Viking Invasion Pt 2. Ragnarök
•
by Konrad Neumann
While reading the Abrivianius News article President Scrabman replied to the Chancellor of eGermany
“This is part of why we are planning to leave ATLANTIS Starkad. It's totally FUBARED. We gave our notice today that we are planning to leave and will likely do so in the very near future and then won't have to be bound by all of the myriad of rules that seem to be what ATLANTIS is best at.”
If ATLANTIS is FUBARed, defunct, and the US is not willing to commit to it in the future, why are we still debating the issue? We should stand up and aid our ally in a time of need. If eUSA is going to sit and watch an ally, who took a risk and turning its back on eUSA’s rival to be a friend and hopefully a member of ATLANTIS, invaded and raped of its land and resources is not just unethical, but it is cowardly.
What kind of message would eUSA sending if we are willing to trade practicality over morality? It is easy and convenient to watch eSweden to attack eGermany since we have longer relationship with them but it does not mean it is the correct path to take. Current events shows that eSweden is not dependable and reliable. What kind of friends demands blind loyalty and maybe practicality over morality and friendship of others. eSweden asked too much of eUSA.
There are some people that support eSweden’s action stating that it is OK for Sweden to attack eGermany since the “trial” period was over. Germany is a minority/ observing member of Atlantis. Not being on the active member list does not mean it is totally out. Also this does not mean it is OK to attack any member when the “trial”period is over. eSweden never was interested in the well being of its friends and allies since they were planning a war with eGermany when eGermany wanted to join ATLANTIS.
ATLANTIS is doom and the eWorld is likely to enter in Ragnarök. The political playground is likely to change especially if eUSA is leaving ATLANTIS. Regardless of the future political landscape, eUSA has a duty to defend its allies as they face destruction. eUSA and eGermany should also use this chaotic time to look for stronger and more reliable alliances which would serve both nations better. In terms of eSweden, they are too reckless and self center at this time. We should be careful when dealing with them and that our relationship with them should be greatly reviewed.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Sweden hasn't asked for anything than for others to stay out of it. And you mention Sweden towards Germany saying Sweden hasn't been reliable.
You are comparing Sweden to the country that has backstabbed first Sweden to break the deal we had after Sweden had saved them from a TO, and then they backstab PEACE when they are forced to pay Indonesia for a defence system.
Also Sweden has never asked for anything until now, and now you call us self centered.
Still I like a publisher who isn't completely blind in his views, and I like the saying "viking invasion", voted.
I think eSweden is very reliable and a proven ally. They're not asking for blind loyalty. This SWE-GER matter pre-dates eGermany's trial entrance into ATLANTIS. It looks to me like eGermany has shafted a number of people along the way, and wanted in to ATLANTIS to avoid having to pay the consequences.
Quanah Parker speaks the true! Name one country Germany which they have not been in bed with or tried..
On the other hand eSweden always gave its support to the eUSA. It saddens me to so how little this counts/how short memory some people have.
Dude, germany stabbed us in the back ond stole our only high region. they have three we have zero. Sweden tried to be friends and get our high region back when egermany became a trial member of atlantis, what did they give us? 20 Gold. that was like spitting in our faces.