and... even more changes

Day 1,223, 05:19 • Published in Russia Germany • by eisenmutter2
There will be a denomination of raw material

We will have the same productivity when working and will only produce 1/6 of raw but the problem is that the need of raw will be reduced by 1/6 too.

So this change equals no change... but maybe the people with problems calculating big numbers will benefit.

The only positive thing i can think of is that the storage need in the future will be smaller. But i think ''they'' will adjust the purchasable storage by reducing it by 1/6 or multiplying the cost of new storage by 6. So no time for euphoria...


maybe the erep-staff has too much spare time


because some guys critizised my phrazing of 'this change equals no change' or 'price will be same for raw':

i will produce 1/6 of raw so the price will rise 6times and will be the same for an amount to produce 1food q1:

for ex:
i buy 1grain for 1rub and need now 12grain for 1food q1
12 * 1rub = 12rub

after change we produce 1/6 raw but because i also just need 1/6 for 1bread the price will just rise accordingly 6times for 1grain
12/6 *1rub *6 = 12rub

earnings from raw companies:
the price for 1raw is 6times higher but production of raw is 1/6 and that equals 1 so you get same money out of your raw companies as before

price for food as an example:
so the price for 1grain is 6times higher but the price for grain that equals 1food q1 is the same now and after the change because food companies will just need 1/6 of the raw