My plan for the APP
•
by An Australian Man
As chances are I will be running uncontested for the Australian Parliamentary Party in the upcoming election, I want to outline my plan to make the APP one of the Powerhouses of eAustralia. The APP is a party that has great history within eAustralia, and it will be this party that builds eAustralia into one of the great powers.
Party Size
Our current size is too small, if we want to be the best in the land, we need to grow. Which is why I will be start the APP's Party Growth Policy. The objective of the PGP is simple, grow our size into becoming the best in eAustralia. All members of the APP can participate in this Program. APP members will be encouraged to invite eCitizens to join the Party. In reward of inviting new members they will receive:
a) 5 gold for new eAustralian eCitizens who join the party for at least one month
b) 3 gold for current eCitizens from Day 3098 (i.e. today) who join the party for one month.
These rewards will be reciprocated for the New Party Members as well.
Parliament
I believe that we could be able to control Parliament within the next 3 months, but in the meantime, we need to start and grow our seat count now. I believe we can get six seats in the next election and become the balance of power. With this power, we can push our policy's and gain even more power.
I will produce more policies over the coming days, as well as the new look APP team which will lead us to glory.
Thanks,
An Australian Man
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
You going to change the name to the Australian Paid Party?
2 problems
1.I forgot to put this in but it's limited to 1 every 3 months
2.There is a wait of 3 months until the new party members can start recruiting for the PGP
Another party bribing their members to join.
Hey adp you better up your bribe or you'll lose members 😉
By going off this: "I believe that we could be able to control Parliament within the next 3 months" and the following parts about pushing the party policies, it does sound like they are bribing people to vote for them (vote buying) and in essence trying to buy their way into controlling eAustralia.
Doing the math, it is actually cheaper then launching a dictatorship.... I wonder if they have TDK as an adviser?
Wouldn't surprise me.
http://tinypic.com/r/ibfkev/9
and i don't won't people to "buy votes", i want people to come to eAustralia and become active members
[removed]
Hey Katt!
Buy me all the packs and stashes when they come up and I'll join yer party.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(Of course that depends on if you actually wanted me. Probably better to say buy me packs and stashes or I WILL JOIN YOUR PARTY!)
.
.
lol
lol I don't bribe people to join my party. You join or not your choice.
It was a joke for pete's sake. Notice the "lol" I strategically placed at the end? Gee whiz, even the Britts got my sarcastic wit and they are pretty dry.
lol its 10:48[m my time and i'm sick. So don't expect me to see it easily. XD
RIP
I'm surprised your all complaining, because remember the article from a week ago, this is just a prototype for the ABS, look it up if you have too
Ah! Some strong words here. 😛
Always appreciate if there's chance to grown up and, in particular, improve debates. Hope it will be something like this.
The "control" seems an utopia, just because anyone had their own idea about any debate. 2nd, it isn't a need.
Good luck for the management!
🙂
http://drjoelkaplan.com/?gclid=COiazry02swCFQ4zaQodbCMKTA
Get the electric one.
ha
Incentives to recruit new members \o/
You must of stolen that from the MU drive a little while ago where people were offered MU supplies and gold in return to fold their MU and move to another MU
Oh the government endorsed drive.... But the truth is never with you when your trying to look clean eh?
I called it an incentive, surely you haven't forgotten how to read mate
And others call it vote buying...
And nice to see you side skip the MU comment when you realise your facts are baseless.
I never endorsed the drive, so basing it off your ASIO comments it does not apply to me, thanks for the clarification.
Dont endorse the drive but endorse the article? Maybe they should have an article endorsement with a * so you can change or pick some points only.
ASIO doesnt apply to you as congress has seen anyway, even though you agreed to it, created and pushed for the agreement.
Thanks for that, I will no longer endorse articles. Sure the government can do without my 25cc from now on.
ASIO obviously has nothing to do with you as you have shown.
The government? it is a private paper isnt? or are you suggesting this private paper is actually a voice for the Australian government?
The government? You are calling it the MU drive and then ask about endorsing drive, so it is logical you are saying I endorsed the Ilene government MU drive article.
If you are talking this one "recruitment" then yes I can endorse whatever article I want, I can also disagree with it if I choose. An endorsement is just not agreeing with what is written I also use endorsements to help new or reviving players.
But if you disagree I can always not help others if that is your wish.
"Thanks for that, I will no longer endorse articles. Sure the government can do without my 25cc from now on." - the above article is the one you endorsed, the one written by a private person.
But change the subject and side step the truth, I am use to watching you dance.
Can someone call Drama Alert, this is some real beef happening here
Sure no problems, try reading it again as you have read the wrong response and moved the goalposts to benefit your discussion point
When did we do that
AAM, the comment he made about the MUs was a stab at me. During Ilene's term we tried to bring in alot of the smaller MUs into the bigger ones. This would prevent the disused ones being sold to overseas players who might use them for a MTO.
The fact incentives were used to have them disband their MUs is apparently a sticking point for Guag. Unsure how an MU effects the role of the government and law voting... And if you ask anyone in the CFH, they will tell you we dont have regular supplies. But Guag is shooting from the hip with no knowledge as per normal.
yeah, I wasn't here then
No probs AAM.
I was thinking along the lines of you in regards to a 'supporters' package, but more linked to immigration, rather then party membership. In RL many governments have offered money to get people to move to Australia, be it due to skills shortage, population boost or something different.
This in essence could prob work, if we had a functioning immigration policy. As always we will need checks and balances for immigration, plus if gov funds are used.
We don't need checks and balances, this showed on the 5th of the month with the application that was approved
RSU do their own checks and balances, as stated in the past. We choose not to be apart of the corrupt and 'stacked' ASIO agreement that you created and then broke.
😉 Nice choice of words there. I actually did not have much input into the ASIO set-up. Did you know I was actually left out of the initial pm's where the ground work was laid? Trust me if it was mine there would be a whole heap of differences. Try shooting from your left hip as it may get closer next time.
I have asked this before, please supply proof of corruption and this stacking that you so often throw around
You werent involved? I guess that means Dil was wrong in his article:
https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-cp-aus-finally-2594453/1/20
Dill put me there but I was not included by others in the discussion, so again for your clarification to stop trying to lay blame no I did not have much to do with the initial set-up.
Also thanks for avoiding the corruption and stacking question.