Why we need a new President
Jefferson Locke
So far, this has been a very interesting election. We see an incumbent in Gnilraps running for re-election against both Tyler Buublar and Aramec.
Tyler B should be the President of the United States because of his work ethic, ability to rally people and lead them to accomplish goals, his cabinet, and his integrity as a player.
I know what you are thinking right now. You are thinking to yourself “well, Gnilraps has a solid work ethic”. Which is very true; when he is engaged, he has a work ethic that is amazing. However, this brings me to my first problem with giving Gnilraps a second term. He isn't that engaged right now. He is someone who was talked into running for CP a second time by his supporters Pfeiffer and Israel Stevens when he had NO intention of doing so, and now is simply along for the ride.
I can’t support a President that was not going to run until after they were nominated in the AMP primary, and that actually missed the deadline of many of the other parties Primaries. That does not seem to me to be someone that is 100% engaged in leading our nation.
I would prefer to have a CP that didn’t have to be talked into doing it. It’s a hard job, and when things go south, if your heart isn’t 100% in it, things can get ugly very fast. He will tell you that he is in fact 100% in it, but here is why I disagree with that:
You can tell how involved someone is in the idea of being CP by how they run their race.
His campaign has consisted of two articles. He will tell you that this is because he entered the race later than expected, but that brings up a problem in and of itself.
One of his articles, the last one, is nothing more than “I love the idea of a second term”. That’s it.
Nothing about foreign affairs. Nothing about his plans. Nothing about his cabinet. Just “I love the idea of a second term.” Two short articles from one of the best writers in erepublik, and that’s supposed to convince me that he is 100% in it and motivated?
You can’t fight apathy in this game if your Presidential run is rife with it.
He and his supporters are painting this as a race all about the USAF. They are painting a picture of a decisive, steady handed Gnilraps to steer the ship. However, not being able to make a decision on whether to run again doesn’t seem like it is very decisive nor steady handed.
His campaign has also not shown that he can lead his cabinet to accomplish goals. I say this for one reason: He simply has not bothered to put out an article about his cabinet. Gnilraps, the President of the United States, HAS NOT BOTHERED to put out an article about his cabinet. Can you imagine the hell that Pfeiffer and Israel Stevens would give someone if they hadn’t bothered to do this on the day before the election?
You might be thinking that it’s because he is going to keep his cabinet the same, right? After all, he is an incumbent. So allow me to quote him: “Not everyone I've worked with this past month will be kept on, some will move into new roles, and I know a few who don't want to continue.” That is from the article listed above. It doesn’t sound like he is going to keep the same cabinet there, he says himself that the cabinet will not be the same. Even if he will keep the same cabinet, the American people deserve to know that before they vote tomorrow.
So where is his cabinet? Where is his article? Where is his ideas?
I could actually be your next Secretary of State, but none of you would know!
He is running on his name being Gnilraps and the USAF. That’s it, nothing else. To me that is a problem. We don’t need a President that has a famous name, we need a president that will be fully engaged. We need someone that WANTS to be your President without having to be talked into it by Israel Stevens. (http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/gnilraps-amp-afa-2388441/1/20)
We need Tyler Buublar.
With that said, I didn’t touch on the integrity part from earlier. That’s because I wouldn’t dare to question Gnilrap’s integrity. He is a man of great integrity, and his first month in office went generally well. I am just worried about this next month. The major problem we face as a nation right now is apathy amongst our citizens. The way to fight that apathy is not to run a campaign that showcases the very apathy that we are trying to fight off.
Copy and paste this to shout it out:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/why-we-need-a-new-cp-2388798/1/20
Why I believe we need a new CP
Votes, Comments, and shouts are appreciated greatly 🙂
Comments
First for Tyler 4 CP!
tldr: JL is a Fed and so is TB so he's gonna support him... No Matter What.
It's what Feds do.
Half of the endorsement articles for Gnilraps are written by Feds.
Got any facts at all to back up your claims that the feds all follow the same groupthink?
I didn't think so.
You both act as if it is a bad thing.
Drinking from the same Kool-Aide is alright.
And there are tons of proof.... just mention "Fingerguns".
lies, all lies...
RE-ELECT
GNILRAPS4POTUS
G
4
C
P
What is a lie in this article? Find one lie. Seriously.
just one lie? thats easy:
direct quote: "We need Tyler Buublar."
WE NEED GNILRAPS ONE MORE TERM
btw screw primaries!!!!
That is you opinion vs. mine. Not a lie. Sigh.
Tyler 5 CP!
See, now you make me want to write an article about how Tyler hasn't in any way articulated a plan for anything, was generally ineffective and absent as Chief of Staff, and did a whole lot of nothing as Secretary of State...Wild Owl carrying nearly all of the workload.
I probably won't cause anyone with a brain would know all that.
I'm impressed by the fact that JLo has purposely chosen not to respond to this. Shows that he either knows it's true, and is simply support TB because all Feds are sheep, or that he lacks the ability to reply.
My decision to run should not suggest to anyone that I don't respect their strengths or them as people, I've been friends with Aramec for a few years now, and Tyler is as close to a home town guy as I've got in eRep. They'll both be fine Presidents when their time comes, and that time may come now for one of them." That's from your article here : http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-pfeiffer-gnilraps-for-president--2387537/1/20
So let me get this straight........according to you, he was ineffective and absent, but would make a fine president and you respect his strengths and him as a person. Cool story bro.
When his time comes. He isn't ready. If he were, I wouldn't have run. How is that logic difficult to follow?
you're more intelligent than this, buns.
you said "and that time may come now". That would imply that he would make a fine president if he ran against you and won. Just saying, maybe we are arguing over semantics lol.
Also, I would reply to Tenshi, but he's just a troll. At least with you Pfeiffer I can have an intelligent conversation.
he's not your puppet, that's a pretty solid reason to vote for him
Meow! ♥
Voted!
Thank you \o/
On the other hand, you got to admit Gnilraps was a good CP first term.
Hard choice.
He did a pretty good job, but my problem is that he has kind of mailed in his run for re-election. Honestly, that always concerns me about what he will do when he knows it's his final month in office.
It is like you never read Tylers media...talk about mailing it in.
Sometimes I look at my articles and think "holy hell, I'm a terrible writer" lol
really, what did he actally do?
p/h
Shields up!
radioactive
congress critter
Miau
Great article Jlo. Voted.
THank you Apollo221 😃
Lold.
well, at least I bought a smile to your face Lemi lol
The reason i want to vote for gnil on a second term: his conditions to canada
the reason i don't: Israel Stevens supports him.
gnil, drop the douchebag.
Yeah but Tyler has taken a tough stance on Canada as well. You know, without Israel lol.
Yup, he's real good at parroting Wild Owl and Gnilraps.
you say he parrots Gnilraps, but yet you in your article said that you were basically going to follow through with Gnilraps plan for the USAF.
So if Tyler has a similar stance with Gnilly, he's a parrot. If you want to follow Gnilly's plan for the USAF, does that make you a mime?
The plan Gnil is now going forward with is the result of him seeing Oblige and his plan wouldn't work, and the discussions had after that...including ones I took part in. I call it his because the President ultimately gets any credit or blame.
I say Tyler is parroting because that's what it is, and I always call them as I see them. He has neither developed nor presented any original thought, plan of action, nor vision.
Seppo4dictator
Decent article. Good points. Will consider.
Thank you, it's much appreciated 🙂
yeahhh write dont spend money to prove thet you care for this country
write as much as you can Gnilraps
with the news we shall win wars grrrrrrrrrrrr
You know what is bothering me the most right now. Is the fact that you all seem to think Tyler won't win without all the negativity you are showing towards Gnil and the slams and down talking. It is sad how little faith you have in Tyler. He will win without this type of article or some of the negative misleading shouts I've seen. Have a little faith. Why not put a positive spin on your thoughts instead of such negativity for absolutely no reason. Seriously it serves no purpose and I believe it makes Tyler look bad, instead of looking at what Tyler has to offer you have people looking at what YOU believe is the negative aspects of Gnil. Sad...
I seriously hope all this negative campaigning isn't Tyler's idea or he isn't the person I thought he was and that would make me very sad
This article was all me. It was my idea, I published it on my own. I don't need anyone telling me what to publish, I do that on my own. fail to see how this is being negative in any way. I simply stated the facts if the campaign and why I disagree with the idea of gnilly having a second term. Is there anything in this article that isn't accurate?
Just curious though.....I've never seen you talk about the negativity from tenshi and Israel. What they have said makes my article look like like kittens and rainbows.
but we like kittens... AND rainbows...
No sweat JLo... It's all good.
because I didn't see it? Yours is in the top 5 I saw it.
So you took the time to write a lengthy response to my article, but didn't see Tenshi call Tyler "bat shit crazy" in Tylers article that you read, or see the comments Tenshi made above in this articles comments. You didn't read the comments on these articles at all?
My problem is that I simply stated facts and you call that negative. But when other people try to attack our party and say truly nasty things about the person you don't support, I don't see anything coming from you. If someone were to call Gnilraps "bat shit crazy" I would jump all over them even though I support Tyler, because fair is fair.
I didn't "slam" gnilly, and I didn't talk down to Gnilly. I simply made my observations based on the campaign at the point that I wrote the article, which is what we are supposed to do. Otherwise, why campaign? Why not just say "my name is so and so" and let that be it?
"But when other people try to attack our party"
"our party"
And here lies the jest of it. While no one can blame you for shilling for your party and it's candidate, it damages credibility when you do it while claiming you are not. It is understandable that a Fed wants another Fed to win. Just be honest .
[removed]
"We need someone that WANTS to be your President"
Ajay wants to be President. Your Argument is Invalid.
I must not have seen Ajay on the ballot this month. I guess I should have put my glasses on 😛
just admit you were lawyered, internet style, and move along