ago
The fool Kanselier already started the NE law. :/
http://www.erepublik.com/en/main/law/Belgium/152815
http://prntscr.com/5hocxy