Join the new world

Whereas noone from the BDP or British Legion voted in the UKPP PP election now, did they?

saying British Legion is like saying the navy

Show me anywhere on the RN feed where people were requested to vote in the UKPP election. The RN is apolitical. Shame the same cannot be said of your MU.

Not true. No calls for votes were posted on the RN feed. And if any did get posted they'd be removed, because RN is strictly apolitical.

The RN is a politically independent entity as was voted upon by the general membership about 2 years ago. Any and all articles or posts espousing one party over another is removed...

Massacar that is not true i have many times seens articles of political nature allowed on that feed

Political nature? Like government stuff? Yes. Party propaganda? I don't remember seeing that, all were deleted when noticed.

Haha,That lot have been cheating for years they are the oldest players in the game and have loads of multis, most run the country and they are useless, the only reform needed is to reform themselves the bunch of oldfags they take the game very serious and lack real fun, they are cheats but bad cheats as the UK is very weak. Good luck

Hahahahahah how dare you talk about honesty????

So speaks one of the biggest multi abusers known in the eUK, see you and your lot are still up to their old tricks

For the recor😛 CHAPP1E is a King William/Ajay/Winston/Maggie Thatcher multi

Certacito you are the uk longest players and their are multis as old as you, all you have to do is put 2 and 2 together and work out you are one of the people behind all the cheating going on then you talk about Multis that is the biggest joke ever you have been running multis over 7 years you sad git

Hey Dapper does the name George Hannover ring a bell one of your former party's congressmen who got banned as a multi, you know the one who kept spouting his support for you and your 'friends' as the ruling elite

No never heard of him

I do *not* operate multis - nor have I in the past.

Your post is slanderous!

More typical lies from the king of them, you should change your name to King of lies, next you'll be spouting that you've never had a temp ban again, by again I mean the last time you claimed you'd never had a ban SerF screen captured your ban as V for sending abusive pm's to people

Woo I'm famous

Not really.

Who's multi are you again?

Cool story bro

Needs more dragons and shit

'as UKPP members you are being hoodwinked all the time by misleading deceiving sneaky UKRP players.'


wat


This cognitive dissonance is truly staggering. I hope you realise who you're representing, people have been in your position in the past defending these people. They're not defending them anymore, why do you think that is?

I blame jamesw.

Too many big words. Please simplify

He should look at the people he's defending before he says certain things about UKRP or UKPP. These groups have managed to even turn their own sympathisers against them.

Chappie say UKRP bad and UKPP dumb. But fap say chappie dumb, because Willy bad and Chappie support Willy.

Clear enough, Sambo?

Can always rely on you Roachford to dumb things down o/

shame people can't rely on me to make things smarter, amirite? haha

wait...I just banted myself...

Gr8 article, voted, shouted, subscribed.



Also, I only wish we were as cool as mafia 🙁

"One more vote will help... immensely."
*puffs cigar*

I'd give them a vote they can't refuse, but they literally can't refuse any votes so everyone is giving those and then it's not as cool anymore

THAT'S IT. THAT'S THE LAST STRAW. I'VE HAD ENOUGH OF THIS GAME.

*quits and plays Mafia Wars for the first time since 2007*

After 8 years of inactivity, your account there will be as backwards as your eRep account is

Voted, endorsed, subscribed

🙁 hopefully we can get you your party back next month.

This would be an absolute outrage if:

1. It was true
2. Anyone gave a shit

I notice you fail to mention Willy asking for help from his 'friends' before I asked for assistance as our little group had a fair number of visitors during the election that voted for a Willy. Could you, or would you help explain the difference to me of him asking for help and receiving it and me asking for help to counter it ? I look forwards to your Winniesque/Dapperesque response to this.

Politics is nasty business.

poor Ed 🙁

Just balancing out BDP. Now if we'd gotten other parties involved as well, maybe you could complain.

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) srs bsns

That is not true at all, you are lying.

Ok.

Skimmed your article, gist of it seems to be that I'm supposed to get a congress seat out of the deal, so I've gone ahead and put my name down.
Thanks for the pointer, Chap.

for god sake, no one ever gives credit to the wrp votes I sent over do they?

Some of us appreciate the help that stopped the PTO attempt, problem is that it's a long term problem as Ajay has shown he'll try and rig votes by buying votes, fraudulent votes(our last 2 internal votes), lies and smears

http://prntscr.com/8h6528 learn to img code

Bad apples

Maggot!

Let us take your article and break it down so a proper discourse on why it is ill informed and ill written can be addressed.

"I wish to take the time to inform everyone that once again our election has been rigged and taken out of the hands of our members."
'Again'? Please provide credible evidence of this having happened before, and with it, consensus that it is indeed true from the wider eUK population, at least 60%.

"The evidence I point to is this,found in the UKRP shout room:"
Your evidence is at best anecdotal, to begin with, the alleged underhanded actions of less than 5 members are not representative of the character or actions of the generalised body (58 members) of UKPP members, or as you defamingly put "misleading deceiving sneaky UKRP players". You are unable to prove that the words in your screenshots are conducive to electoral fraud at the scale to which you decry it, if at all. I have not been a member long enough to claim to understand
the nuances of eRepublik's rules and conventions, but I would assume that if it were against the rules of the game to migrate from a party to participate in an election at another party's then it would have been rendered inaccessible by the designers or at the very least made illegal. Ergo until you are able to show us otherwise, this is no basis for an argument and is merely postulating for it's own sake.

"the one true King,King William."
Hello rhetoric. If he was the "one true king" then he would already be king and wouldn't have to seek votes. There is no God given mandate in eRepublik, the only people who decide who is truly fit to rule are the people whom those that rule over. With Consensus that would appear to be King Woldy, if anyone can supply data to support my claim here I would appreciate it.

"Months after months this same group of players manipulate our party"
Evidence that has been accepted as credible and is not anecdotal please? Or at least, an attempt to back your claim up?

If think you can prove that it is true then we would be happy to see your reasoning.

"many of these gangsters hold congress seats,who do they think they are the mafia?"
Evidence or else this is just libelous.
"They are immoral,defrauding and untrustworthy!I hope one day this sinister group of players get what is coming to them."
More libel.

"the only way to support change is to offer support to the one true King William,as UKPP members you are being hoodwinked all the time"
This is absolutely a false dichotomy, you are essentially proposing that unless people / party members (Who you refer to as a generalisation throughout your writing. To whom are you speaking?) vote for William then they remain in a state
of blindness. Untrue, for this statement would include yourself amongst those you consider "untrustworthy" as you have explicitly stated that William is the "one" unstated saviour of your argument. Ergo how can we trust you?
Moreover, I've not seen a shred of proof that William has any support other than from your own bench. You imply through your that the lack of a vocal outcry against him from 'people' (again, whom?) is indicative of at the very least indifference, or more likely, silent approval!

Aside from the entirety of this, there is also the prospect that yourselves may be open to the assertions that you levy against your targeted members of the UKPP. That is not my argument though so I will not pursue it.

To sum this up, your article contains a slew of ad hominems against UKPR members, none of which you are able to prove in your attempt to hold a moral high ground, and you fallaciously assert that there is a furtive cause of individuals behind the scenes in an attempt
to incite a witch hunt.

I dislike having to argue from ignorance, but I do not think that in this situation it is enough to invalidate what I have written in response to your article.