Rules for strategy

Day 3,792, 12:15 • Published in USA USA • by Alphabethis

After my last article, I would seem I am interested in posinous criticism. But
don't take me wrong. I genuinelly want to see a strategy at work. Since....

1. A strategy don't have to be secret to be carried out. Sometimes the strategy is quite straightforward( going west, divide and conquer... ), and the 'difficult' part is tactics, since ....

2. Tactics is not the same than strategy. And when you are talking about "discord" chats it seems you are busy with tactics... But tactics never win a war. Strategy does. Good tactics-- an outstanding use of the available resources-- is the start of the strategy, and a solid foundation. And you see good tactics when...

3. Inferior forces are able to outperform huge forces, this is eventually our case. And ,no, I haven't seen this ... yet. This implies selective use of CO (in this game), victories unexpected by a strange concentration of power ( I haven't seen this yet, but running here and there...). Once tactics work, you can play chess... in other words, you can...

4. Try to crumble the weakest invader... Egypt might be the case...And then proceed with next one. Or you can try to...

5. Create third fronts for enemies: Croatia in eUK comes to mind... but there are many,... how? Money? Diplomacy ?

6. And since this game is rather.... 'hero' driven... perhaps with a couple of big hitters (and again diplomacy or gold),you can back your strategy with tactics...

As you see, the possibilities are many, and the strategies ... and tactics might be in front of everyone's eyes...and thus become a kind of fear factor for the enemy.

Just completing the constructive side of a call for attention.