[MC]Congress elections: a petition to players and plato
Michael Crookes
Hello eWorld!
It’s been a very long time since I last wrote an article, and in that time I have moved across the world from the eUK to my new (not so new anymore) home in eChile. I will begin by introducing myself to those of you who might not know me. My name is Michael and I have been playing erepublik for more than 4 years now. I joined to have something to do, and I stay because I love the people I have met here.
Over my time in the game, there have been many changes, in fact the game we play today is almost unrecognisable from the game it once was (particularly in V2). We have seen changes to the way we fight, work, communicate and ultimately achieve satisfaction from this game. However, there is one change that I has negatively affected my experiences in this game more than any other. It is a change which has largely been ignored by the community since it happened more than a year ago, but which I hope to put back into the spotlight (in my own little way) through today’s article. That change was the congress election procedure change.
The old system
The major difference between the old election system and the current one is that the old system was based on regions. In order to run for congress, a player would candidate in exactly the same way as they do today, but instead of being put on a whole party list, they would be put on their region’s congress list. For example, if I wanted to run for congress, and my account was in Norte Grande then I would be a candidate for Norte Grande (still running in my party). Each party was allowed 3 candidates in each region and those candidates would be decided by the party president on the 24th of each month.
This all sounds pretty insignificant, but here is the key: rather than voting for a party, each citizen could vote for an individual from their region. What this meant was that if a new player ran a particularly good campaign, then they stood a chance of getting elected even if they were up against a well-known player and a good congressman would gain support from individuals who could then vote him again in subsequent elections. In other words, it gave people an incentive to be active, and to work hard to be good congressmen.
Did it really encourage activity?
In short: YES. If I am honest, the reason that I first got involved in the eUK community is because of these elections. I was put forward as a candidate in London in my first elections, and I vividly remember the excitement of the elections, I remember campaigning beforehand, I remember messaging on the day, and I remember the elation when my hard work paid off and I became a member of congress in November of 2010.
However, this activity incentive was not just for new citizens. I was quickly placed in the role of congress election director for my party (UKRP
❤) and I, together with other more experienced players spent hours working on our election strategy; where was it best to place each candidate, how should we present our candidates as a party and how could we encourage them to promote themselves as a candidate too.
This all cumulated in an intense 24 hours where the election strategists from each part pitted themselves against one another, directing votes and trying to keep as many of their candidates ahead of the competition as possible. These were my fondest memories of this game and I made many friends on those nights (you know who you are).
September 2012
President Obama after being given the news that the voting system was changing
In the September congress elections, all this changed, and we were instead given the system of election which we have been using to this day. A system where individuals mean nothing and where whoever controls a party, controls the election. The current system creates no incentive to be active. Who honestly can say that they watch the congress elections with excitement? The truth is, if the party president happens not to look favourably upon you, you won’t be elected.
When I joined this game it was so much more than the game that I play today. Erepublik has become a game all about money…whoever is willing to spend the most will do the best. A lot of this blame lies with the admins, but the players should take their share of the blame; the voters club for example (and before them orgs), has turned the media module into a pay-to-win module.
My request to the admins is simple:
Please give us a module which motivates players, a module which rewards activity and which brings back some of the excitement into this game:
Please give us back the old congress election system
And finally, my request to you, the citizens of erepublik: If you agree with me, and would like to see this change, please don’t simply vote my article or comment, please tell the admins. however, please tell them in a respectful manner, and with courtesy.
Stay safe and play hard!
(Michael Crookes)
Comments
Pole - Agree
I agree. Current system sucks.
Voted \o/
http://www.erepublik.com/br/article/cot-is-dead--2326956/1/20
Agree
Admins: No just more tournaments, lets change the game
Voted!
Agree.
Agreed. I wasn't around with the old system but love the idea of having constituencies! 🙂
Voted! \o/
tic tac vote that
might be a better idea if the admins opened up congress elections to include the top 10, not just the top 5, parties: between 12 - 14 votes wins a seat usually
returning to the old system would allow parties outside the top 5 to run candidates in top 5 parties without the top 5 parties missing out. In other words, UKPP could run ESO candidates and then just tell their members "vote for UKPP candidates" while ESO does likewise
I miss the old style, but I don't miss vote directing on IRC for 18 hours straight...
I don't miss the 18 straight hours of life wasted, but you have to admit, it was a whole lot more entertaining than what we have today
I agree, this system sucks!
Agreed, the old system was much more fair!
Yo pienso que el sistema actual es mejor que el antiguo y que se amolda mejor con los que son países que buscan atraer gente nueva al juego y volverla activa.
El sistema actual es más limpio, dificulta los toveos al país y a los partidos y desinsentiva que los jugadores creen multis para conseguir por si mismos una silla en el congreso, pues ahora se vota por el partido. Por otro lado le da un sentido a la existencia de los partidos políticos, pues ahora los partidos grandes, que son los que eligen congresitas, por ser los q mas militantes tienen y estan en el top 5, deciden en asamblea la lista de candidatos al congreso, por lo que los candidatos representan al partido y los principios e ideas que este encarna, asi los congresitas actualmente representan un grupo que tienen una visión no como antes que representaban muchos solo su visión o sus ambiciones individuales, pues se votaba por la persona y no por algo más grande como lo que representa todo un partido y sus ideas y eso hacia que muchos se eligieran por sus multis o por su popularidad y que muchas veces no tuvieran ningún lazo con el partido al que supuestamente representaban. Por último el sistema nuevo facilita la renovación y que los nuevos jugadores puedan acceder al congreso, pues de iotra manera alguien relativamente nuevo nunca sería tan popular para llegar por si mismo al congreso de manera limpia, lo que hacia que siempre los mismos salieran, sino miren que los congresistas de antes acumulaban 10 o más medallas algunos, hoy un nuevo puede involucrarse y ayudar en su partido y ese esfuerzo y aporte ser premiado llevándolo su partido en la lista con la prioridad ganada. El sistema antiguo era bueno para países poco poblados en que los mismos de siempre se mantenían activos y acaparaban los cargos, pero no con el juego actual en que se busca atraer nuevos jugadores e involucrarlos en los temas país.
I'm afraid I only speak english :/
Ustedes me podran decir que el sistema actual le da mucho poder al PP y sus amigos, pero en los partidos más grandes, eso en los hechos no se puede dar de manera tan abusiva pues un partido en el que su PP hace lo que se le da la gana sin considerar la opinion de los militantes activos es un partido que simplemente no se puede mantener o no puede pretender llegar al top 5, los partidos que caen en so rapidamente empiezan a perder a sus miembros más importantes y eso ya lo estamos viendo en Chile en algunos casos.