UN Election Fraud Scandal!!!!
•
by Petz
Over the past few days, the majority of eCanada has been caught up in the SdC case and the pathetic attempt of Chucky to repay the UN for their support in the last CP election. During this time, not much attention was paid to other UN candidates. Well Folks, it appears as if the UN is attempting to steal the election by running multis. Their candidate, Wario Lemieux, who is running for election in Yukon has been banned for being a multi.
Is this really surprising? NO!! A few weeks back, the UN was publically celebrating their growing number of members. I conducted a study and noticed that many of these new members had become inactive, including Wario Lemieux. When questioned about the potential existance of multis, the UN denied any activity despite the appearance of several multis within their ranks. Is it convient that the UN is hoping to use strategic voting to gain more seats? Of course not because they are prepared to utilize their multis in an attempt to steal seats.
If this is an isolated case (as I am sure they will claim), a more important question is why is their party not screening their candidates. Is this the same type of screening that went into their congress members giving citizenship to traitors? Do not fall for their propaganda, this party has demonstrated many times that they are not willing to do the right thing for our nation but rather they engage in questionable activity over and over. Today on election day, use your vote wisely, look at all candidates from all parties and vote for those that will work for eCanada and not for their own questionable reasons and goals.
Until the UN can show all of eCanada that they are not engaging in such action or until they can at least monitor and control the rogue elements within their ranks...can you afford to trust their party with your votes.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Douchebags
Uh oh...
As if that party wasn't a terrifying enough prospect as is. Wonderous.
Cheater, cheater poutine eater.
I respect the RL Quebec Nation and what it stands for. I find it abhorrent that an in-game faction of PTO'ers are hiding behind this issue and wrap themselves in the martyr role of persecuted heritage when the UN is challenged about demographics within their membership that are hostile.
It isn't about "French" in a RL sense, its about eRep threats to eCanada.
I don't know how many flags have to pop up before something serious is done about it.
Addy Lawrence
Wario Lemieux is not an active player in the forums or anywhere else, we don't even know him... He presented hiself for I don't know the reasons but still, this don't mean we're all cheaters. It's not because one of us, a stranger, is multi-accounting that all the other are too. Think about it!
Congress requires members that practice due diligence. If the careless management of the UN party members is indicative of the quality of people you are sending to congress, we are in trouble.
damnit petz damnit
ROAR!
Yet you let him run for Congress pandobox, just like you are letting a Channer run in your party
UN is a national security liability.
Its funny, really.
I said that they were a threat to our nation the day they started, and nobody listened. For that matter, I was called a paranoid by a certain someone in this thread :/
My advice from months ago was the nipe them in the bud with a PTO, but this was seen as a "Rash" action by many of the High profile eCanadians, the sameones fighting against the UN now.
BTW I vote-tanked with my Org's
(I have 2)
well am a regullar in the union nasional forum nd am frnds wiff sum un leaders nd i can tell dat our leaders dosent nose who wario lemioux is lol
nd in all their artickels they asks us the members who livs in yukon 2 vote 4 nic007 lol
i fink any1 can join a party nd then b a congress candidate wiffout havign the approvall off the party leaders dats wut happened in dis case lol
@sean92 considering that wario was a multi with very low experience points it would have been super easy for the UN to put up another candidate in order to block his candidancy.
The Petz Press a dit : ''Until the UN can show all of eCanada that they are not engaging in such action or until they can at least monitor and control the rogue elements within their ranks...can you afford to trust their party with your votes.''
Guilty until proven innocent !? C'est stupide.
Guilt has nothing to do with trust.
Quand on se vautre dans les préjugés, la confiance n'a rien à voir avec les faits.
" Instead of demanding respect, we should at least try to earn some."
A newbie got on the ballot because the party did poorly at placing candidates and he happened to be a multi.
This is not a scandal, this is simply less than optimal organization for this election. Not very happy about it (when you've always gotta do things yourself...)
Becareful of what you say Petz, as the UN will report you at any time possible.
Thus, know their evergrowing Censorship agenda, they will report you for false accusations.
Petz : "Over the past few days, the majority of eCanada has been caught up in the SdC case and the pathetic attempt of Chucky to repay the UN for their support in the last CP election"
We are standing at our brother side and he have nothing to repay to the UN. The justice has talk and we must accept the verdict.
If one day i'm stupid as petz is, please confine me in coffin until i die!
Petz only stays in the coffin when the sun is up.
Voted
" Do not fall for their propaganda, this party has demonstrated many times that they are not willing to do the right thing for our nation but rather they engage in questionable activity over and over"
Lol calm down son. I think you are a bit exaggerating here. Using demagogic methods won't do you any good. Your judgement is not entirely fair. In truth, don't take it personaly but I think you have not the slightest clue of what is happening or what is being said in our party. You have not read the political program (also available in English), you are not on the forum and you do not read any of our articles. Which means that you are misinformed and consequently, can not make a good analysis.