why people will vote no
Releasethe Krakken
E marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a woman and witnessed by God. Its a religious thing and not only a church to church thing. Due to this most Christians will feel obliged by their religion to protect one of their institutions. Just because you belief every one should be allowed the torture and agony of marriage does not mean religious rights should be swiped aside especially where there is a similar ceremony with the same effect. For many this will be a dilemma as most people have gay family members . One cannot cut out sections of the bible because its politically correct.
Comments
Thank Dhoo I am a Dhooist in this e.world! :3
Not that a foreign opinion has any weight in RL domestic Irish affairs but, as an excuse to highlight your lack of knowledge on the subject & to expose your plain bigotry; if the referendum passes Churches will still retain their right to marry whoever they wish.
Religion should play no part in state matters, religion should be an individual affair and not an imposition by a Government. Look to the East & North Africa where women can't drive cars or walk in front of men by law because of what the Koran teaches, you cannot base the laws of your country on religious teachings.
you have a domestic partnership that fulfills the same purpose its just not as "romantic" as getting married in front of a church . right? but its not the same . and yes my opinion do have the same weight as you the only difference is im not going to vote on it.
You're wrong there, RTK. Go back to my article and click on the link I added for the differences between a civil partnership and a marriage and then try to tell me again that they are the same.
so why dont you just ask to have the domestic partnership beefed up a bit? its always the full cake or nothing with you guys isnt it?
Why can't we just have the same rights as heterosexuals? That's all we want. Heterosexual aren't better than us. They're the same. Yet they have more rights.
it was ordained as much tara. work on the dp.
changes mentioned is a bit iffy. i would say what ancient piece of shite legislation allows you sell your husbands house if he abandons you. what teh vark. get a effin divorce sell the house and pay his half over to him you primitives.
Um, yeah, yeah, look. Since looong time marriage is not only a religious institution. If it were so, married couples wouldn't have better law position (eg.: only spouses are allowed to get health info in case of accident, and so on). I think it will be all about law, because you see... Vatican is quite narrow-minded - in may cases (not like i'm atheist, just questioning some of their statements). And - who cares anyway? Why would you not allow them to marry each other? As for me, voting NO would be a pure spite. Just my opinion
/facepalm in our country we call that a domestic partnership we have laws that allow same sex people to get the benefit of their partners. Thats not the issue as there is a similar thing in ireland that i assume gives the same rights. this is about the institution of marriage about getting married in a church. form a gay church and go wild. after all we all will be judged by the same God right?
Yeah, sorry, sir, but could you please tell me: when exactly God said homosexuals are evil and worser than humans? And even the pope said that if homosexual person looks for God, he cannont judge him. And after all, who cares if they marry or not? Does it offend you personally?
damnit ltaden just go and read the bible. its not that bad really. there is several sections in it that deal with it. start with the 10 commandments and then search homosexuality the bible. and its against nature as well. we are meant to bare children. personally i dont really gve a hoot about the fruits. but ppl like chewchewshow, whs, and hank scorpio is all uppity about this thing.
I don't think we must see the Marriages in eRepublik as a religious marriage...
Plus it's been a long time since people don't get married in church...
The Bible isn't a Best-seller anymore 😃
Oh, I don't know. Fiction has always been popular.
Oh my god excellent 😃
http://www.freedomcongress.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/costco-bible-flap-112013.jpg
yes because they dont sell it really its distributed for free. @ liam tatlock what fiction- read up on biblical archaeology. and if im right i enjoy heaven if im wrong we are both worm feed if your wrong you burn forever in hell. . you just dont have enough ambition liam ..i mean no planning for your after life tut tut. creation is everywhere just open your eyes.
Really? You think a supposed loving God will sentence someone to Hell for eternity just for not loving him or believing in Him? So you only love God out of fear as to what He will do to you if you don't.
Not real love then if you are forced into it.
Anthony, RTK was perfectly ironic 😃
HERETIC (NOT LUKE) HAVE YOU NOT STUDIED THE WRITING OF THE KRAKKEN. DO YOU NOT SLEEP WALK AT NIGHT AND SLEEP READ MY ARTICLES ALL 600+ OF THEM. IS MY WRITING NOT INGRAINED INTO YOUR THOUGHTS...because all this is the truth . Which baffle me as in article 408 I clearly stated that Krakken was born but never will die. Poor delusional heretic go lie down now and think nice thoughts(i suggest article 308 and 234 - those were funny ones!
Of course I will Master !
Irony. Hmmm. OK.
For the people commenting here that haven't seen my article, go read it http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-rl-ire-same-sex-marriage-referendum--2520007/1/20
Tara, are you lesbian?
Yes, I am.
Why don't you like men?
yes she is but i think its more that she have not met the right man yet 😉
No, that isn't it at all. I have found the right person, that said person being a female. And we are very happy together.
Don't you dare trivialise and lessen my sexuality due to your inability to comprehend such matters. Self-righteousness doesn't float my boat.
Maybe you're only heterosexual because you haven't found the right man yet, Krakken 🙂
Would you ever shut up and stop pushing your beliefs on other people. Tara is a lesbian and has identified as one for a considerable amount of time. It's like saying you're only heterosexual because you haven't met the right man yet, which might be true.
Tara is my girlfriend, I can personally confirm that she is a lesbian. Trust me on that.
Xoxo gossip girl
that was actually a joke...touchy much. 😃 well ladies you lose a lot of your fold to the P* each year.
The article should be: why people will vote no: BECAUSE THERE HOMOPHOBIC!
They will vote it down they wont care what you call them they will laugh at your tears. They dont want this.
Leviticus 20:13 what they have done is detestable, they must be put to death and their blood will be on their own heads. But it speaks of man. And God made them male and female snd that's why a man will leave his parents and joined to his wife and their flesh will become one . Therefore let no one what God put together take apart mark 10.6.9 marriage is a very important part of the religion. You are disrespectful to the faith.
[removed]
I'm sorry to inform you of your misinformation, RTK. In fact, the purpose of marriage was that it was a way of getting in-laws, of making alliances and expanding the family labor force. In the Bible, the forefathers Isaac and Jacob married cousins and Abraham married his half-sister. This was to strenghten familial bonds... It was not sacred. To further this unsanctity, although marriage was legally or sacramentally recognized between just one man and one woman, until the 19th century, men had wide latitude to engage in extramarital affairs,
Christ endorsed monogamy in his comments on Moses’ law (Matthew 19:5), as did Paul in his analogy between a husband and wife and that of Christ and his one body (one bride – Romans 7:4), the church (Ephesians 5:22-33; cf. 1:22-23; 4:4). Thus, the sanctity of these "marriages" becomes void. However, they weren't discrimiated against.
Just to add to that "The defilements that dishonor marriage are fornication, which dishonors marriage in advance, and adultery, which dishonors marriage after it has been entered into” (Lenski, 1966, 472). Our Lord state😛 “Whoever divorces his wife, unless for the cause of fornication, and marries another, is committing adultery” (Matthew 19:9; cf. 5:32)
In addition, an ideal was embodied in a man-woman union that was intended to be a commitment for as “long as you both shall live” (cf. Romans 7:2; 1 Corinthians 7:39). This pristine goal was buttressed by the warning of Christ: “What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder” (Matthew 19:6). So clearly, it is irrefutable that divorce is wrong.
So in regards to protecting one of our "institutions" (I prefer sacraments), as you put it, we have much bigger fish to fry.
Mark 10 6 9 is the main one so no.
"The main one" really? Oh my, that's hilarious. Once again, you can pick and choose 😂😂
Aoife, your comment is full of rubbish.
Your birth is result of expanding of the family labor force?
Now just onto the gays and other biblical references. I'm sure you're very exited to read this 😊
“If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death;.” Leviticus is a part of the Jewish law which Jesus fulfilled. As a result, it does not apply to Christians. Additionally, according to Christ Himself, a person who lives by the law must keep all of it perfectly...something no one except Jesus has been able to do. Christians who use this verse to identify sin, yet ignore others, such as the prohibition of planting two kinds of seed in a field, (19:19), eating shellfish and wearing garments of mixed fabrics, (19:26), are using the Bible in a self-serving, uneven manner.
“To the Eunuchs who keep My Sabbaths, who chose what pleases me and hold fast to my covenant – to them I will give within My temple and its walls memorial and a name better than that of sons and daughters” (Isaiah 56:4-5).
Eunuchs are a type of people who do not necessarily live as traditional, child bearing, Heterosexuals.
Many Christians say that being LGBT is a choice. Nevertheless, Jesus Christ recognized a group of people who were born different.
“I Corinthians 6:9 and I Timothy 1:10 refers to Homosexuality.”
First, it is helpful to understand that “Homosexuality” is a clinical term from psychiatry that was first used in the late 1800‟s. It refers to a concept that was unknown in the first century when this part of the Bible was written. Therefore, if it occurs in a translation almost 2000 years later, it cannot have the same meaning. The definitions of the words that have been translated as “Homosexual” are as follows:
The Greek word *Malkos literally means, “soft.” It is also used in Luke 7:25 and Matthew 11:8 in reference to John the Baptist‟s clothes. The word Malkos was used historically to describe, “Self-indulgent” people. (*Note Strong‟s Concordance Greek # 3120)
There is no Jewish bible separate from ours we are forced to slay you in the most brutal fashion possible
Jewish law, not Jewish bible.
The other Greek word *Arsenokotai (#733 Strong‟s) literally, “male bed,” was used rarely in history but was translated as “male prostitute” until the fourth century. It is a word lost in antiquity, so no one with certainty can translate Arsenokotai at this time. Additionally, since the word *Sodomite (#6945 Strong‟s – Hebrew) meant “sacred person”, references to it strongly indicate the sexual acts done in the context of the rampant idol worship of the day.
Unfortunately, and often with the best intentions, it means that many spiritually destructive teachings have been used in the Church. In Acts 10, there was another much-despised group waiting for God‟s grace to be revealed. They were called the Gentiles and they were every bit as despised by Jewish culture as Gay people are by some mainline Churches.
The Apostle Peter was sent to preach the Gospel to the Gentiles, even though it was against Jewish law to enter their homes. Because God had confirmed this supernaturally, Peter obeyed God and did go to the Gentile‟s home (Acts 10:9-29). Peter‟s conclusion was, “God has shown me that I should not call any man impure or unclean” (vs. 2😎.
And then God confirmed Peter‟s mission by pouring out the Holy Spirit on the Gentiles in the same way He had been poured out on the Jews on the day of Pentecost (vs. 44-4😎.
All in all, my God does not hate me. I am very religious and I know in my heart that the Lord would want me to be in a loving relationship regardless of gender.
Now I shall finish this as I finish all my posts of this nature:
Xoxo gossip girl
ok guess we can spare you this time. just watch your step.
Well, that was a spectacular set of scriptural acrobatics to come to the wrong conclusion.... The God of Abraham is not pro-gay rights. The lad supports slavery ffs! You have to be trying pretty hard to reconcile your faith with your identity if you can't see that.
But here's a thought, who cares what the Bible says?
no interpretation is needed i think its pretty clear but if aiofe wants to bring together 2 belief systems in his head then it his right i actually think he may be right about the leviticus one as i know there is the story where some jews wanted to stone a person for some transgression and was stopped by Jesus. tbh i did not read his lenghty explanation the mark passage i think hits it on the head although the word marriage was not specifically used. but hell we will argue about semantics and history for ages. people go to church each week 52 days in a year for their whole lifes . Your not going to change what they belief . All I said is why people would perhaps vote no and its because of their belief system and not because their homophobic. for them marriage might be something they want to keep exclusive and a tradition in their church.
“If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death;.”
No mention of women them so lesbians are ok.
Btw RtK do you eat shellfish?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhEUWobdXqY xD
Weird potato not really.
cool as you know to do so is an abomination
Do you celebrate Halloween?
no weird potato im african