Join the new world

First for freedom!

Voted HARD!

v++

The 2 party powerhouses: NEIN HEIL DIKTATOR o/

but those two powerhouse parties voted less in lockstep than the two smallest parties...

In this case the majority is right. It's not always the case, but in this case it is.

Bull!

The majority of the people that voted on your forum.
Let's be honest; The forum is notorious for it's bias toward the Workers Party.

baw baw baw

So close yet so far!!!

Voted

v

http://www.erepublik.com/sr/article/zabava--2504775/1/20

SFP!

You could have mentioned what was the exact question on this poll...?

Most of it was done in private, so I only saw was the results.

How many were for/against? 😃

27 members voted to repeal the law.
29 members voted in favor of a dictator.

All of the discussions/proposal/vote is on the Public Congressional sub-forum.

Andy; You know about the scandal. We still don't know the whole story, but we know who the key players are.

All of the discussion is available for public viewing. Private boards were leaked. Yes, discussions took place behind closed doors but you make it seem like Congress did everything in private. At the very least, link the public discussions/vote instead of purporting this to be a secret conspiracy.

@ Andy; Where were you last week, when a man told blatant lies about my party and tried to become dictator?
Now you are here to, insistently, nit pick my article?
If you must know; I didn't get this from your forum I got it from a calculator.

A calculator? There are no numbers in your article. I'm not trying to nit pick your article, I'm asking you to supply the pertinent material available for public viewing on the forum.

@ Andy; I only caught a glimpse. I decided to share what I was able to copy.

To be clear: the vote was in private congress?

Thanks for clearing that up LordRaul2 I was wandering why Andy was asking so many questions.
I didn't even go to the forums, so I didn't know.

I asked you a question. Do you believe the discussion was in private or public congress?

I don't know. I don't go there.

So why write an article and pay for votes?

Lord Raul2; I wrote an article because it was the most important decision in my eRep career.
Why are you accusing me of buying votes? Kemal's article has 192 votes. Do you think they are legit?

I am sure that he bought votes too which is neither here nor there.

I am asking why, if you choose not to inform yourself, you write an article and buy votes for it?

If this was the most important thing you did in your eRep 'career' then you could have availed yourself of open source data first yeah?

Well if you are not going to reply then I will show you the same respect.

@ LR; I'm not ignoring you; it's not my comment, so, it's not sending the notifications to me.
Your criticisms about this, are noted.

It is your comment.

Voted! Thanks for letting us know.

While voting is the most respectable way to deal with our issues, I am impressed at how set in stone BSP and SFP are in their yes repeal stances. Why they are so dead set on tying to destroy the the country is beyond me.

Becuase was Pfeiffer was on the other side. It doesn't matter what the vote is for, they just vote the other way

I guess ezCompany is giving each other high fives.
Hail to our new dictators, everyone.

Thats a bit of a stretch don't you think @Ghost of Tom Joad? I guess the people in SFP and EZC are also totally stoked? I myself come from Cannon Cockers which is heavily anti-political MU. From what I see though practically everyone in Bear Cav, guess you do not have the same politics = MU stance, so I can understand why you are so confused.

Cannon Cockers are on the same page as I.
I contacted Hasselrig, after I saw that two Cannon Cockers had voted against the dictator.

Just as some EZC members voted against the bill, thanks.

@ Malzapar; They were both SFP members.

If there are others; I apologize, but those are the people that I know.

Exactly what you are stating is that EZC is totally happy about some new dictator law, making a random accusation that the neutral MU supports political sides which it clearly doesn't based on the fact that people in EZC who were SFP voted against the dictatorship acts.
Military 😕= Political affinity.

I am both SFP and EZC. So is TheNorm, who voted for repeal, and I happen to know he thought very carefully about the vote. I think it's pretty unreasonable for SFP to paint all of EZC with the same brush, or vice versa. Members of EZC had it made clear to them that the MU was supporting the elected government, which is what you might expect of the largest and strongest MU in the country, and one which has members from all parties and several different countries. It was also made clear that nobody would criticize us for sitting this war out or fighting outside the country, which is what several of us have done. I respect that the majority of SFP leadership does not agree with me on this issue, nor does the majority of EZC leadership. However, SFP is diverse, is supposed to embrace diversity, and should not be slinging stones at those who don't follow the party line, any more than EZC should.

My bad. Mary. He did say SFP, first. So, he started it. : )

I count 23 yes, 29 no, 1 abstain.

Where are the 4 missing yes votes?

I lost track and I don't want to visit the Worker's Party Forum.
I'm shocked that somebody didn't write a better one, considering that it was supposed to be public knowledge.

Since you have trouble finding it on your own

http://eusaforums.com/forum/index.php/board,15.0.html

Your are part of the way there, Andy.
Now, if you published that, it would really show me. ; )

Tell me more about this uswp forum. Who runs it again?