[GregoryG] @Romper
•
by GregoryG
Hey dear friends, readers, fellow eRep players,
I've just read Rompers article, and I had some thought which I think are worth to publish rather than to be lost under the article among the numerous comments.
Some interesting thoughts from a very interesting player.
Romper is right that Creating ONE did imbalance the game - it was our main reason for creating it everyone of the founders agreed in this, we wanted to be imstopable, and well we were for like half a year, and I think that's a good achievement. We did erase pretty much every single TerreEden country after all.
On the other hand what goal the Eden reached - and it's undeniable that is was with the significant help of credit card tanks - is formidable too, it is a huge achievement it's pointless to deny it, or cry about it, this time they were better, in organisation, strategy, coordination. It is partially because their HQ is good, and partially because our lacks the true "spark".
The world, the game, the history is a cyclic thing, and this is just another proof of it.
Gregory G.
just a guy from ONE
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Let's discuss
wtf is that inci avatar 😒
voted
ZS4P!
all I can add is without Rompers "holy crusade" agains ePL, history would make a circle much much faster.
Well said
LOL, the guy that became what he was fighting with. Looks like ONE won in the end, we made Romper as bad as ONE 🙂
vote !!
Nice article, vote
oh the crusader of our times Romper Lannister think he can buy everything with his gold?
ONE'disproportionate power was needed to balance the "special powers" of former admins/mods and their Romanian tanks ("Plato's Army"). Their commitment to the EDEN side was always unfair (ban admins from fighting for the same country, the country of the developers) and did more to distort the power balance than any other factor. This is also why I don't see why any CroRo victory should be seen as some kind of great achievment. If you only consider the power deriving from the fact that some players know about the rule changes ahead of anyone else that would be quite enough to result in the conquest of an enemy power.
Vote
Karlista is right.
I said it a long time ago when asked if I will ever play for Romania: i might do it, but it will be less fun or significant then on the other side. Anti-Romania alliance was always the rebel fighting the system, pro-Romania alliance was the system itself. Every small victory of the first one is something precious, but even every epic victory for the other side always has a bad aftertaste. Just my opinion of course, other might disagree.
Yeah, but the admins turned on Romania in hopes of making their tanks pay more. They were successful, but surprisingly (to me) it was the Croatians who really went crazy with megatanking. They must be pretty full of hate/anger. Scary.
speaking of admins... try remember WSR!!!
when you are wining you are a superpower, when you are losing you are blaming the admins...don't worry, everybody is doing it 😉
Admin intervene with the game when they want I've learnt it a long ago that there is nothing any of us can do againts it...
"it was the Croatians who really went crazy with megatanking. They must be pretty full of hate/anger. Scary."
You can feel it in Rompers article. Talking about respect to each other when he had none to the enemies. Espesially ePL.
So admins are helping out Ro? I really need to recheck and update my info
thorgoth i'm bored of saying it but nobody loves or respects the traitors
Than why you respect turkey and bulgaria?
UNstopPable, my friend. Practice your english : )