[Opinion]Why I am SFP
MaryamQ
SFP membership has received a lot of public attention in recent days, much of it positive, but some negative, as well. Artela, a new SFP member raised a Congress debate about whether the IES Director and PotUS ought to be the same person, a legitimate question, in my opinion, regardless of how well Wild Owl may be doing with both functions. While many Congress members do feel he is handling both well, and I personally have no reason to think he isn’t, the question of separation of powers seems relevant. Is this really a good precedent to set?
As part of that debate, Wild Owl presented an interesting spreadsheet detailing current party affiliations of 66 recent immigrants. Interestingly, 11 of these are now members of SFP. As I am one of those 11, I would like to examine whether this means anything at all in terms of the debate.
Immigration screening – bound to make someone unhappy no matter what you do.
Although this has little relevance in game, I am a RL American with roots in American soil going back to the 1630s. I was eBorn in my home state of Maine, and I originally left the eUS for Europe on a mission for Strategic Air Command. Having found a community I liked, I stayed until I came back to the eUS briefly in 2012 to work as a supply officer for the Belgian National Army. I had long been an admirer of Phoenix Quinn, and also consider myself more leftist than most Americans, so I decided to join SFP, where I was welcomed and made to feel at home, not only by PQ, but also by such great citizens as Samuel Seabury, shiloh13, WhydoIbother, and TheNorm. When the eUS started letting go of bonuses shortly after this, all BNA SO’s were transferred out to ePL, and that was the end of my direct association with SFP at that time; however, it has always been a party I remembered fondly, and intermittent late-night conversations with TheNorm, who shares my penchant for staying up until odd hours, kept it in my memory.
A (not so) little bird told me I would like SFP.
Moving forward, I eventually returned to eBelgium, not once but twice, with an intervening stop in the eUK. I ultimately served more terms in government and Congress, including several terms as vCP, one as “co”CP with Elynea, and my own third term as CP. After months of frustration with local politics, I moved to the eUK, and then again to ePL when Unity was formed. From time to time, TheNorm would contact me to suggest that I should join EZC, but loyalty, first to Green Militia, which I commanded for a time, and later to Unity, prevented me from making the move. As it became more and more apparent that the Unity experiment was failing and that ePL was becoming a very different place, I finally decided to accept his invitation, and several other Unity friends decided to come along. TheNorm was able to help me regain citizenship, and also helped shepherd some of the others through the process, although there are some ex-Unity and eBelgian friends in EZC now, at least partly due to my influence, who are still not eUS citizens, either because they did not apply, or because they were not accepted.
Maryam and Norm plot an SFP invasionchat into the night
Now let’s take another look at that list. I see five names on it, including my own, that were a direct result of that wave of Unity players I mentioned. One has no party affiliation. The rest of us are in SFP. Does that mean that our immigration was part of some great SFP plot? Of course not! That should be clear from the fact that we are all still members of EZC, rather than Bear Cavalry, and we are proud and grateful to be there. Additionally, while I think at least some of these players would naturally gravitate to SFP eventually, I suspect that knowing TheNorm and I were already members helped make that choice easier. That accounts for more than a third of the SFP players on the list. As I’m sure many of you have noticed, several of the others came over to SFP from the Feds, so exactly what was the relevance of publishing the list in the first place? The immigration was clearly not party driven, and that renders that whole part of the debate moot. Whether or not Artela’s debate question was valid (I happen to think it was, but know at least one SFP member who disagrees), to attack it with meaningless statistics is merely to fog the issue with personalities rather than to promote an honest review of the present laws.
Seems logical
That being said, I join the several others who have posted recent articles describing SFP as a great place to be. It was home to me 3 years ago, and it is now. If you want a place to feel welcomed, look no further. If you want to develop as a writer, we have a group to support you in that. Fancy a military career? You might want to check out Bear Cavalry. Do you see yourself as a politician? Our current members have a total of 7 CP medals from 3 different countries, dozens of Congress medals, and experience in almost every phase of government, and are ready to share their knowledge with you. And if you want great representatives in Congress, don’t forget to vote for BSP, who are running two of our candidates this time around!
Comments
Very nice article
o/
o7
I liked it.
You know, this is pretty ironic; W.O is an immigrant and SFP used to be defending him.
came in with cCc inci cCc ?
MaryamQ is a good friend of me. We were on different sides after eNetherlands collapsed and in eBelgium was a fierce fight between people that supported a union with the eNetherlands and people (mostly members of foreign military groups) from eRomania, eUSA and some other eNations that wanted eBelgium on their side in the Alliances. Some citizens from real life Belgium had to find their way in these circumstances. She became friends with friends from me and after that we became friends. MaryamQ is a good reason to be active in eRepublik. SFP has a real good community, same for EZC. o/
I'm proud to call Niemand my friend. He's a player who follows his own convictions and is always ready to help those who need it. He's another great reason to be in SFP. o7
Thanks MaryamQ! It is time for the transporter so we can meet IRL. \o/
Thanks Maryam! Well done!
o7
\o/
\o/ nice article!
\o/ SFP
I s2 my new found family
Mocking and intimidation are not debate, and should not be accepted as such.
MaryamQ is cool.
MaryamQ is a Political Top Operator (PTOer)
confirmed
shhh, dont tell them about our secret plot to takeover the eWorld, it was going perfectly til you just blew our cover! I was glad to have MaryamQ and her friends from Unity join EZC, and the eUS. The stuff with the ex-Feds then joining the SFP was just a coincidence, but of course people are thinking..Conspiracy! But if you honestly believe that, your a dolt. As well, if you do have questions drop me a message and ask me whatever and I will be happy to clarify things, if you can't trust me or MaryamQ then you will be hard pressed to trust anyone.
Hopefully this article will shed some light on the situation for people who may have had questions,..
Great article
Good article.
In regards to the debate topic, Wild Owl was the only candidate nominated for the IES Director position and placed while he was a sitting Congress member.
http://eusaforums.com/forum/index.php/topic,33168.0.html
There was a lengthy 48 hour nomination period and no one presented to oppose.
He has completed 1 full term before Artela raises the issue. Debates have been held at great length in the past about these conflict of interest and what roles a PotUS should or should not hold. Artela certainly had her influence in discussions. The only role a PotUS is barred from holding is Speaker.
Is it worth discussing again now? I am not so sure. Give me better reasons than a blanket statement of inaccuracies. Why should this policy be changed?
In light of her own history, it appears to be more of a personal vendetta she's cloaked in SFP wrappings.
I happen to love the SFP. very much.
I am not at all impressed by some of the manipulation and posturing I am witnessing from a few newer members. It's disingenous and leaves a foul taste.
Rock on SFP
Thanks for adding your perspective on this. It is well known that you are a friend of SFP, I think. What bothered me about this debate was the apparent substitution of personal attacks for substance, and the introduction of material that was obviously not relevant as if it were some sort of clinching argument. However, your insights into the back story are valuable.
Had the discussion been raised by someone less intimately familiar with eUS Congress and Executive, I do not believe the tone of responses would be quite the same.
In short;
the shit, it is deep.
MaryamQ is cool.
my party is beter lol
voted for MaryamQ
Thoughtful article; loved the "seems logical" image.
Good read!
I'm a bit confused. The chart was shown because another citizen, Arrden, made allegations that USWP (and Feds) was using IES to bolster party population. An accusation that could very quickly fly out of hand, and best just to nip in the bud.
But what does the chart prove? Some of those people listed as SFP actually did go to those other parties first.
The chart proved that most immigrants remained unaffiliated.
It only makes sense that Feds and USWP would be the next to gain, Feds being Top ranked party and USWP being 2nd ranked as well as home to the current PotUS and CO of our national military. Kinda organic there.
I believe SFP gained as many as they did in large part due to the members who left Feds.
I agree with you about that. But what I feel the chart was used for was to point fingers at SFP, and unjustly.
I think it was more to demonstrate to Arrden that just because one makes a claim, does not make it true. He has an established pattern of making baseless accusations. People are naturally frustrated or bemused with that. I can't decide which.
Conceivably both 😉 Thank you for your reasonable responses to the questions raised.
v