[CP Election] Emerick vs Pfeiffer

Day 1,262, 09:09 Published in USA USA by Alexander Valkor II

Hello readers. Today my article is a bit different. Most of my friends and associates know that I have a less than ideal set of feelings for Emerick and Henry Arundel (Pfeiffer).

Well this election presents a bit of a dilemma. The same kind that forced me to run against Glove and Harrison Richardson in a steeply uphill election cycle. This time however is much different. Emerick is running for another term and if he wins will soon eclipse Scrabman as serving the most terms (albeit non consecutive). Henry Arundel (Pfeiffer) has served in the leadership of the largest party of America, the USWP and Congress as well as Terra.

Comparing their track records, I can't find myself voting for the inexperienced, typically arrogant and openly hostile towards the old eUS Mil candidate of Henry Arundel (Pfeiffer). On the other hand I can vote for Emerick. This term he has, for the most part, tried to bridge the differences between the JCS and Congress. He is more interested in damage and being able to adequately fight our adversaries. Henry Arundel (Pfeiffer) on the other hand is seemingly hellbent on thoroughly discrediting and destroying the single largest military force in the nation.

Now let me ask you. What kind of President would you rather have?

As we can see from Emerick's track record and his Vice President this month, Leroy Combs, Emerick is more interested in practicality and winning the war against ONE. Henry Arundel (Pfeiffer) however appears significantly more interested in furthering the divide and creating more hostility, while consistently trying to find ways to force hundreds of contributing players out of the military module by trying to get orgs and companies banned from the JCS.

That is why, among other things, I will be voting for Emerick on Cinco De Mayo. You should too.

Signed,
Sir Valaro Volcrum

PS- Emerick > Pfeiffer. Its true.