[Wall of Text] An update from your inactive Dictator

Day 2,431, 07:24 • Published in United Kingdom United Kingdom • by Sir Humphrey Appleby


Good afternoon gentlemen; hope the majority of you are well & a mandatory congratulations to the folks at TUP for their successful liberation.

This is in many eyes long overdue and I unreservedly apologise for my public silence for the last 11 days since we’ve had Sir Scott Williamson (BA’s original account). My actions in regards to securing/stealing the Emergy fund has been strongly divisive and I hope I can more clearly demonstrate my reasons by an observation of the last few days.

Before I begin with the more recent events - I think it's only fair to give you an idea of SSW’s historical relationship with our national treasury. Before fleeing to eIreland to tank against us and try and convince them to invade, he had already robbed funds from the NHS and Grant funds in his maiden CP term (which is why he ran away, funnily enough). When he came back, sodded the citizenship system and magically got elected (sound familiar?) he was spoonfed funds by Carlini to ensure he couldn’t steal anything sizable. But even in the extremely limited funds he was given there were notable discrepancies and he was duly lambasted for them.

Fast forward to 3 days ago and totally predictably, no doubt after getting tired of the “english speaking” part of community calling him out for being thick as lead, decides to fire one of the most respected members of the eUK from the Bank of England and cash out with every penny - including manually resetting orgs loaned to citizens to which he didn’t have the passwords and taking their money too. To add insult to injury, he then appoints and attempts to sacrifice one of his foreign lieutenants to try and cover the motorway-sized tracks that lead back to his little ant colony (http://prntscr.com/432esp).

Now I’d been saying since he wanted to run that he was as trustworthy as a drunk frenchmen and that irrespective of what were to happen the term before he would still make a stab at taking us to the cleaners. I firmly believe that had I not moved the rest of Emergy’s fund to a place he couldn't get at then it would’ve disappeared too. The fact he has reset private orgs too shows that to have moved it into an obscure government org would’ve been pointless, there was no other choice.

A lot of his PR men like to regurgitate the argument that cos I took 300k that therefore gives them the right to take 900k (a more accurate figure would now be nearer £1.26m given the loss of citizen’s money stored on orgs). For those that don’t immediately recognise how ridiculous that point is, let me explain a few things. As this is the part of the article dapper & co are really gonna be paying attention to, I’ll simplify it.

1. Every penny I took is still accounted for. This is not the case with SSW
2. Every penny will be returned. This will almost certainly not be the case with SSW
3. I happily admit that I took the money. This is not the case with SSW
4. My MoF knew and supported the move. This is not the case with SSW even with a Serb MoF!
5. I have never stolen in eRep, I’m not about to start. This is not the case with SSW
6. I’ve always been loyal eUK and will likely continue so. This is not the case with SSW

I now invite BA to either return the funds, point out an alternative culprit, or hang his head in shame.

Cheers,

Appleby


EDIT: A new addition