[MoI] Votes this month
Ministerie van Media en Recrui
The month is almost at an end, and some votes have been done. This is the overview of all the votes this month
😉
Proposed solution:
To reconsile between all parties I propose that congress accepts the following motion:
Kimi:
=> offended several people in IRC.
* he gets the offer to apologize to the people he insulted (Fhaemita, ArcanicMindje, Garmr) on this forum after which his IRC ban gets lifted and he gets sentenced to 'ban time served'. We hope he learned from it.
Garmr
=> was out of line by baiting kimi into a ban, followed by unacceptible insults.
* since garmr is not a national official, government or congress, these admin rights will be revoked for the time being.
* no further penalty required
Result:
Yes: 9
No: 12
Neutral: 3
Motion was rejected
Proposed candidate: djirtsdew
Result:
Yes: 20
No: 2
Neutral: 1
djirtsdew was elected as Chairman of Congress for this month
Result:
Yes: 16
No: 2
Neutral: 7
Motion was accepted
Result:
Yes: 12
No: 3
Neutral: 6
Motion was accepted
Proposed candidate: Broersje
Result:
Yes: 17
No: 0
Neutral: 2
Broersje was elected as deputy Chairman of Congress
Result:
Yes: 13
No: 5
Neutral: 1
Motion was accepted
Result:
Yes: 12
No: 1
Neutral: 6
Motion was accepted
Result:
Yes: 6
No: 11
Neutral: 4
Motion was rejected
Result:
Yes: 15
No: 0
Neutral: 0
Motion was accepted
proposed bill
from:
Article 2 – Loss of forum Congress rights
1. Members of Congress lose their forum Congress rights upon the loss of in-game membership of Congress.
2. Exceptions to this rule can be made by the Chairman of Congress, who will state the decision and the reason for it in the Private section of Congress.
3. Members of Congress lose their forum Congress rights upon the decision of the Chairman of Congress, who will state the decision and the reason for it in the Private section of Congress. This can only be done after a Congress Member becomes blacklisted or inactive. The Party President is allowed to replace the Congress Member with another citizen of the eNetherlands.
4. Congress can reverse the Chairman’s decision by a simple majority vote.
to:
Article 2 – Loss of forum Congress rights
1. Members of Congress lose their forum Congress rights upon the loss of in-game membership of Congress.
1b. In case no eNL congress is elected during the in-game congress elections, the remaining congress members are not removed like article 2.1 suggests. They will remain as an "extended term congress". Once a new eNL congress is elected during the in-game congress elections, all members of the "extended term congress" lose their forum Congress rights.
2. Exceptions to this rule can be made by the Chairman of Congress, who will state the decision and the reason for it in the Private section of Congress.
3. Members of Congress lose their forum Congress rights upon the decision of the Chairman of Congress, who will state the decision and the reason for it in the Private section of Congress. This can be done after a Congress Member becomes blacklisted, when a Congress Member resigns, or when he/she hasn't logged in on the forum for 14 consecutive days without notice.
4. In case of an "extended term congress" (see article 2.1b), the Party President is allowed to replace each of his party's Congress Members that lost their forum Congress rights according to article 2.3 with another citizen of the eNetherlands
5. Congress can reverse the Chairman’s decision in matters of forum Congress rights by a simple majority vote.
Result:
Yes: 14
No: 3
Neutral: 2
Bill was accepted
Secretary of State of Information
Please subscribe to the Government Newspapers
Comments
A great overview for the less active citizens who don't check the forum. I hope this will give them a good view on what congress and government was doing this month.
Great overview. Saves a lot of time compared to visiting the forum while people like me will be better informed.
1 remark on the votes; It could well have been on purpose, but due to the way the Garmr-kimi case was brought to a vote you could be almost certain it would fail. It are comparable issues in one vote but two entirely different players. One being new here and one considered almost a saint be several.
Would the vote have been split to judge them both individually its almost certain kimi would have been banned while taking no action towards garmr. The latter not being a stranger in insulting players himself as we almost all know.
So if it was on purpose, making sure people would be judged equally on the same sort of issues; Great job!
no that was just a poorly written proposal.
Great work on this overview, gives a good insight into congressional things that have happened.