[DoD] Battle orders day 2462
Australian Defence Department
If a battle has campaign orders then click on the icon on the right hand side of the battle screen and tick the square box to activate them. Please remember that Australia shouldn't always be your priority as our allies drop a lot of damage our way, and sometimes it is important we repay that in whatever means we have available to us.
Finally, please note that if eRepublik is in one of it’s quiet lulls (as sometimes happens) then you can always either fight and work towards your Freedom Fighter and Mercenary medals or look for battles with campaign Orders so you can earn extra money fighting. Be Careful though that the moving costs back and forth do not outweigh the profit you make from the Campaign orders.
This is an Airstrike battle guys! Australia MUST win at all costs! o7
Fight for Australia in Lapland
http://www.erepublik.com/en/military/battlefield/54887
The below are links to valuable sources of information for eAustralians young and old, so please feel free to use them as they are there to help you.
Please subscribe to the Government Department Newspapers, Join the official eAustralian Forums because we are here to help and nurture new and young players.
Comments
o7
O7
o7
pls vote these things up, guys!
Slovenia & Peru, what about Australian battles?
o/
Hail DoD *-*
NT & NSW they do not count then?
Sorry that you haven't been informed about what's going on... If we won those battles, aurora would crush our airstrike and make sure that we don't land. Secondly, Indonesia has offered us WA for congress.. Hence why you don't see those particular battles mentioned here..
There are also other things which you are not aware of.. But don't worry, Australian battles are coming.. When they are just for resetting determination and we can't win because we have to protect an expensive AS operation and to not make bad relations to guarantee us WA, it's not battle priority to fight there if you know what I mean, if fact under those circumstances it is against our interests for now...
If you don't lay the groundwork, you won't have any options in the future.. Right now we are laying the groundwork to make us even more powerful in the future.. You have to understand with this game you don't always fight for your regions during certain political agreements..
When we are in Scandinavia, we will have to fight against ourselves sometimes because there will be a lot of land swapping and region exchanging... If you don't understand things like that, then there's no way we are able to prosper...
Thank you for taking the time to explain Infowar. Its a pity you did not stop with the first paragraph - I would have been happy with that.
Pity that from then on you had to become patronising - I am sure there are lots of things I don't know.
But thank you for the lesson in realpolitik and I am sure that eventually I will get my head around such complicated stuff like land swapping & region exchanging.
So if there is hope for me with all that complicated secret men's business going on - maybe there will be hope for you in understanding that the dirty politics of character assassination is counter productive & that people who go in for that sort of game are not respected - no respect = no trust & all plans for Australia prospering will come to nothing. So I will continue fighting in Australian battles & so risking the wrath of Aurora
😃
Just I can't stop laughing. That is politics and team working. It can't be simple although we all want to be.
Didn't mean to be patronizing... It's just I can't write and explain every single detail here... I will explain it all don't worry... It's not so about about complexity, it's more about there are certain things that governments can't reveal otherwise deals can go wrong etc... A lot of that stuff.. Sorry you took it as patronizing, and I didn't mean to be blunt... But I have explained most of it in the MU commander thread... And I will fill you in on all the details in the next articles I write...
OK then, I take your point. Blunt I can take, but not patronising.
Like I said a short reply (first para) would have worked.
It would be interesting to see what our MU commanders do have to say - they also have a responsibility