Join the new world

Already have an account? Login



What is this?

You are reading an article written by a citizen of eRepublik, an immersive multiplayer strategy game based on real life countries. Create your own character and help your country achieve its glory while establishing yourself as a war hero, renowned publisher or finance guru.

Inconsistent Immigration Policy

Day 1,897, 20:08 • Published in United Kingdom Sweden

• by Master Lobban Le Rub Klitoris

I have already pointed out some problems that the current immigration policy has in a previous article of mine. Now I have another one, inconsistency in rulings by the UK government overseeing the immigration rulings.

Looking at the latest immigration Google document I see that one Canadian has been flat out rejected apparently just because he is is coming from Canada. The ruling the government gave was simply that he is "EDEN". This is kind of funny since I know this person has no liking for Eden and besides Canada has not even been in EDEN for months now.

Now I might have been able to accept this decision by the government but then they go and show how inconsistent they are. A few applicants down in the Google Document another Canadian applied for UK citizenship and was quickly let in.
Why was this allowed you might ask if they government had just rejected another Canadian based off of the sole fact that he was from Canada? Well the government justifies this contradiction of itself by saying that the accepted applicant had been in Liberty CA, the sister MU of Liberty UK.

Well, okay that's nice and all but what countries do you think Liberty CA has its DO's set to? Liberty CA has had its DO's set to TWO countries and had taken part in the recent invasion of UK. So while the government lets in someone who was in an MU that has just been attacking us the rejected Canadian (who the government has foolishly called an Eden fighter) applicant did not take part in fighting us in the recent Canada-UK war.

If the government is going to be making rulings on who they let in based of a certain criteria then at least let it be bloody consistent.

As I have said before the current Immigration Policy seems to be done rather lazily and it, not surprisingly, seems to be more about who you know rather then any other factors.

Comments

Raven Anarcho Day 1,897, 21:06

Grampa Alfagrem Day 1,897, 23:50

GDoc is advisory, It's down to the individual congressmember who actually gets in.

Madacaion Day 1,898, 02:23

Also it's down to trusted individuals from eUK vouching for other players. The one in question was vouched for by people I trust, and so was accepted.

Master Lobban Le Rub Klitoris Day 1,898, 07:30

^ Macacaion, I understand that but the reason that was given on the Google doc was garbage

@ Alfagrem- I have been told that PP's might not put the congress person back on a good spot on the congress-list the next month if that congress member went against the Google Document. If this is true then the GD is more then advisory

Zianni Vaatez Day 1,898, 12:45

V18

Grampa Alfagrem Day 1,898, 14:15

That again depends on the individual PP.

Elle Roslin Day 1,898, 14:33

I wasn't aware we had a policy (anymore)

surferdude Day 1,898, 21:42

The immigration policy should be looser.
If they wanted to spy, they would just start a multi in the eUK.

Topher Fair Day 1,899, 05:42

Apply to be a citizenship judge. BigAnt has the spreadsheet right now.

Zianni Vaatez Day 1,899, 11:39

The problem is, Sabzii can't be a citizenship judge. He's clearly complaining because his groupie/follower didn't get into eUK. It's just bias on his part.

Sabzii was originally in Liberty CA before he moved to eUK, so does this mean he shouldn't have been let into eUK?

Spygon Day 1,899, 13:39

I agree with roz the eUK immigration control has become a joke.

Post your comment