eUSA Economic Policy Survey Results 2
•
by I am The Best23
In this article I have the results of the survey I ran a few days ago. I will say that I was pretty excited to see how many responses it got! However, after further realization I saw that many of the responses looked very suspicious like someone was filling out multiple surveys with others' names and typing the same answers. So after further research I messaged all of the suspicious looking responses and it turns out that most of them were forged. After I told them that their name was used by someone else, most got really irritated. All of these fake responses did get deleted. So the results shown below should be mostly accurate, I may have missed 1 or 2 fake responses but that shouldn't make too much difference over 70 responses. The sad part is that I have reason to believe it was even some of our own congressmen who did this lying/manipulation. An example of someone not very happy to find this out:
Anyways here are the results. The number of votes followed by percent.
19 or 27.1%...I supported the tax increase and continued working in all of my companies
4 or 5.7%.......I supported the tax increase but stopped working in some or all of my companies
22 or 31.4%...I did not support the tax increase and stopped working in some or all of my companies
21 or 30%......I did not support the tax increase but continued working in all of my companies like usual
1 or 1.4%.......I don't pay attention to what happens
3 or 4.3%.......Other
15 or 21.7% I am considering leaving or have left in the past due to high Work Taxes
31 or 44.9% I choose to stay but I don't support the current Work Tax
16 or 23.2% I choose to stay and I support the current Work Tax
31 or 44.9% I know at least one person who has left the country or game because of the Work Tax
12 or 17.4% I do not know anyone who has left the country or game because of the Work Tax
25%...13 or 18.8%
20%...1 or 1.4%
18%...1 or 1.4%
!5%....1 or 1.4%
12%...5 or 7.2%
10%...16 or 23.2%
8%.....7 or 10.1%
6%.....8 or 11.6%
5%.....11 or 15.9%
Mean: 11.36% Median: 10% Mode: 10%
13 or 18.6% Yes
33 or 47.1% No
22 or 31.4% Somewhat
2 or 2.9% I don't care
10 or 14.3% Positive
8 or 11.4% Somewhat Positive
15 or 21.4% Neutral
9 or 12.9% Somewhat Negative
28 or 40% Negative
9 or 12.9% Federalist Party
9 or 12.9% We The People
8 or 11.4% United States Workers Party
11 or 15.7% Socialist Freedom Party
14 or 20% The Black Sheep Party
12 or 17.1% Other
7 or 10% I do not belong to any political party
And finally here are all the comments:
I hope this helps congress learn about what the people actually want. I would say a fair work tax would be around 10% after looking at the data. Although personally I would rather have it lower than that if we have plenty or reserves and are not at war. I would say overall this was a success and I would like to know what you think and if you would like to see more surveys in the future. I would have more measures in place to prevent people from manipulating the results. This is not a campaign article so much as it is just about sharing the data I've gathered but I will be trying to run for congress under The Black Sheep Party and if you are one for lower taxes then you should seriously consider voting for us tomorrow! Thank you for reading!
The truth has no agenda.
Nobody who gave his best ever regretted it
-George Halas
God Bless America
I am The Best23
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Please publish the full data (without dropping those entries you regarded as fake entries) so that we might figure for ourselves whether you manipulated the data or not.
How about publishing data from our, so called, federal reserve?
That's secret 😛
Congress can legislate that with ease.
Irrelevant to my statement though. Someone presents me some survey results after having admitted tampering with the sample. It is common practice in all sciences to provide the unaltered data, and provide information on which observations were dropped, and why.
Ironic Kemal that you call me out with tampering with the evidence when I have good reason to believe that you were most likely one of them who tampered with the sample by using others' names. I no longer have those original fakes since I deleted them for this survey. The ones that were dropped were the ones that were obviously and proven forged. If you were one who messed with it then I suggest not tampering be with the suvey to push your own agenda if you really do want to see the fair results.
What a shameless liar you are. What is your "good reason to believe" that I would enter fake responses? Now that you have revealed your true character, I am SURE that you tampered with the observations in a way that suited your agenda. Your inability to provide the unaltered results and tell us why they were "obviously forged" tells the whole story. There should be a legal limit on how shamelessly stupid one can be.
So, how many times did you take the survey?
Your data will never be deemed relevant unless it supports the hypothesis of ^.
If everybody is against high taxes, why cannot these imaginary people vote for congressmen who are against high taxes?
is that rhetorical? cause I know you know politics.
No, that is an actual question. If half of the population was against high taxes, they could send a sufficient number of congressmen into the congress, who would in turn lower taxes.
It's obvious that the survey represents the view of the majority and the only people that have anything to gain by lying would be the people that want max taxes.
See my comment on your previous article. Sampling bias and large margin of error plague this survey.
You sure talk a lot, but don't seem to provide any useful solutions. Let's see you design us a better survey, then.
There is an inherent problem with surveying the eUS population which is difficult to overcome. I think an election is a pretty good survey of population feelings related to Partisan issues (like taxes) and the population continues to vote more people who support the high tax into office than those who oppose it.
So you are changing the goalposts now? You said his survey was the problem, now you are saying it's the population. Also, you assume that people know where individual candidates stand on the issue which is completely false. Come up with a stronger analysis.
No, I stated that it is difficult to design a survey to adequately sample this population. His survey failed to do so in a fair manner, in terms of statistical principles.
If people don't know where a party stands on issues, wouldn't that be a good thing to find out?
You still haven't addressed my comment properly. You are criticising his work without showing a survey of your own, since you seem to "know the right way to do it". That is called whining. Your logic is poor, and you are muddling it with the argument that an election amounts to a good survey, when you should know of all the inherent flaws in elections and party politics to begin with.
No, pointing out flaws in a survey being passed off as a representation of public opinion isn't whining. It's pointing out flaws.
As I said before, if you criticise without offer real solutions it is whining. Period.
I've told him what he should have done differently.
Not the same thing
Lol. Seems a lot more like you're the one who's whining.
Nope. Just want to see this perfect survey that a master like you is capable of creating
I'll try to find the time.
You mean you will find the time
There's simply no way 70 individual people filled out this survey. Someone definitely went through and wrote some random names in. Also, huge sampling bias, as well as asking someone to answer these questions and then name their personal Political Party would create a conflict of interest.
Good effort though, honestly.
Why didn't I get to fill it out?
Nice try, but still bad tho.
The usual suspects are criticizing this, so I would say good work mate.
It's weird that the same people that want to hide everything from the public are so distrustful of this survey.
It's obvious that 2/3 don't want the tax. (That's if you don't count those people that left, because of the tax.
If half of the population was against high taxes, they could send a sufficient number of congressmen into the congress, who would in turn lower taxes. That is not happening, so you are wrong.
Just because you see sand, does not mean you are at the beach.
Just because you don't believe in facts does not mean they will change to suit your fantasies.