[Garmr] Response to NAZ on WO
•
by Garmr
Believing that my comment would be too large, I wrote an article in response to parts of this article written by presidential candidate Azazel Romanov.
Wild Owl has proposed nothing new or substantive
Wild Owl has been involved in the executive since times unknown. Why is there a need for something new in politics? Our country is doing well, and Wild Owl will see that it continues to do well.
Reading through his Foreign and Military Plans I could find nothing but vagaries, a desire to stay out of MU organization, and a light suggestion on battle coordination.
He is making an effort to increase our ranks with capable State persons rather than solely relying on the power of the old guard. Equal to your own pick, Senry runs USAF/USAAC. Both of you will wait and see how it further develops. A great many of our current tactical advantages in terms of allies can be attributed to Wild Owl's work.
In his Domestic article, nothing. I see him praising people for their qualities, which is fine, but the President takes the lead in setting the agenda for our country.
False. Being a good president is about acquiring competent people to outsource issues to. A president does not need to micromanage media, he has a DepMedia for it.
What does he want to do for DoCA?
On the topic of DoCA, he admits he has done not much in the past and tells us he will contribute to it. This differs extremely little from your own words, being 'I look forward to improving the department with changing programs and focuses that I believe will put the department back on the map and improve its visibility and utility.' Where are any concrete plans in that? Do you not have any programs or focuses worked out as of yet?
What is his VP going to do?
What a VP always does is being the second man, and offer advice and insight into all parts of the administration. You claim on the other hand that it is a useless position, even though you currently are one. Maybe you should've stepped up to the plate? A VP is not there to be asked to do things, if anything he is in position to act as a second president, to be decisive, inquisitive, and watchful. A good VP has a lot of benefits, in my first hand experience as 6-term CP.
However, I must commend you on your focus on DoCA. I reminds me a lot of my own election program in '10, where I was bent on increasing and retaining population and merged three economical departments into one. Sadly, I found out the main thing that does increase and retain population is out of our influence. It is the game itself.
The main reason I will be voting Wild Owl is because he is intelligent, quick to respond to sudden changes in the global setting and always working on security and improvement of our position in the world.
P.S.
In your first article:
"I want to consolidate government. We have continued attempts to make government large even though the game is smaller. I want to make government a close-knit enterprise and stop trying to have an over-sized cabinet to include every person possible."
In your third article:
"First, consolidation does not mean fewer people. I simply removed or reorganized certain parts of cabinet where it made sense to do so. I would love to see departments like DoD and DoCA staffed with a greater number of people because I feel like both would be incredibly beneficial for our country."
Which of the two is it going to be?
Garmr
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
First because you bitches always write first.
PERTAMAXXXXX
Thanks Garmr!
I have no doubt that Wild Owl will be a impressive leader. His long list of accomplishments coupled with his motivation to do what is best for America just goes to show he is a man of substance and intelligence.
"False. Being a good president is about acquiring competent people to outsource issues to. A president does not need to micromanage media, he has a DepMedia for it."
This is silly. It's true that a President shouldn't be micromanaging the WHPR, but this is not at all what Naz's article is about. Every President worth anything this country has had has had an overlying vision. That hasn't always been domestic focussed, but it's been there. Our biggest failures are Presidents who take the seat out of a feeling of obligation and expect their high quality cabinet members to completely run everything from scratch. As someone who has been in those cabinets, that doesn't work. This isn't saying WO doesn't have vision, WO is solid, but your criticism of Naz is purposefully avoiding his actual point. Also lol @ the President doesn't need to worry about Media. That's gone so well for our past few Presidents.
" You claim on the other hand that it is a useless position, even though you currently are one. Maybe you should've stepped up to the plate? A VP is not there to be asked to do things, if anything he is in position to act as a second president, to be decisive, inquisitive, and watchful. A good VP has a lot of benefits, in my first hand experience as 6-term CP."
Seriously? Do you remember how he became VP? lol. I think Naz's week stint as lulz VP was more interesting than anything a serious VP has done in the past year. In my first hand experience as 3-term CP and 1-term VP, it's a glorified advisor that is even less effective because it's frequently handed out as a political favor. So neat. Name an American VP in the past year who has been a "second President." I mean really.
Anyway WildOwl's a solid dude and will be a solid President this month or whenever he is next elected, but this is a hit piece that doesn't really indicate a close reading of Naz's words or intent.
You keep appealing to previous administrations to point out how some things are shit. That is not due to how it is supposed to be, but due to CP's getting away with it. VP's aren't supposed to be shit, but if nobody calls them out on it nothing will change.
What are his words or intent? He was as vague as the perceived problems he has with WO.
I've been part of cabinets where fresh CP's were elected with big plans and those too have been shit, by the way. More shit than the runs with experienced presidents with little or no big changes.
Paul is a very dishonest person and a very bad friend. I would not listen to anything he says. He is part of the regressive left so he is just espousing piffle.
lol k CG.
Idk, I only worked with him in eSwiss once xd
Garmr: I feel like those were good times 😛
Ready
Fight
Sleep
I was more interested in my article generating a true plan of action from Wild Owl, but I see he has outsourced the response to you. I like Wild Owl a lot, but his last term was overcome with laziness and a lack of exposure, and I want to make sure that doesn't happen because we deserve better. I will always commend wild owl on our position in the state of the world, but that isn't what needs fixing.
As to your last point, the short answer is both, unfortunately. I want to get rid of positions that have more often been used as political posts and instead refocus on things that matter. It does mean less secretaries and departments but doesn't necessarily mean I want the remaining departments to be bare-boned. A problem I have noticed in recent cabinets is that making them top-heavy doesn't necessarily produce results.
The response is my own, not outsourced. I needed something to do as a short break from writing my paper.
I agree on your idea of structuring the cabinet, it just read like two opposite things. Less departments and more secretaries improves work rate and accountability.
You could always SPIN THE WHEEL next time you need something to do
I cannot my dearest fingergunsie, because I have to register on discord or something. My automatic username is ajay4potus or something xd
WO is just pissed he's not in the Executive this month, therefore he runs. Pfeiffer told him to as well. He's just as Oblige, but worse, with a bigger ego
I am in the Exec.
SoS for life, I know, just teasing