CP Update and Battle Orders Updated
Aus Prime Minister Office
Hello, eAustralia!
There seems to be some doubt over who was elected to lead the eAustralian Government. Perhaps this will help clear up the confusion:
My apologies for the delay in having battle orders posted, however there seems to be disagreement in Congress whether my cabinet appointees should be allowed back into the country.
Once we clear up that misunderstanding, I can assure you that the efficiency of my team will improve.
Battle 1
Fight for USA against Indonesia in Java
http://www.erepublik.com/en/military/battlefield-new/71983
Battle 2
Fight for Czech Republic against Hungary in Southern Bohemia
http://www.erepublik.com/en/military/battlefield-new/71939
Now, on to MPP's. Within the next week, eAustralian MPP's with eIsrael, eNetherlands, and eLatvia will expire. As you are no doubt aware, a number of MPP's were paid for privately last month; our budget cannot support our current MPP stack.
The options available are to reduce the stack, to receive funding support from private citizens, or both. I have recommended that the Netherlands MPP be paid by gov, and a private citizen has stepped forward to fund the Israel MPP.
Congress has until the end of day 2971 to vote on the MPP's, so if you have strong feelings about them, please speak with your congress persons and make your feelings known.
Results of MPP votes with party totals will be presented in the next update.
Speak up, eAustralia, and be heard!
Cheers,
JackTrout
eAustralian CP/Dictator
Comments
o7
team present
Paid privately? none were, some people offered, but it was not needed due to the rental income from Chile region rent.
also unsure if it is my browser or the site your using, but the images are showing broken.
[removed]
I will support 10 more mpp*s, if necessary. The criteria for a MPP should be the strategic opportunity, not the wallet.
Interesting amount of money you got there.
So the criteria should be strategic and not the wallet... but you will support 10 of them if necessary, so why not Latvia? are they not of importance?
Since orders are done from an org, how hard is it for you MoD to set them exactly?
And I can't see the pictures either.
But how hard for you was to vote against a free MPP with a Nebula member, while you are Nebula SC?
gbr she is currently the SC and we have an MPP with a Nebula member (I am guessing your talking about Israel).
Call me conservative if you will, but I am not comfortable handing out org details to someone without eAustralian CS.
Well you could do them yourself like some of us as CP did when necessary.
In the proper paper.
What are you people arguing about? This is not rocket science...
Privately paid MPP renewals will be based on the criteria of the donor. New MPP's, yes require discussion; renewals- and returning citizens of good character- why obstruct them?
So if I was to privately pay for a MPP it will be accepted? as it is based on the criteria of the donor?
Cant comment on what you mean by arguments or the returning CS, as I dont know what is going on behind closed doors.
MPP RENEWALS
means they have already been approved by congress once... Can you read?
Rusty, your party representatives in congress should be able to explain to you what is happening behind the "closed doors."
My party abides by the rules of congress, so I am out of the loop about what is being said.
But to clarify that MPP RENEWALS will be accepted if they are paid for privately? as it is based on the criteria of the donor?
That they should be, not that they will. The article states that the MPP's are being voted in congress. What is unclear there?
Your article and your comment say two different things, hence why I am asking for clarification. Your article says
"Congress has until the end of day 2971 to vote on the MPP's"
but your comment above says
"Privately paid MPP renewals will be based on the criteria of the donor."
As you can see, it might make your message unclear, hence the question for clarification. But thank you for clarifying that they will be voted on, be it renewals or new ones.
So you want to bypass congress completely if the mpp is paid privately interesting.
Please see above
For those who can't see images should insert https:// and then the link, it should work.
https://www.erepublik.com/es/article/cp-update-and-battle-orders-2575820/1/20
Congrats, Filipe, for your win, it always hard against multies!
True, but all solved now.
o/
cheers, but it still makes it a bit of an f around to do that when someone loads an article. Maybe use another image site?
there is a problem with i.imgur.com.
Most of people use that site to allocate images, but a new image site would solve the problem yes.
I stopped using it a while ago, when I did a draft I noticed imgur and tinypic (I think they share the same servers or something as the image address is the same) was out.
I cant remember the one I found, but it shows now and best of all it was free 😃
That is the comment of the week! Thank you!
I recommend to all writers to use secure web site for their images.
Voted! o/
gracias por pasar, chicos,los quiero!
tampoco puedo ver las imágenes, suerte en este mes Jack o/, y los demás que tiren para el mismo lado, no sirve de nada pelearse entre camaradas.
La verdad. 🙂
gracias, Darío, un abrazo gigante!
Very Interesting.
Voted! o7