[SColbert] Why Can’t SFP Connect With the Average Citizen?
SColbert
Hello Nation,
This past presidential election was one of more contested we have seen in a long time. It pitted Senry, Ilene Dover, and Derphoof against each other, in what promised to be one an exciting exchange of ideas, and ideologies. Senry ran as someone who had seen the system up close and promised to make changes that would make eRep more interesting for everyone. Ilene Dover was a candidate determined to shake up the ways we have been doing things. She wanted to bring new players into the government, and make real change to what she sees as a stagnant eGov.
Finally there was Derphoof. When Gnilraps asked all the candidates who had the best chance of winning. Senry and Ilene in their public statements both made it clear that they thought Derphoof had the worst chance of winning the election. And when asked who was most connected to the average citizen both Senry and Ilene made it clear that they thought they were more in touch. Derphoof’s chances were tossed aside because both candidates were operating on an outdated, and flawed view of who the average citizen in the eUS is. Senry was unable to even capture the support of his own party, and Ilene who ran as a populist of sorts seems to not even know what it is the people want.
This is where SFP comes in. They have long proclaimed themselves to be the voices of “the people.” One of their most outspoken members, Franklin Stone, will often go out of his way to say that absurd majorities of the people agree with his exact thoughts. What is actually happening here is that SFP has gotten themselves stuck in a bubble, and missed the train on who the average citizen is. The average citizen isn’t a new player who just started out. No it’s a player that’s been around the block a few times here. It’s a player who has established ties to our community, and knows who is just talking the usual B.S. of how they are going to change things. In fact if I were to pick out someone who might be considered the representative of the average citizen here, I wouldn’t look at anyone in SFP, and probably toward a Fed like Yui, Kody, or even Paul.
SFP has become so consumed with being anti-establishment, that they haven’t realized that those they consider to be the establishment are just the same people they claim to speak for. It’s no wonder those who self-identify themselves as the opposition (SFP/BSP) only ever combined to get around the upper 30% at best in congressional elections. Meanwhile those who they rail against (Feds/USWP) consistently represent over 50% of the vote.
This is what Ilene recently had to say at about which candidate connects with the average citizen the best:
This is how severely SFP has deluded themselves. If SFP actually wants to start connecting with “normal people” they need to get off their high horse. The average citizen does not care about how principled of a stand you take against the defensive dictatorship. They hate that you are stuck up, and dismissive to those who use our country’s forum. They do not like how you think everything that this country has built needs to be torn down, and rebuilt so it satisfies your own view of how things should be.
People want change, but not the kind you’re selling. People want to be engaged, they do not want to be coddled, as you seem to view people. SFP scares people from becoming part of the larger community by telling them anyone who is not a part of their club (AKA their eternal boogeyman the eUS forums) is out to get them, and will attack them personally. The SFP’s change is one of isolation, and insular thinking. This thinking has caused you to shed players with promise like, Tom Cauchon, and great players like Gnilraps and Azazel.
SFP you do not represent the average citizen. You might have at one point, but that day has long gone. You have become a club of insulated elitists in your own right. Listen to the voters, and change!
Comments
Take a chance, make a change...
somewhat time, but isn't Franklin an extremely active Forum poster, as well as several other "leaders"?
Great analysis!
Partisan in the intended message, but still, you got to appreciate at least some of the points made.
Some points are quite clear, but some of these arguments are kinda weird. Listen to the voters?
Ctrl F "Tom Cauchon". Shocking. Thanks for the shoutout. I'm starting to feel Tenshibo already....
Do I even need to refute this?
SColbert you make these too easy!
You're just so out of touch with the average citizen!
I'll have to write in response.
>mfw i'm apparently average
Et tu, Colbert?
I've always thought of you as average.
Yui confirmed for average
Even I, too, am hurt.
Great article. Surprised anyone could muster the time to write this out. Thank you for your service!
In the last congressional elections about 20% of the voters voted SFP, about 54% voted Fed/USWP. The average citizen doesn't vote (about 80%, 1,627 non voters out of 2,031 citizens). So indeed SFP is not representing the average citizen. About 11% of the citizens did vote for Fed/USWP and about 9% did vote for SFP/BSP/WTP.
Derphoof got the Feds, USWP and WTP behind him. Those parties got in last congress elections with 266 votes, about 65% of the votes. For the presidency Derphoof got 183 votes (48.41% of the votes). He won the presidency (nothing against that) but does that say the average citizen is with USWP/Feds?
What we can say is that the overwhelming majority didn't vote and that Derphoof got much less votes than the parties that supported him had in the congress elections and that it is very difficult to say if USWP/Feds do have the average citizen's support.
I do think some shake up is needed to get the average citizen active.
Don't assume we actually have 2k players. Accounts don't die anymore.
I know a lot of those 2k citizens do not play, however many do die (I witness that in my friend list), but it seems they are resurrected a lot.
What is for sure less did vote for the presidency than for the congress elections this month.
how long before there are more active former players on the forum than active game players on the forum?
much like that now really. Many active in the forum are not so active in the game.
Don't forget about Cerb too
I do remember. How much members has his party now and has your party still good relations with his party?
I try to forget. I voted for him, I voted for change but when he was elected he acted like a dictator. Not the change I voted for...
Fake news from a fake Worker.
Howbow dah?
Your memes are garbage.
Bite me xD
whoa i must have missed some good drama.
voted. SFP have had their heads up their asses for a long time
And Feds business is all about heads and asses, right?
this was a subpar comeback
I do agree with parts of what you have said. However being thats the SFP is the third ranked party in the eUS, saying that they do not connect with the average player is a stretch. It is true, that sometimes some people do get consumed with being 'anti-establishment' they don't even realize they are making a bad decision and that there is a reason the 'majority' is the 'majority' because they are trying to do the right thing. That said, I think the SFP is one of the most broad and democratic parties in eRep as far as members go. People in the SFP should never be afraid to speak up and they have shown that most are not. 😃
The problem being that the vast majority of SFP members don't know how to stop 'speaking up'. So what they are saying comes out without forethought or critical reasoning.
I wouldn't agree that it's the 'vast majority' , more so a minority of vocal members who are very outspoken publicly. Which leads people to often conclude, tho incorrectly, that those are a majority. Internally it's a different story. The answer is for more of the veteran, old time players to be more outspoken publicly. People like myself, but that is a fault that is mine to own up to.
You give us ~20 examples to look at in Congress over the course of a year. The vast majority are garbage.
Nothing else matters.
Life is ours, we live it our way
Every day for us, something new
Open mind for a different view
And nothing else matters
You have done an excellent job of taking RL political commentary of the past ~8 months and haphazardly applying it to a somewhat-not-really analogous virtual reality sim. That being said 4/10.
Oh gosh are you really this out of the loop?
Yes
So, we took your article to heart and had a really great discussion, but there's some stuff that's a bit off.
This was our best month in a while. ID did better than me, we got more votes than we have in a while. To say this is proof of latge failure is a bit of a stretch, to say there's stuff we could work on? Most assuredly. One of the points I thought were really important is the lack of new players: they don't exist. Phil is great about getting them in, and will holler to let us know so we can make it as easy as possible for them, but this game is dying for a reason, new players just can't compete in almost any module, and the two they can compete in have either little rewards(Media) or are intensive as hell(Politics). We're talking about solutions, and have a few checkpoints to get on track for being a top 2 party.
The others I'm really too tired to write about but we're thinkihg, and though in a sense this was meant as an insult we're gonna address it seriously. We're engaged people here, and we were a party founded on the principle of being doers.
Ilene did better than you because people know who she is/
And don't speak for what the SFP was founded to be or do. The few of your members who were here for that time have given way to the likes of Wooky Jack and Jude and the other rejects from the rest of the party landscape. The SFP of today exists solely to complain about whatever the people who actually have power are doing. You do not propose mechanics based solutions, you do not engage in a meaningful way, and worst of all...you aren't socialists. Maybe if you were, you'd be in a different position.
That's a class example of the belabored claims of elitism. I think I'm allowed to read the past and learn how we were founded, no?
While what you say is true to an extent, I literally just talked about how we took the criticism seriously and want to better our party.
Read whatever you like, but that doesn't change the fact that the party you are and the party they were are not at all related. Or that you're basically the opposite of socialists.
Maybe you are a real socialist Pfeiffer, I do not know. What I do know is that you cannot agree to disagree and you think that what you see as reality is the reality. Try to be more pluralistic or more democratic or at leasts to be less insulting. I know that is difficult, but when you succeed the world is a bit better of.
Agreeing to disagree is one of the stupidest things people can say. I'm right, I know I'm right, I acknowledge wrongess in opposition to my correctness.
Thanks, that proves my point.
SFP molests squirrels.
"Squirrel f***ing party?"