Plato's Vision with Dictatorship
Day 2,662, 06:15
•
Published in Ireland 
•
by
•
by Releasethe Krakken
Lets forget about the negatives of dictators and play the what if game.
What if one could control multiple countries. ENABLED
By creating base camps in multiple countries one could install a dictator in more than 1 country for a global MU. For example the polish army can be CP in Poland and then control a couple of other countries by splitting their members.
What if one could be CP in one country and dictator in another country. ENABLED
What if one could pour in soldiers mid Dictator battle like one could pour sugar over your porridge: ENABLED
What if one could take over all the countries in a world : ENABLED
FEAT ACCOMPLISHED
In tribal wars a alliance took over an entire world and that is probably in the region of a 100000 towns.
These players have old me the way they operate. They hire a flat and then basically play this game with a few friends full time for a couple of weeks.
The position they then accomplish allows them to sell the account if their into money.
But we transgress a bit. the fact is with the dictator model one can be CP in 1 country and be dictator in another but one's MU can Be dictator everywhere posting a regent in each country that would control that country for you and financially recharge your MU.
One can control the entire eWorld.
This means mega MU's with lots of members conquering multiple countries.
World War on a truly global scale.
the Incas believed their rulers to become Gods after their death and that the lands they conquered should remain theirs after their death. A new Inca ruler on day 1 had no lands and had to conquer all of his lands. The Inca system lead to a widespread empire for their nation and he conquering of many of their neighbors.
What ruler will we mimic who will control the map in the end. Only time will tell. What kind of empire will emerge Serbian, Polish, Spanish.
Due to our small size we need a successful baby boom sooner rather than later.
The Plato system
All of this confirmed by the current world number 1 MU from Norway a conquering force from Poland.
conquer a country take over their finances. Starve their national army to death and use the funds gathered to launch the following leg of the empire.
We also have an open ended MU system today. Joining a MU cost nothing and one can do it in any country. So will spartan forces conquer the lands.
Drop in 2 players -> Open the gates . 1000 - 5000 join that leg. Defeat the country . Plunder the resources. Repeat in next country. Make your lowest ranked player dictator . A central system spreading their legs through the world with distribution.
END RESULT OF PLATO'S VISION
1.Obviously more hotly contested clashes.
2. Increased demand leading to rising prizes.
3. Negative impact on countries- Yes but how is the everyday countrymen affected.
4. Ending a country - ENABLED raising work tax would end all production and bring a country to its death. To be used in countries you hate. for example expect Greece to try this in Fyrom.
5. More likely though operating a successful branch so that one can have a steady income from the country.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
They should just pull the plug on the game already.
think the reasoning is we will be assimilated by our dictators and join a bigger mu to fight under their banner. then again the reasoning might be snort ...eyes fall on famous dictators of the world
Dictatorship model wont last long in the game as it has basically stopped traditional fighting, which is Plato's cash cow.
I give it another week!
The second map, what you used about ww2 axis controled terratories is false, because it doesnt shows the contires teratory change, and the borderlines incorrect.
How is it incorrect?
Google is your friend bro 😛
Are you trying to say that it shows Austria as a nation instead of part of Germany and that Czechoslovakia is there? It is a map showing the extent of German advances in Europe. Obviously it is an old map. It shows the Soviet Union. So at least from before 1991. I am extremely familiar with WWII maps. Especially European ones.
Look if there is a mark, that axis controlled this terratorry in 42' than shouldnt the 42' countrybourders included in the map? For example: Where is Vichy france, why austria is on the map, chezslovakia is a hole unit one the map, when it was occupied + there was a slovakian puppet, Hungary received terratories back after the first and second vienna threaty, and when does the romanians rulled that chunk of ukraine. And the list goes on, like where are the little baltic countries what was occupied by russians... whats with the serbian kingdom, when in 41 there was a croatian republic + hungary got back moostly hungarian poppulated terratories from the serbs. That map what you included in your post is a total mass. Think i should go pont by point, but there is so mutch error on that map.
Anyways i respect your time and effort what you put in that post. I hope you will keep on and write and learn more about historry🙂 Cheers mate!
lol I have a degree in History. You just don't know what format the map was used in. Maybe it was for a 5th grade history book where the general aspects of the war are covered not the details so that they would not have to have Vichy France and the Sudetenland and all other minor details included. As I said you don't know when and where the map was made or the audience it was created for. Those are important things to know.
o/
territories might have changed. actually i see one mistake . italy was not controlled or occupied by germany to my knowledge. also not certain of spain did they not have some fascist ruler. then again it might be incorrect but it only illustrated a point about the expansion of dictators
Spain was controlled by Franco who was a Fascist. He didn't like Hitler that much so he balked at stopping Allied agents in Spain and going along totally with Hitler like on the invasion of Gibraltar.
The Italy thing just must be that they were an Axis power since it wasn't until 43 that the Allies invaded and then once Italy surrendered that the Germans occupied the north and ran it.
Nice maps. I like maps.
I like how the Picts fought off the Romans but the Angles failed to. Lol
Interesting concept, I wonder how it will actually play out
no ottoman no vote