UK immigration Policy-Flawed
Day 1,888, 14:35
•
Published in United Kingdom 
•
by
•
by Master Lobban Le Rub Klitoris
I have noticed that our immigration system has some problems with it.
Firstly the people that are judging who should be allowed into the UK are a little to uptight. It seems that they are turning away some decent fighters/citizens just because they are not from traditional eUK friendly countries. The people who are the judges should know that people in this game like to switch it up once in awhile and will fight loyally to whatever country they have citizenship in. Just because someone has fought in Greece for a long time does not mean that they should be rejected from becoming a eUK citizen, were they would then fight for the eUK just as they had fought for there previous country.
Secondly, rather prominent congressman are not following the committees recommendations. Two PP's of high ranked political parties have approved citizenship requests, one of them when the committee said not to. Even our Prime Minister seems to have broken protocol.
For the Immigration system to work it needs stricter enforcement but it also needs more open judges who wont turn down a candidate just because he has fought for an enemy in the past.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
There is little way to tell those who want to help from those who want to harm other than current citizenship and TP damage. Most countries have systems like this, as many remember how common PTOs were before the citizenship module.
Bites tongue.
@Fox- I can see its merit but what does it say about eUK when so many good citizens are rejected just because they fought well for their old country. Also how good is this system when even some of the top members in government and congress disregard the immigration system?
Unfortunately, any system we have for immigration is going to fail until people like former UKPP PP Nick Griffin stop unilaterally taking the decision into their own hands and start working together for the greater good. The problem is, he's a obdurate little arse and won't stop acting for his own benefit until he lets in someone who causes severe damage to the UK - and unfortunately, probably not even then.
@Sabzii - the reason is that many of them fought against us. So maybe the people making the decisions are not too uptight.... it's not perfect but is there a better one?
@Jim- entrance should be determined based on the actions the applicant have done in the past such as lying, stealing, or ATO.
If the applicant has acted honestly and had been a good citizen in their past country then who is to say that they will not do the same in eUK and add to our society and country?
Better investigation needs to go into the applications for eUK citizenry then just to look at who they have fought for in the past. They need to find out the actions of the person, if Ronald Gipper Regan or known thief's applied for eUK citzenship and he never fought against eUK would it be suggested to let him in?
Known thieves have bribed congressmen to get UK citizenship in the past, often the PPs are complicit and use it as a recruitment method.
We should have an open door citizenship policy for the areas that we conquer. This may help us keep the territories we conquer. Also, the more people we have, the better we are.
@Sabzii - Sorry, I didn't say it exactly as I meant it. I will use a RL example: if Kim Jong Un wanted to become a citizen of the USA, you would expect them to say no. An honest citizen from North Korea may want to undermine the USA, for example.
It is the same in the eUK too. An honest citizen who has never done anything wrong but is from an 'enemy' country should not really be accepted. For example, an honest person from eFrance who loves fighting for France might be dangerous to allow into the eUK. If they have done nothing wrong in a country we're fighting against, surely that means they have fought against us?
However, if they have done do wrong against the eUK, they should be considered. So long as they don't try to PTO us.
@ Jim- but if they come to eUK and are willing to switch allegiance then why not give them a chance if they are good citizens from the country they came from. If eUK wants to grow and get more experienced players/stronger fighters then why not let them in. If enough time goes into looking into there background then it should be determined if they are a high risk for trying to PTO.
@Sabzii - fair enough. However, I still don't think that just anybody should be given our citizenship. I think that there should be something like a trial period where we give them a chance at getting involved in the UK community and then decide if they are suitable before we give them citizenship.
So yeah, I do agree with you that the immigration policy should be changed but I don't think it should be relaxed too much. Just to be safe.
Sorry about this - I'm really competitive when I want to get my opinion across xD
@Jim- no worries.
I'm not saying just let everybody in.
I;m saying more work should be put in to decide if they should become citizens of eUK then to just look to see if they have fought against the UK. A lot of the reasons that the immigration committee seems to be giving is that the person has put damage against the UK, but they don't seem to look past that.
If an applicant has done damage against the UK would it not be better to bring the player into eUK so that there is a higher chance that they will do damage for the UK instead of against? If we reject these players then it is leaving them in the country they want to get out of and they will probably continue to do damage against the UK and its allies.