A Call for eUS Political Detente
Ananias
About 25 days ago, I produced an article named Making a Difference: Political Parties and PTOs which addressed the importance of collaboration between eUS political organizations to combat hostile PTO attempts. During the succeeding weeks, I was elected Party President of the United States Workers Party and embarked on a plan to increase member activity, block domestic PTO attempts and provide quality choices for the American voters to choose during the last congressional elections.
Unfortunately, the last congressional elections, for the most part, followed the same basic patterns of previous elections. They also magnified the disparity between our stated goals as a nation and the practical application of electoral politics.
I have had enough. The voters have had enough. The nation has had enough. It is time for reform.
As the President of the largest political organization in the eUnited States of America, I believe it is incumbent upon the United States Workers Party to take the necessary first steps to progress toward that reform.
I am seeking a eUS political détente.
We face too many challenges as a nation for the following issues to be perpetuated by the very organizations which are established to further the interests of the fifty-one original constituencies which we are tasked to serve:
1) Vote moving. While considered “legal” by virtue of the fact that eRepublik mechanics do not support the screening of citizenship in a state, the reality remains that citizenship can be established and vote-moving policed by simply determining the number, and identities, of the citizens of most states prior to the election, wherein monitoring of regional elections can take place; but only through the collaboration of the political organizations willing, and committed, to the premise of fair elections.
2) 6th Party Disenfranchisement. While there remains frustration over the efforts of the United States Workers Party to extend the opportunity for our members to run for Congress following appropriate vetting, the reality remains that, between the top 5 parties, there is a combined total of two hundred and fifty-five available “endorsements” available for Congress each and every election cycle. Why are we not using those openings more broadly to facilitate the opportunity for members of non top-five parties?
While there are some that will belabor the “quality” of so many candidates vying for the opportunity, it is not the place for any political party to determine either who has the “right” to run for election, nor is it our role to determine who is “best” for a given constituency. That is the choice of the voters…always.
3) Hostile political takeover attempts. Consider the political strength we could provide for new nations and allies if we were to coalesce in our commitment to establish a voting block of just one or two percent of our members for the purpose of counter PTO efforts around the world. Instead the national political parties are dedicating those valuable PTO defense resources for the purpose of sniping good-faith candidates in regional races.
Honestly, we can spend the next several election cycles continuing on with business as usual, or we can commit to political détente, negotiate realistic election guidelines and consequences for non-compliance, and begin making a difference beyond our borders.
Call me an idealist, but I believe that the leaders of our national political organizations are smart enough, and focused enough on the best interests of the eUnited States if America, to make that difference through cooperation and collaboration, regardless of our ideological divide.
Therefore, I call upon the Party Presidents of all national parties to join me in charting a new course…a better course…for politics in the eUnited States of America.
We have a choice. Continue with the status quo divided, or make a difference together.
Ananias – Congressman for Florida
Party President, United States Workers Party
Proud Citizen of the eUnited States of America.
Comments
Another pertamaxx
>While there are some that will belabor the “quality” of so many candidates vying for the opportunity, it is not the place for any political party to determine either who has the “right” to run for election, nor is it our role to determine who is “best” for a given constituency. That is the choice of the voters…always.
I agree with that. I've gotten into a few arguments with Party Presidents who actively shut out their party members from running for congress. To me, it's a violation of rights.
>3) Hostile political takeover attempts
Agreed again. I watched the society page a lot today. Every time I looked, America had over 1/10 of the online citizens, and we've acquired more than 1/10 of the new citizens today. For a country as large and active as ours, we should have a large anti-TO squad to compete with Hungary's TO squad. I urge Congress to put an anti-TO squad into the budget.
If I'm reading you right, you're suggesting that we basically extend RightCon to include all parties, as in complete cooperation. I can see this leading to good things.
Publius has an anti-TO squad, it's just lacking in members and disorganized.
Thanks Em...
@Woxan-That is why I think it would serve the eUS and our allies well to put together the brain trusts of the national parties for the purpose of organization and numbers, if we can agree on a mutually acceptable plan.
Thanks for your comment!
Ananias-
I like your thinking on this. Great article!
Voted!
mjdiv
Editor of Freedom & Responsibility,
Global Currency Update, and
White House Press Secretary
voted/subscribed
Ananias: I think this is a step in the right direction. I hope all the party president join you and work together to ensure these suggestions are implemented across the board. It would tremendously aid all of us, by stopping the back and forth, and allow us to focus on further strengthening the eUSA.
Thanks Virgil, and definitely agreed Tarik.
Excellent work Ananias. We should all think about these ideas.
The only way to establish state citizens is to locate Q5 hospitals in every state. Players interested in getting the maximum xp move to NJ or Fl, some move "home" just to run for congress or vote in their "home" state. Trying to keep voters from moving and exercising their right to vote where they see fit is a gross violation of voting rights. The result of some parties and individuals using this to favor or deny certain candidates is not a sufficient reason to deny voters the ability to move "home" and vote.
YES! Of course! It's so frustrating being overseas during PTO's, trying to pull together a couple of votes knowing how much weight we COULD be throwing around. Thank you for this article.
I think anything involving where we should be voting from has the potential to become a very complicated issue. I consider myself to be an eCalifornian, but I currently live in eNew Jersey for the Q5 hospital. I only voted in the last congressional election because there was a candidate I was willing to support here in eNJ. I would love to see things done to make the voting process honest. I'm new, so I'll have to depend on the ideas of more experienced people. I'm depending on people like Ananias and others to start the process, but when they do I'm ready to do what I can to help.
(Oh, and Voted, already subscribed)
Romanians are cheating again 🙁
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/free-fights-daychange-bug-ne-harcolj-chisinauban--796100/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/free[..]/1/20
Great article! Signed and voted! Let's get this legislation rolling.
Voted (of course). On point #3, I agree 110%. When Oregon voters tire of me, I'll join the anti-PTO squad.
On point #2, many parties already endorse smaller party candidates. Each time I ran, I approached many parties to collect multiple endorsements. Of course each party will endorse a committed member who wants to run ahead of a non-member. For the USWP, the issue is trickier because so many convey 'zombie' value to your logo.
On point #1, I sympathize with the idea, but this sounds like a nightmare to monitor & impossible to enforce. And I agree with Cajun; many OR voters are in in NJ or FL (including myself) solely for the Q5 hospitals.
I see it as very inappropriate for a party president to be making demands of other political parties. Your first argument about vote moving has already been shot down by other posters, and it sure seems that you really didn't think through the issue before proclaiming that your major changes need to be implemented.
Your other points are nice ideas. But with the size and power of the USWP, why are you as the president of the USWP talking about what you believe we should be doing instead of getting your party to actually do it? You have the power right now to start the wheels of change moving.
If you want to get widespread support for change, telling others to do what you say because you said so isn't the way. Use the power and influence you have as the leader of the USWP and work for the changes you want to see. If you show that your proposals work and benefit the country as a whole, not only will everybody follow behind you and your ideas but it will be the USWP getting all the credit.
anti TO would be great!
I find this article very amusing in the sense that the USWP actively recruits people "without the knowledge of their leadership" to partcipate in TOs on election night.
Get yor party to stop doing this first before you ask others to follow suit is my suggestion. Otherwise all it is is yoiu asking others not to do it so your TOs are more successful.
I think Emerick captured the idea perfectly:
"It is like RightCon, but with everyone cooperating."
We need to have 100% unity, and I am sure the PP's can work something out.
@Mercurius 100: "I see it as very inappropriate for a party president to be making demands of other political parties."
I did not make demands of other parties, I called for detente and discussion about the issues I identified. It seems contradictory that you would allow for other parties leaders to dictate the actions of the United States Workers Party, and state that is inappropriate for me to outline what I think some of the greatest challenges we face and request discourse on solutions.
"Use the power and influence you have as the leader of the USWP and work for the changes you want to see."
As stated above, in the last elections we attempted to pursue these changes unilaterally and received vitriol rather than cooperation for the effort. That was evidence enough to me that only through collaborative effort can we overcome the issues.
I believe it should also be pointed out, that the United States Workers Party has much to offer and much to lose, but very little to gain through detente, but my personal desire is to facilitate improvements while I am in a leadership role rather than allowing recognized inequities to remain unaddressed.
@Danylo: "I find this article very amusing" I am disappointed to read that you find these issues amusing. Regardless of the source of the call for reform, if you are resistant to solutions which will result in fairer elections, I think that reveals far more about your motivations than mine.
Thanks you all for your comments, both supportive and dissenting. I have placed the call out there, and will now follow with PMs to all of the Party Presidents for a summit to discuss these issues in more detail and in hopes of reaching some consensus solutions.
"The only way to establish state citizens is to locate Q5 hospitals in every state" - Cajun Holdings
I believe this type of change in the political landscape the most expensive but also the most practical idea. The Ocean Republic organization is dedicated to raising funds for a Q5 hospital probably in New England using volunteer labor. We still have several slots for volunteers if that sounds like something you'd like to be a part of. (We would like to build in Rhode Island, but as long as war games continue there, it would actually be a very bad place to put a good hospital).
How about a Q5 hospital in Idaho?
Voted Ananias. Completed agree on your PTO position. With such a large population, the eUSA should be more than capable of countering hostile PTOs if our parties can work together. I have faith that you will help make that happen.