[Feds] Why we lead?
Day 1,935, 13:06
•
Published in USA 
•
by
•
by Tiacha
First article in a while for me, shocker. But I'm feeling a bit p/h and felt like sharing why the Feds are awesome and why we lead, rather than follow.
Because we can.
Because we are awesome.
Because Rise created us.
Because the PROFIT told us to.
Because Lockeism inspires us
Because Fingerguns is our queen.
Because Dunks is a spammer.
Because Cromstar is the star of Congress
Because Gaius Julius had two hats and knew how to wear them well.
Because Kody5 is an endless ball of energy.
Because Molly Emma tells it like it is.
Because Paul Proteus is an elitist
Because Enterawesome is cute. :3
Because Bill Brasky was a son of a b***h
Because Kyle321n didn't make us the Nationalist Party. He eventually realized we are way to p/h for that shit and became on of us.
Because Greene12 is relentless.
Because we have awesome noobs like Sinaaria.
Feds lead because we were born this way. Because we are GREATNESS. End of Story.
Become ONE OF US. Join the Feds today!
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Because we have Tiacha
This is all true.
would one of the Fed leaders point me to the statute/regulation/law which establishes and regulates the IES.
Would one of the Fed leaders kindly advise if the new amendments to immigration proceedures, whereby essentially all non TWO players are granted citizenship, are currently in effect?
Would one of the Fed leaders kindly advise why the resignation of our former Director of IES was kept a secret, as well as debate and voting for a replacement.
These aren't scandals. I simply wish to learn more about how our team operates. Thanks in advance.
This was the original "Formal Regulations for IES and Immigration"
It was then officially added to the eUS Code by passage of this act for issues of clarity.
It was reformed on January 5th 2013 with this vote that "Set up ATO Immigration for all applicants from non-TWO countries"
I cannot tell you why the resignation/appointing was a secret, because I simply do not know. The resignation and appointing of the IES Director could simply have happened behind closed doors because that is where the topics were started.
Pato: The laws you point to were familiar to me. They do not establish the service called IES and, indeed, assume that such a service already exists and that there is a known proceedure for the appointment of its Director and the regulation of the service. I have been asking this question for some time now. I'm puzzled that no one is able to point to how IES was established, how it is regulated and overseen. It is a bit troubling given that so very much is made of "illegal" citizens grants.
The new reformed immigration proceedure seems to have had no publicity at all, though it appears to be a marked departure from the previous regime. Moreover, there really is no clear text of just what the reform actually comprises. Again, in view of the enormous importance of this topic to domestic politics, it seems bizarrely opaque. This absence of transparency may be the result of a culture of secrecy, crisis, fear and overconfidence. Perhaps I am mistaken.
the transparency thing is important to things like the recent citizenship grant to Marko Aberst. Citizenship was granted by a Fed namely Kody5. But the applicant didn't appear on the list of approved immigrants. Maybe there is a reason for that. It has happened a few times in the past days that established Unity congressmen have granted citizenships to people not on the approved list. A rational justification probably exists, it is just that I haven't been told what it is. Since the fed leads, I thought you could tell me - and I could learn.
Because we have Tiacha X2
P/H