Join the new world

Dragoons! \o/

Second. 😛

Third 😃

o7

Dragoooooooooons

Awww I missed bingo, nuts.

o7

o7

o7 Let us be judged by our deeds!

Tell me you haven't paid for these votes?

That's a lot of kills right there. Keep it up lads 😃

That's a lot ?

I have no reason to vote this article, and I shall not do so, I do have to agree with fellow colleague WayneKerr though, I also question the votes.

i herd Ergo Deus paid for dem votes : 3

3 negative comments all from RN, feeling scared guys?

doesn't matter what you may write against me yourself, the point is that your articles through a way of getting votes, we don't yet know of, are at the top of the list thus enabling more people to join, by your members saying how 'good' it is and what they get out of it, which is a failure in my terms, and I am sure the members of my military unit will agree, they may also write something themselves.

Wait, so we are not allowed to tell about our unit?
It's called retruitment, I'm pretty sure you guys do the same.

@helpmeslack - you's trollin.

we don't recruit via newspaper articles, we do it privately.

So if I join the Royal Dragoons I receive 8 Q7 weapons a day? I'm very happy with the armed wing of TUP as my MU but money's tight and leaving won't really affect my affiliation to the party, plus the Dragoons seem very good anyways.

[removed]

Not feeling scared at all, just that a prominent member criticizes others for buying votes, yet keeps quiet when it benefits his own ends....

Seems like a well run MU and long may it continue, how your paying 8Q7 is beyond me though, Kudos for that!

WayneKerr and Matt Timmins - you shouldn't be criticizing Sigfred buying votes, he is advertising a unit that fights for your eCountry and well arms your comrades with excellent weapon supplies (as far as I know, the only eUK unit supplying 8 Q7s a day?) which are used to fight for the eUK and the eUK's allies.

If I am correct the Royal Navy supplies 40 GBP and 14 Q6 tanks, or 30 GBP, 6 Q6 tanks and 70 food (not sure which quality), which are good supplies, but are less than the ...

Continued...

Dragoons.

Because of this, I reach the conclusion that vote buying isn't the only reason you do not wish this article to be in the top 5. It seems you do not want the Dragoons to recruit people through articles as these people could be possible targets for the Royal Navy to recruit.

Sorry if I'm wrong, but that's how I see this.

Not at all Cygnus, im more busting the balls of Ergos Deus rather then the Dragoons. As an article vote buying member of the Royal Navy i have no problem in brought votes to gain exposure for your MU. The RN used to do the same thing, until we realized that it didn't actually bring in the numbers! maybe you guys have better luck then we did.
It's 70Q5 food as well as the tanks, and we offer 6Q7, we can't seem to make the numbers add up to supply anymore then that without it costing us.

far as im aware the only problem RN has with any of this is the seemingly likely hypocrisy of one of their members, hence my lil joke

i personally have no issue with vote buying for articles, so long as it is just for articles

....and as we would rather not really on the deep pockets of others as we saw with Alfagrem leaving us high and dry we would rather offer slightly less weps!

Ex-f**cking-cuse me Wayne?

I'd like to make it blatantly clear that I don't endorse the vote buying. I have made this transparently clear with Sigfred and he is well aware of my feelings on the issue. I posted a top 5 article making it patently obvious how I feel about vote buying.

However, I can only voice my opinion - it is not my place to force another players hand. It grants me no benefit to leave the unit in protest and I can continue to impress the issue while being in the unit.

So quite what more you expect from me, I don't know. But in future, considering you know me to be pretty upstanding, perhaps contact me directly and don't smear me in public.

Thanks.

Voted. Good work guys 🙂

perhaps Ergo Deus if you publicly smear this article for vote buying like you do all the others then there would be no question of your stance..

I think you'll find that my article didn't name any particular journalist, paper or organisation. You see, I stick with honest and fair journalism. I don't try to slyly attribute the actions of one person to the moral code of another.

Try a new line. This one is dead.

Ergo my friend it was tongue in cheek and was not meant to offend you, I apologise if it did not come across as that.

i was refering to the number of times i see you commenting on articles slamming them for vote buying, just noticed the lack of your commenting disapproval on this one