[UK CP] More than 58,000 CC donated to the UK and More!
Max Blue
Before MEK TITANIUM took over the UK, I as CP (President) asked my Minister of Finance Jny123 to move all the UK's money from all the various orgs the UK has into one org called the Bank of England. As a Dictator legitimately gains control over all national organisation accounts by game mechanics any money remaining in the Bank of England or any other UK orgs could be removed and used however MEK Dictator Freegigi determined.
However Jny123 and myself agreed to move the money out of the national orgs altogether to prevent the foreign Dictator spending this money on his cronies. At short notice we decided to move the money to my account for safe keeping. The UK's total assets at the end of the battle for democracy were 58141 CC and 0.81 Gold (not including further finances in the MoD MU). This remaining money I transferred to my personal account so we could put the CC back into the UK for use in MPP's once we booted out the hostile dictator. Today I have put 58141 CC back into the UK and 246 CC to cover the 0.81 Gold. Here are the screenshots to prove it:
Mutual Protection Packs (MPPs)
The UK has been signing more MPPs to safeguard the current UK regions we hold and to hopefully be in a position to launch a war with France to gain our remaining regions back should we need to. Until further notice the UK wants Canada to keep the North West of England and the West Midlands. We also want Germany to keep Yorkshire and Humberside, this keeps France blocked from attacking the UK and allows us time to build up more MPPs and to plan our next moves.
UK organisation accounts
As Dictator Scarfar is the only person able to recover the password information from the admins. We are still waiting on them to return control of these to Scarfar and then he can pass them on to cabinet members. However, UK military priorities can be found in this spreadsheet: http://tinyurl.com/eUK-Military-Priorities
Framework for Dictatorship
Congress have voted to accept an amended version of the Appleby dictatorship legislation. Here is a copy of the agreement congress has voted in favour of: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BP4C2rVqqcrQVjqad5oFtG3AzzUiVxhpI4C1xkj1pnQ/edit?pli=1
Who is going to be the new Dictator?
The guy who proposed the bill; Sir Humphrey Appleby, has had backing in the congress thread and so has Mr Woldy. This article is not about the who so I will leave it at that. This is what is going to happen in terms of time-scales (cut from the bill):
Part 1: Appointment of a Dictator
a. A new Dictator can be nominated by any Party President with 10 sponsors from outside their party. This process will last 3 days to allow for campaigning. It is up to the candidates to verify their supporters with the current Dictator/CP and publish their nomination and campaign.
b. The candidates will then contest the position in a national referendum hosted by the CP/Supporting Party in an ingame article comment-based election lasting 2 days - the winner taking the Dictatorship after voters have been verified for UK Cit.
So get ready for some arguing about who should press the buttons on behalf of the UK CP...
😉
More...
I will be publishing another article later today with some schemes I have been working on. Subscribe to this newspaper and/or keeping checking the news sections to make sure you don't miss it.
Comments
I feel like the money you gave will be stolen one day...
o7
So basically you put the gov's money back where it belonged as per your job? Thanks 😒
been there, done that
nice to see it's taken him this long
It is called showing you are doing the right thing. If I didn't post this people would ask: what is going on with that money you had? Also as a group cabinet were thinking it is best to hold it back so it can be used for CO if needed rather than donate it back for MPPs. As a group I think we felt it an appropriate time to put it towards MPPs. I know you are just trying to wind me up, but I feel I should respond to make the facts known.
Yeah I'm not fussed by it just amused by the whole situation.
Cool
Cool
So you put it back after you stole it.
Surely there should be a significant fine paid as punishment, but of course you're not called Big Ant so you'll probably be let off.
not exactly stealing when he took it to stop the MEK dictator from taking it
Stealing is stealing no matter the reason.
Imagine standing in front of the judge in real life - "I'm sorry your honour but I stole it to stop someone else stealing it" Think that will have any effect on the sentence? Doubt it.
Well if we're stupidly putting this into real context there would be no way it would make it to a judge as he's taken something which he was told to take and then given it back like he was told too. And his actions stopped someone actually taking it
Actually, I normally don't post, Sexagenarian, but yes. That will be a mitigating factor in the decision of the judge and can land the person a conditional discharge or even an absolute discharge provided he returned it as soon as possible and his story checked out.
Are you trolling? You can not be serious.
You cannot justify your theft so you throw out accusations of trolling.
What are you talking about? I was elected CP and moved the money away from a place where it would be taken by foreign players just coming here to coup the UK 'for the lulz' and our cash. Moving it back where our cabinet agreed it was needed most (MPPs rather than CO). You do know about the MEK TITANIUM coup...
Actually, as eRepublik considers all national funds as belonging to the CP to do with as he wishes, this money was not stolen from a legal point of view, so the judge would say "Oh, you took some money that according to the rules belonged to you anyway? What clown brought THIS case to trial?"
So why the continuing furore that rears it's head every few months concerning what Big Ant did? If it's his money what's the problem?
Seems like you want to apply different standards depending on whether your face fits or not
So why the continuing furore that rears it's head every few months concerning what Big Ant did? If it's his money what's the problem?
BigAnt also returned all the money as soon as he could.
You raised "what would a judge do" as a reason why Max should be punished. Judges make decisions based on the rules, so I answered the question by referring to the rules.
The anger at BA was due to his betrayal of the eUK public who voted for him, and is therefore a moral/emotional issue. Max did not betray the eUK public as he guarded our money from a group who came here to harm us, and then returned it once the threat was gone.
If someone pushed you over because they wanted you to avoid getting hit by a car, would you yell at them for pushing you? Or would you thank someone who pushed you over because they dislike you and wanted you to fall in a puddle? Because both people are carrying out the same action, so you have to respond to them both in exactly the same way or it isn't fair (according to you)...
Grats on doing your job I guess...
Well done max
Good job Max.
Well done but ''donated'' seems an odd choice of words.
Should be "returned" rather than "donated", but at least we got our money back for once.
Should just make me Dictator.
Be at eternal peace.
If you have the resource and initiative to negotiate the release of eUK (as Scarfar did) - you *could* be Dictator....
Do you have what it takes to lead from the front and make decisive actions?
You're thinking too small - dictator for life is the way to go. Just beware the ides of march if you go for that...