Foreign Affairs
5440
So it would seem that Canada is headed down the Asgard/pro-EDEN/Indo's still cool because of Temujin/US non-agression pact path.
This will mean continued help to Sweden against Latvia's aggression, as well as supporting Finland's oil-motivated international peacekeeping. On the other hand, eCanada's three strongest neighbors have unfortunately decided to go with the not Asgard route.
presumed CoT initiation ceremony
Although, like what was hoped for with the recent cancelled attack on Spain, the right circumstances can possibly make winners out of heavy underdogs.
Whether or not trying to play eDavid to an eGoliath, eCanada does seem like it could benefit from a few extra bonuses. More bonuses're always good, right? Barring some kind of region swap, we'd hope to see them somewhere in this general region:
hint: not from Poland
This is of course if Canadian forces don't already have their hands full with other battles, which is possible with ally relationships becoming more solidified.
Comments
War never changes
^__^
Why would we want production bonuses when we can have more fun promoting party brands? I'm pretty sure the one with the most Congress seats is the winner of the game, ainthatright?
probably could've revised this article, but oh well.
Plugson- While you're obviously being sarcastic, internal politics can be more fun when we have such an overly simplistic war module. Although, I do agree (in the sarcastic way) with the second part.
Also, in regards to the possible NAP with the US:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/enpr/2013/01/09/enpr--join-us-every-tuesday-and-friday
from 40:50-42:00