Congress Elections (November 2014)
Cedrik V
O Canada! Our home and native land!
True patriot love in all thy sons command,
Car ton bras sait porter l'épée,
Il sait porter la croix!
Ton histoire est une épopée
Des plus brillants exploits,
God keep our land glorious and free!
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee
Good evening, eCanada!
eCanadians voted yesterday for Congress Elections.
This article contains a detailed summary of the results
(for each party).
#1 The Canadian Progressive Front (CPF)
The CPF, lead by Funky 24, is still the 1st party in eCanada
(according to their National Rank).
The party displays a result of 86 votes (or 31.62
😵.
In October, the CPF displayed a result of 100 votes.
If you compare the results of yesterday with those
of last month, this is a significant drop of -14 votes
(or -5,83
😵.
It can be deduced that the ''coalition effect'' weakened the party.
#2 Military Dictatorship Party (MDP)
The MDP, lead by Xander Kross, is now 3rd in the National Rank
in terms of members.
The party displays a result of 68 votes (or 25
😵.
Last month, the MDP displayed a result of 66 votes.
It means that the MDP increased its number of votes.
The party gained 2 votes (or 0.28
😵
The ''coalition effect'' didn't affect the party significantly.
#3 Parti Francophone Canadien (PFC)
The PFC, lead by Quentin Carlson, lost few members in the
past week, but the party is catching up. It is the 4th largest party
in terms of members.
The PFC displays a result of 49 votes (or 18.01
😵.
In October, the party displayed a result of 37 votes.
If you compare the results, the PFC gained 12 votes (or 2.28
😵.
As a member of the coalition, the party experienced a renaissance.
We now have to see wether this effect is long-term or not.
#4 Imperial Wolves (IW)
IW, lead by Hotelier, is the 2nd largest party in terms of member.
The party displays a result of 46 votes (or 16.91
😵.
Last month, IW displayed a result of 42 votes.
It means that the party increased its number of votes too.
IW gained 4 votes (or 1.18
😵.
The party is a member of the coalition.
#5 SUFFER
SUFFER, lead by DMV3, is a recent party and the 5th largest party
in terms of members.
The party displays a result of 23 votes (or 8.46
😵.
In October, SUFFER displayed a result of 22 votes.
The party gained 1 vote (or 0.22
😵.
In my point of view, I expected SUFFER to gain
more votes.
SUFFER is a member of the coalition.
Vote!
🙂
Suscribe to be up-to-date
with new articles, surveys, ect.!
Endorsements are appreciated.
🙂
Thank you,
Cedrik V
Comments
o7
o7
Good article Cedrik
Thanks! 🙂
Good analysis, although I believe that your deduction on why the CPF had less votes this month is incorrect.
Tell me your opinion 🙂 I would be happy to know your point of view.
Indeed, well CPF being the largest party here in eCanada, we get a lot of new players. These new players vote in for our party which is why we've remained at the top with very little effort on recruitment. After our little episode with the UK, our population fell faster than usual, making for a smaller retention of new citizens.
Although, this is my belief, you could be correct, who knows...
My deduction is consisting of my point of view on the issue (even if I am not in favor of this coalition).
I'm not thinking I am necessarily right. 😛
I just taught I was logic, in a way...
But, thanks for sharing your opinion 🙂
Of course, by all means still a great article 🙂
Sorry, correction: I just taught it was logic**
"According to the results, approximately 3/4 (or 74😵 of eCanadians are either indifferent or against
the coalition."
Guess not.
I think out of a fear that I don't understand, people are choosing to see the Coalition as a larger SUFFER party with all the animosities they have chosen to harbor. There are clearly three parties in the Coalition. Each unique, but with an equal voice. Hopefully we can demonstrate that we can bring value and the best of ourselves to the Canadian government.
Just because someone voted for a party within the coalition doesn't mean they support the coalition. That's basic logic right there. a+b may not equal c.
Or visa-versa. But that may apply to all parties.
That being said a survey was conducted with a PM sent to every party member asking if they were in favor of the partnership. There was a large majority in each party in favor. The survey referenced above was a public and voluntary survey, which could have been completed by anyone, including parties to in the coalition.
Facts don't mean a damn around here, but those are them for what they are worth.
Facts are useful, you just have to be careful what conclusions you take from them. I don't know if the results of the survey are a reasonable basis for either Cedrik's original assertion nor are the election results enough to refute it.
Solid analysis 🙂
Thanks! 🙂