The New Alliances
Al Punk
In the last 2 days we have seen a few tough wars on 2 fronts of the TWO alliance. Hard Battles on the Hungarian front and even harder being fought in Spain.
While Spain and Hungary are both dinosaurs of the TWO/One bastion, the wars have presented some new dynamics within TWO. The new-entries in TWO Romania, Greece, Argentina, Ukraine and Portugal had the upper hand in these conflicts resulting in los of territories for Spain and a lot of problems for Hungary. (of course Portugal and Ukraine are not TWO, but they are definitely new-entries).
This would not happen without the "neutrality" of Serbia (or maybe their passive stand against Spain {noticed a few CO-s by Serbian MUs in the Maine RW against Spain}).
Hypothetically there will be 2 new alliances (I am naming them THREE and FOUR, but they might be named FIVE and SEX as well) and they should like like this:
THREE
(Link)
vs.
FOUR
(Link)
Uncertainties!?
US will aim for neutrality at first and they might have it for a while. Neutrality will be the biggest mistake again (I hope US understands it sooner), they will eventually be a proFOUR alliance (Poland-Spain) especially since Croatia and Brazil might be crucial to the new alliance.
Indo will not want to join FOUR (Poland) of course, but I believe they have a strong bond with former CoT countries and by joining them they will have easy access on Oceania! (Think smart).
I hesitated in putting China with the second alliance, since it was mentioned that China will go with Romania.
To be honest I see Romania going after China as soon as the opportunity arises. There is something in China that Romania is looking since the beginning of this game.
If China goes with the first alliance, it will be the first to get the Romanian treatment.
The Turkish factor
There are some MPPs claimed to be unsigned, like Serbia-Turkey!
I find it difficult to see Serbia and Turkey in the same alliance but Turkey will be on the oposite alliance of Bulgaria and in the same as Argentina and Greece.
Albania (and Croatia) on the other side will never fight against Turkey and Turkey will never fight against them no matter what ... This will create another break within the alliances...
Success
The only option for FOUR to succeed is to attract in couple Indo&China + US. Without them, the numbers speak clearly for THREE
Edits:
Dr .Manhattan pointed out that Canada and NL will be on the same alliance. It might make sense for Canada to be opposed to SPoland but this will create a conflict in Northern America's. Another reason for USA to be neutral unfortunately.
In any case these are just speculations, but feel free to comment below and we can moderate this article together. Any change in the actual alliance will bring some fun to the game!
Scream and shout and let this article out:
The new alliances
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/the-new-alliances-2339323/1/20
Comments
firstt
Need shouts! 🙂
done 🙂
Poland and FYROM?
No, thanks 😃
Prophet009, so the rest is fine!? 😛
Prophet009 i dont think you will be an ally with Germany too 😃
[removed]
i like those Girls more than Alliances 😛
you put Netherlands and Canada in opposing alliances? Have you looked at North America lately 😛
Yes, that might have been a mistake. Canada is definitely opposed to to SPoland, although they might make a good ally.
I would not say that we are necessarily opposed to SPoland.
VOTE n' nice review
VCS+shout 😉
Turkey - Serbia isn't impossible, they were allies in PEACE and Phoenix. And a short time if Turkey was pro ONE too.
serbia wont mpp turkey, hungary wont leave serbia. basicly you guys will still get gangbanged.
If Serbia do not ditch Hungary this will create other problems for Serbia with a whole set of countries....
serbia will never ditch hungary, its a 4 year old alliance and only alliance worth keeping for serbia.
And Mx?
e.e
FOUR, because you'll never being allies with CUA.
MX is a big question! Asked Yetlanesi about it and she had no suggesion. (Originall post: http://www.erepublik.com/en?viewPost=12007188 )
It all depends on your relations with Spain 🙁
In this moment i preffer THREE, with the enemies of Spain. :v
Shouted
I think Mexico needs Sex, but alliance wise, well...
always nice to see some interesting predictions.
voted.
This is false.
These are hypothesis!
Your comment is false! 🙂
A false hypothesis.
A false hypothesis implies anything
No, a contradiction implies anything.
And Peru ? 😃
Let me know what you think and will put it in the "EDITS" section
alongside Chile and Paraguay
Add Mexico to THREE xD
For More Atractive Game, We need balance . . .
Like Ying-Yang . . 😛
Voted
+V
v+
You know just saying but I'd have NL in Four even if that means giving out some regions permanently to PL.
Disregard all other Dutch people who claim to know anything about alliances because the will of Garmr is still the god damn law.
USA and Bulgaria will not be eIndo's ally, at least in my opinion, and I am sure to speak my opinion to the government.
why?
To be honest, I also believe that eBulgaria shouldn't be in alliance with countries that don't appreciate the sacrifice that this country made for its allies. eBulgaria has been staying out of the map for more that 6 months fighting mainly for its allies, including Indonesia.
V
voted but i expect boobs next time.
what is this?
a but love?
we wannt boobs
we want boobs
καλημέρα 🙂
next time give us o capy paste comment to shout 🙂
Was right in the end of the article 🙂
The new alliances
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/the-new-alliances-2339323/1/20
Sorry for the missing boobs...
lol , did not see that 🙂
Most of us really desire a change in the eworld, not just for winning/losing dynamics, but because, at this point, many countries have problems to say who the enemies and the friends are, and your hypotesis is more or less balanced, anyway it has two major problems:
First, the strength of TWO is in its hypocrisy:
Noone cares if the countries behave like allies or not: they are stronger, they have a lot more damage to spend, so they will have more bonuses even if they aren't true allies, that's all. And noone of them wants to stop this, in my opinion, especially Spain: the latest NE testifies it, because they engaged Portugal before it became a real TWO member. Unless admins definitely change bonuses, they will stay like this forever, because, like this, they win. Why should they start to lose? Or even better: what d*mned politician has balls enough to say "let's flip the sides, whocares if we lose?". If you know one, tell me! : D
Secon😛 e-world is changing.
I think that the idea "Serbia on one side, Poland on the other and everyone follows the less hated" is very "euro-centric", and I think that in some months the e-world will not be that euro-centric anymore.
Anyway I appreciate very much your thinking about new e-world solutions.
if you pardon my input, i would add that the problems you named above can be solved- but it is not in our hands, it is in Admins' hands- Admins should add more countries/ meaning more bonuses!! in my opinion, this will necessarily lead to new compositions of alliances. until then, i highly doubt, despite the fact that things are moving and there is major dissatisfaction amongst many nation (namely those that do not enjoy bonuses).
so yeah, i would remind the Admins the given promise that they will introduce more countries in game.
Admins dont need to add more countries they can put more cities of 1 country
Im sure the Admins can do a whole bunch off stuff, i just don't see them doing it anytime soon. And do not forget one of the main reasons Netherlands got wiped is its Oil resource, which person in there right mind thought it a good idea to putt a rare recourse in a country that is small and has player wise also quite limited potential. The Admins dont really care, they let a country be wiped for most of 18 months with only a few short successful agreements for a region that never lasted long.
Great ideas on changes by players there have been many, now if someone would add lets say 20.000 euro with there idea and offer it, there might actually be a change.
na e nxorre gjumin me ate foto 😛
Voted & interesting soeculations o7