[PM ADDRESS] Treaty Breach Accusations by Chile

Day 1,895, 21:51 • Published in Australia Australia • by Aus Prime Minister Office




Fellow Australians,

As you are now well aware because of the Article by Infin: Chile proposes NE on Australia?, Chile has chosen to NE Australia because of Ronell being up to old tricks again which can be seen in the following log entry now in the Senate forum {Urgent!} Chile NE'D us!. As you will also be aware, the Australian Government was attempting to negotiate with the Chilean CP prior to his impeachment on a better option for Chile and Australia. This also can be seen by the public in the Senate forum Treaty discussions and negotiations with Chile .

Now we have Chile NEing us and accusing us of breaching the Treaty. Let’s look specifically at the Treaty and see who breached it shall we? The Chile – Australia Treaty is very clear in its terms.



Chile and Australia agree jointly that:

1. Australia will not sign an MPP with with Argentina;
2. Chile will release Western Australia on the 3rd January;
3. On 10th January Australia and Chile will sign an MPP which is to be maintained by successive Governments to ensure mutual assistance to each nation for defence;
4. On 20th January Chile return New South Wales to Australia.

Points 1, 2 and 3: ACHIEVED WITHOUT INCIDENT

Point 4: BREACHED BY Chile, ONLY because of the Argentinian RW of SA beforehand.



Australia agrees to:

1. allow Chile to hold on to the Australian States of Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and Tasmania until this agreement is modified by successive Australian and Chilean Administrations during the amendment period each month, or until Chile gains another region with the same resource as one of those states, at which time the Australian region will be returned to Australia;
2. Australia will move towards a Pro-CoT MPP stack or full CoT membership with increased CoT allies and MPPs;
3. Not to NE Chile.
4. deposit 200 000 AUD in Brazil as NO NE guarantee, which will be returned to Australia on 15th January, if no breach in part III. point 2.3 of this agreement will be met.

Point 1: BREACHED BY CHILE. This occurred on 2 occasions, on the 10th and on the 14th when Chile refused to return Tasmania and Victoria to us when they had Argentinian matching regions. the Australian Government overlooked this breach of the treaty in the name of friendship and the war Chile was having with Argentina.

Point 2: STARTED BUT STOPPED BECAUSE OF INDONESIA

Points 3: ACHIEVED

Point 4: DISPUTED BY CHILE AND ARBIITRATED BY BRAZIL IN OUR FAVOUR AS WE DID NOT BREACH THE TREATY CONDITIONS



Chile agrees that:

1. Australia will Ally and MPP with Brazil and USA as soon as the agreement is signed off and will probably keep those MPPs;
2. Any move by Chile to NE Australia or hand our regions to any other nation by stealth, including working or making agreements with other nations will result in this agreement being nullified.

Point 1: ACHIEVED

Point 2: NOW BREACHED BY CHILE



VI. RW IN ANY CHILEAN HELD AUSTRALIAN REGIONS NOT OFFICIALLY RELEASED

In the event that an RW is started in any Australian Region, the Australian Government will within a 24 hour period or as close as possible, order all Australian Forces to fight for Chile to ensure it remains in Chilean possession until officially released.

In EVERY case, the Australian Government has ordered the ADF to fight for Chile when Argentina has started an RW in a Chilean held region.



IV. CONDITIONS

Both nations agree that CoT, USA and Brazil will monitor and counter sign this agreement ensuring that both Chile and Australia continue to abide by the terms of this agreement. Both countries understand that it is impossible to ensure that all Citizens of their nation meet the terms and conditions of this agreement, but will ensure that their own Defence Forces Personnel are ordered to fight correctly under the terms of this agreement.

Notice the Bolded portion of this Article in the Treaty? This is what has occurred and effectively Chile is accusing us of breaching the Treaty under these conditions when it is illegal to do so.



V. BREACHES OF THIS AGREEMENT

BY Australia:

1. automatically grants Chile the right to enact war on Australia;
2. CoT, the USA and Brazil agree that they will assist Chile, should they so need it, to enact war against Australia if the conditions contained within this document are not met;

BY Chile:

1. automatically grants Australia and its Allies to enact war against Chile;
2. CoT, the USA and Brazil agrees that its own nations will enact war against Chile if conditions contained within this document are not met or broken by Chile;

This is the response should either Nation breach the Treaty.

The question is this? Now that Chile has BREACHED THE TREATY IN FULL, does Australia allow it to go unanswered or do we call on CoT, USA and Brazil to enact the Treaty breach conditions upon Chile?

Australia is open to finding a peaceful resolution as can be seen by the negotiations we had with the previous Chilean Government before it was impeached. But we will not be intimidated by a Breach of the Treaty in the current manner by Chile.


Xavier Grifith
eAustralian Prime Minister


The eAustralian National Library


Please subscribe to the Government Department Newspapers, Join the eAustralian Forums, and take a look at our National Library run by the Department of Human Services to aid our New Players.