[ILP PP] ILP - Working hard for eIreland
Winston Hope Smith
Comrades,
Thank you for entrusting me with leading the party; I will endeavour to meet and exceed your expectations.
I am convinced that the future of eIreland rests in the hands of new players, people with fresh ideas and energy. With this in mind I have promoted two newcomers to the game to leadership positions in the ILP: Liam Tatlock (Vice Party President: VPP) and Comrade Lovely (Secretary General: SG). Both are extremely active, intelligent and committed to eIreland. We need more people like them.
Central Committee
To facilitate recruitment, shape ILP decision-making and co-ordinate elections, I am announcing the establishment of a Central Committee (CC). To remain competitive we must develop into a more disciplined, more democratic and better organised force in eIreland's politics. I invite interested ILP members to message me ingame about joining the CC.
Country President elections
Consider this article the starting gun for the race to become the ILP's candidate for CP. We have lessons to learn here. For the next 7 days, prospective candidates can message me ingame. We will expect thorough disclosure and conduct our own, rigiourous vetting. The ILP will continue to reject any candidate who has question marks hanging over their integrity.
Only current party members will be considered for ILP candidature. All other prospective candidates should seek the nomination of another PP. I will only consider such candidates that come through their PP.
Congress elections
Elections for the new congress are almost upon us. I am committed to fighting for every seat. I encourage prospective candidates to declare their candidacy now. If you feel compelled to serve eIreland and think you can do that well in Congress, please stand. There are no restrictions on the number of candidates and where they run. The order of candidates will be determined the day before the elections by myself in conjunction with the VPP, the SG and the Central Committee.
Prospective candidates will be judged on the following criteria:
1) Honesty
2) Activity
3) Efforts to develop the ILP
4) Experience (we will actively seek to promote less experienced players)
Our competitors are well organised and unscrupulous. The ILP can only win by putting forward a positive argument for a fairer, more accountable, and more prosperous eIreland. But for that message to be heard we have to innovate in how we organise ourselves. We have to attract new citizens and retain them. We have to build on our status as the party of honesty and ideas, a party that offers opportunities to all who share our values.
Comrades,
Ní dhéanfaidh smaoineamh an treabhadh duit.
Until next time
Comments
o/
Vote
Good luck
Congratulations and many thanks for the investment of trust!
o7
Looks like a good plan.
Good luck!
Honesty in politics. A rare thing indeed.
Very good job WHS, I fear I was too busy elsewhere to work for ILP like you do so well. : )
good work WHS
Hear, hear!
I made no secret of my intention to influence the ILP to concentrate more on effective game practices rather than existing as a vehicle of simple political ambition.
I left the party recently having failed in that endeavour.
Winston this article is a shining example of why.
There is much about methods for expanding your party's political power.
There is nothing of addressing serious issues the ILP needs face.
Recently you 'took ownership' of the biggest theft in Irish history via comment with a simple "It happened on our watch, so we're responsible.".
But it didn't "happen on your watch". It happened because senior members of ILP were not watching. That's what you need to take ownership of.
Grand statements like "Working hard for the ppl" and "the youth are our future" are very effective at garnering membership and votes.
The truth is that ILP leadership publishing erroneous articles, running CP candidates with limited experience (or completely unvetted), and being so lax in basic security measures that our bank was wiped out, is anything but "working hard for the ppl".
Indeed "the youth are our future". This is a very popular phrase. It's not putting inexperienced/untested ppl in positions of power that ensures our youth's future.
It's skilled leadership PRESENT, that ensures the future of our youth, and our entire country.
Over the past few months ILP leadership has shown very weak standards of practice, and being the political monster that ILP is, it's given the opportunity for these weak practices to permeate the government itself. With dire consequences.
I'm surely not the only person who would much prefer to see an article from the ILP outlining how ILP intends to address the fundamental flaws in their docterines, rather than an article promoting the collection of yet more political power from an institution that appears to be in denial that there is a problem in there house at all.
Atm ILP is the bull in eIreland's china shop.
Sweet Drinker, I think WHS spells out very clearly that as of today (actually right now if you're participating in the shared thread) a conversation is underway to flesh out out exactly those specific proposals that you're asking for. Remember, WHS was only elected yesterday. Give us a chance. Moreover, ILP membership continues to grow, despite the horrendous events of the previous ILP administration, suggesting that eIreland recognises these are problems of everyday practice, not principle.
Winston has been a party principal for well over a year Comrade.
And previous PP, party forum administrator, government minister, even CP under the ILP flag.
To say that he is only just taking up a leadership role in the party now isn't accurate.
And central ILP members were warned numerous times on the danger of their practices for quite a long time.
ILP's use of popular social memes is as I said above, highly effective. The party's growth is not testament to it's validity.
Infact it is an illustration of the point I'm making.
WHS has never hidden the fact that playing party politics is paramount to his play.
The expansion of the ILP membership, the increase in numerical superiority of the ILP in congress, the forwarding of ILP banner candidates for CP. All of these have taken precident over the welfare of the country at large.
Political power is supposed to be a means to an end.
For too long in the ILP political power IS the end, regardless of the quality of they put into power.
The practice IS the principle.
SD - people make mistakes. Beans made an error of judgement and we have all paid for it. I was a newb in bootcamp. I know what it's like to have the supplies turned off. But it's never going to happen again. SAWC was removed as the ILP CP candidate before he went on his stealing spree. Some safeguards were in place and they were adhered to. Now more need to be erected. This isn't a mortal blow to the credibility of the ILP, it's a lesson learnt.
And the argument that WHS is political and so bad is laughable. Politicians are more sensitive to the needs of the electorate. I've hung out with the oldies who think they should control eIreland by virtue of their monopoly of experience. They don't give two sh**s about new players; they certainly don't listen. There's a reason ILP broke the monopoly of the ICA and their ilk and it's not because they're a navel-gazing party machine, it's because they offer new people, like me, opportunities.
"Some safeguards were in place and they were adhered to."
Incorrect. Major safeguards were in place, ILP leaders removed them, the country got robbed.
Trust me, they were my safeguards.
"it's because they offer new people, like me, opportunities."
But if you truly are a player with
It's great PR for the party cuz it attracts new players to join. but it is not good for the country at large.
if this game is anything, it is long. NC's should be learning how things actually work from senior members. Not thrust into lead asap
Congrats WHS!
good luck
Voted.
@Comrade Lovely: Agreed. The two arguments come down to their simplest form here. The old, rejecting the new while trying to hold on to the way things have been done regardless whether or not there are potentially better ways. And the new, relentless in it's efforts to plan for the future while dismissing the close minded old. Rejection of the naive new, or dismissal of the close-minded old. It's your choice people, in RL and Erep.
Sweet Drinker x2
When he's right he's right and when he's wrong he's probably still right.
And it's not an insult to all new and old players. There are those open-minded experienced players, just like there are newer players with solid ideas. The shame is that most of them leave or don't get involved enough to change things.
@Sweet Drinker. "The practice IS the principle"... This is the uttermost blatantly false postulate I ever read, It made me choke. As a philosophy student I can't ignore the majors logical flaws to your arguments, the sophisms used and the lack of proper rethoric. You sure point out some matters, but the over all wall of text is clearly inappropiate.
Sweet is correct.
He put measures in place so that nothing was stolen for a year and a half.
WHS has for a long time worked behind the scenes to change how Sweet ran the bank, and who had access to it. As usual, playing politician was more important to him than anything else. And it still is.
ILP carry too much ideological bullshit that does nothing to improve the country. The last 4 months of failures are a result of that.
This isn't a philosophy course Damhnaic, & I've no interest in rhetoric.
I've done not but refer to facts, and draw conclusions from those facts.
As the PP of ILP
You personally wrote/published an article proclaiming that the bank had been drained in the previous term when it actually had a mid 7 figure reserve.
You personally later ran an article proclaiming party support and encouraging others to vote for SAWC.
Which was taken down after someone (apparently outside ILP) warned you.
Ibhoy, if "Ideological bullshit" "does not improve the country"; does it anyhow harm it? Ideology maybe doesn't help but it isn't a bad thing... And I would like to understand how you make us responsable for the last 4 months since we only had 1 month of those were ILP had power.
This "Ideological Bullshit" as you cleverly calls it with much eloquence; is the reason many of us enjoy the game. It created a strong community within ILP where, insted of the insults, poor comradship and harsh
I recommend you also adopt a policy of fact finding, and reference.
Because your performance during your tenure as PP was 'incidentful'.
That fact, and your comment above:
-attacking the manner I posed my points rather than addressing the issues I raised with them-
illustrate the real problem plaguing the ILP as well as anything I could draft myself
language we hear from Saoirse and ICA, we have a vivid and lovely community from RL-leftists from around the world and where we can chat of our RL struggles as well as trying to make this country a better place for everyone, according to our political views wich are mainly shared and going around ethics, morality, equality and fairness for all.
Oh Sweet, you are clearly misguided, because the article I wrote consisted of Malbeck and Ethel message and I was asking people to NOT vote for Sawc. It caused Sawc anger who left the party and so his candidacy was taken down, so I took down the article. Don't spread lies.
Has the ILP ever done anything?
As for the information for the bank, i corrected myself and offered my sincere apologies; I do not pretend I was the best PP ILP had, and I had not much time to do much fact finding. But I do think, yes, a message should be crearly said, without sophisms and fake arguments. I didn't argue on the facts yet because I'm writing a full article destorying each of your "arguments" one after the other.
ILP had 3 of the previous 4 CP's, and has been a dominant congress presence for an eternity.
WHS used ILP's numeric superiority in the Dail to help me launch the program that generated everything Ireland gained over the last year.
And if I got the fact about your article wrong, it'll be the exception that proves the rule.
Can you present any facts to back up your points, or must we continue to chew shovelfuls of political rhetoric?
Oh, we can continue to shew shoverfuls of political rhetoric, it would greatly pleases me, but you don't seem able to do such thing as a good rhetoric, which does sadden me. But yes, the facts will come tonight or tomorow, be patient, it is a virtue after all
I look forward to your article 'destroying my arguments one after another'.
Please show the citizens of eIreland enough respect to present your arguments with facts and logic.
Not threadbare slogans and empty rhetoric
Sure will do!
ILP!!!!!!!
o7
Just to say Damhnaic is correct, the article was asking people NOT to vote for sawc as we had been given information as to his "chequered" past.
Information that a lot of people knew but apparently didn't share hence the new vetting procedures we will be implementing.
"ILP had 3 of the previous 4 CP's, and has been a dominant congress presence for an eternity." Nope!
Bean&teddy ILP
Ronsisu IFP
Thantos IPP
WHS ILP
Saorise/IPP always had more Congress seats than us bar 1 election
SD - the safeguards I referred to relate to the internal ILP mechanisms concerning CP candidate selection. Clearly they worked, if only belatedly as SAWC was dropped from the ticket because of suspicions surrounding his past, suspicions that were confirmed days later.
So this is how it looks like when Sweet feels butthurt...amased...i cant compare my butthurts with Sweet's...
Conway...BACK TO BED! YOU KNOW WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO! OBEY!
IBhoy.....will you be my bff?
"Ibhoy, if "Ideological bullshit" "does not improve the country"; does it anyhow harm it?"
Yes it can harm it. Many real life ideologies simply do not fit into the mechanical world of eRep. Costly examples of why this is true can be seen by the results of policies implemented by ILP on the grounds of their ideology.
Ireland, a country that was succeeding far beyond anything a country of it's size should be, was deemed to be too dictatorial by the ILP.
Strong Governments took strong positions on matters and directed Congress on how they should vote.
So ILP went about imposing a more "democratic" system. They created a system whereby it was acceptable for a Government to sit back and not make a call either way, letting democracy put us in a war with a super-power that ended in utter embarrassment for Ireland.
Then, also on the grounds of ideology, they decided that access to the state treasury should also be more democratic and open. So open that a MoFA(wtf?) was given access to 3 million IEP that he ran off with.
These policies were implemented by the ILP over the past 4 months.
Doing what makes the ILP feel all warm and fuzzy inside is not the same thing as doing what's best for Ireland.
Nice article Sweet.
*cough*commies*cough*
Yddub lol ur rite
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/let-s-have-some-fun--2140436/1/20