the crimethink
lin0leum
dear comrade jofroi,
first of all i suppose u not only tolerate the freedom of speech but u accept it and even support it publickwide anytime and for anyone. u wouldnt deny anyone the right to freely write what they think, would u?
with the truth value of the subjected message put aside, ur argumentation in the proposal to the ebelgium court against wim vercauteren is quite FLAWED. the message was a private message between individuals. why should one care, what they do in their bedrooms? in any case it was NOT ADDRESSED TO A FOREIGN REPRESENTATIVE. it reached him a very dubious way.
i strongly believe, that your proposal is grand misunderstanding, and u've done it by an accident, in a really moved state of mind, or under the strained pressure. squealing on your fellow comrade at the bourgeois court is highly counter-productive and reactionary. i pretty much advise u to correct this failure as soon as possible and revoke this unwise action.
best regards
lin0leum, inhabitant and worker of flanders
Comments
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/when-war-goes-too-far-and-it-becomes-personal--1995607/1/20
here is the leaked message, which offended enl cp. and some of belgian citizens with their twisted approaches feel like defend the warmonger is mandatory.
Freedom if speech has it's boundaries, insulting people part of freedom of speech
There are limits to freedom of speech, but IF there is proof that a particular person has crossed those limits, there are probably better venues to address that. And indeed, one may say privately things that one cannot and should not say in public. If those private communications are shared, then there is more than person at fault legally.
there is a freedom of speech, or there is none. nothing inbetween these two states. its absolute. or it doesnot exist at all. (besides, words arent hurting, the actions r)
but this is mostly about the errors and inaccurate proposal with poor argumentation. the "thoughtpolice" attitudde of some pple is "only" disturbing and its the issue of their clear/bad conscience
Come on guys, I haven't read Jofroi's proposal, but... going to the court ? Are you serious ? 😁
Somebody acting in a wrong way canno't make you blind about basic principles.
Fhaemita, yes it has boundaries... but you're talking about "public freedom of speech" !! And as far as I know, this wasn't the case. The same words, whether they are said in public or in private, can be delictuous or not. It's completly irrelevant to argue about "the freedom of speech limits" in the case you're talking to a friend in your living room. 😁
Vote
mary> sure, the person who exposed a private message to a third person is to blame. s/he's plain untrustful
jeiry> again, if there is some restriction to the "public freedom of speech", then its not a freedom at all. u mean like freedom to speak only about particular things, which dont piss other people? for the unpleasant stuff we would have a freedom of whispering?
en français : la liberté des uns s'arrête là où commence celle des autres.
The liberty is relative, in a game, i like the respect.
It's so easy to insult, and after .... oh sorry...
I don't like that. We are here for fun, but we need limits.
The liberty of expression is nice, but not for a personal's attack.
We can't make example from bad story of real life in this game, we would hurt someone, it's not our goal.
There's no freedom of speech as those who wish for the freedom to insult others or deny history are those that are to blame for some of the major conflicts that happened in the world. As Elynea said, your freedom stops where that of another person starts.
we can speak without insults.
to mix rl with the game suck, agree. but how u could possibly hurt someone when u say ur opinion on them, elynea?
nohjis> "There's no freedom of speech" im glad u've made urself clear
Word can hurt. Spirit can be more destructive than physic.
+1 Jofroi
lin0leum : i'm special don't worry... i don't like insult but if someone says me something i don't care about it.
Tolerance 🙂
comrade jofroi> i've expected a bit more to ur defence. it's as poor as ur court proposal. word can hurt, if u let it hurt u, unless u ignore it. unlike the physical armed attack. which u can hardly outignore😁