Ambiente de fondo si/no

Regístrate

 

Continuar

Continuar Al crear una cuenta estás de acuerdo con las Condiciones de servicio y la Política de privacidad

[GOB CHILE] Australia and Chile Non-Aggression Agreement

Día 1,895, 20:26 por Ministerio de Defensa de Chile

Australia and Chile Non-Aggression Agreement

(ACNAA 12/12)

December, 26th 2012


Such agreement was formalized on December 26 2012, due to the good will of both parties and with the purpose of acomplishing to the letter each point made.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/acuerdo-regional-entre-chile-y-australia-chile-and-australia-regional-agreement-2186547/1/20



I. PREFACE
The following agreement shall be in force between the Australian and Chilean Governments as of its signing and shall be ratified before the 10th of each month with each new successive elected Government.

We are facing a new scenario, due to the latest internal politics events of our country, where regrettably the CP “SansCoeur” (perfil: http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5602834 ) has been destituted by the congress of eChile (link of such law:

http://www.erepublik.com/es/main/law/Chile/122675 ).

It's because of the understanding of this, it's noteworthy that, our new government represented by Khioz (profile: http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5334137 ) takes charge of eChile starting on day 1,893 of the new world (january 25 2013 RL).



III. REGIONAL HOLDINGS
All signatory Governments agree to the following:

2. Australia agrees to:

1. Allow Chile to hold on to the Australian States of Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and Tasmania until this agreement is modified by successive Australian and Chilean Administrations during the amendment period each month, or until Chile gains another region with the same resource as one of those states, at which time the Australian region will be returned to Australia;

The agreement in question, has not been modified by the parties to the present day.
And Australia has failed with point III 1), because the territory of Tasmania (resource: cattle) it's under their domain since January 17 2013, so the foregoing is not met, as eChile does not have duplicity of resource (cattle).

Facts RW Tasmania:

Started January 16 2013 09:14:03
Ended January 17 2013 12:00:04


2. Australia will move towards a Pro-CoT MPP stack or full CoT membership with increased CoT allies and MPPs;

Australia has not signed any MPP with MEMBER countries of our alliance CoT for more than two months. (It should be noted that they just renewed the MPP with eChile 15 days ago)


VI. RW in Any Chilean held Australian Regions not officially released

In the event that an RW is started in any Australian Region, the Australian Government will within a 24 hour period or as close as possible, order all Australian Forces to fight for Chile to ensure it remains in Chilean possession until officially released.


Day after day we see how Australian citizens break code VI and fight against this treaty of no agression and against eChile.

Countless times our MOFA has made this evident to our CP and to the representative of the Australian government, but this situation sadly seems to go nowhere.

Some SS of Australians, breaking this point in question.

Member of the Australian Senate.


http://prntscr.com/qkm8h
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/2090058
http://prntscr.com/qj3yn
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/4799898
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/6004238
http://prntscr.com/qe3gz

http://grab.by/j56i
http://prntscr.com/ph56j
http://prntscr.com/ph58w
http://prntscr.com/ph5d8

Australian profiles

http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/2119267
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/2245901
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/1562524
http://prntscr.com/ph5ls

Australian profiles

http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/3491614
http://prntscr.com/ph5od

Australian profiles

http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/1813705
http://prntscr.com/ph64l
https://www.dropbox.com/s/20il035sfvonojw/SS_tasmania%20AUS.rar
http://prntscr.com/qdyad

Australian profiles

http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/1653365
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5510598
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/2374785
http://prntscr.com/qe2xv

Australian profiles

http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/1273705
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5008601
http://prntscr.com/qe33u

Australian profiles

http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/4855280
http://prntscr.com/qe3gz

Australian profiles

http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5281456
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/6046180
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/2544434
http://prntscr.com/qe3wa

Australian profiles

http://prntscr.com/qgcev
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/1889960
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/1653365

Australian profiles

http://vvcap.net/db/pUJMVgajdHfqV2RerTj8.htp
and many more ss
and many more ss
and many more ss
and many more ss
and many more ss
and many more ss
and many more ss
and many more ss


VII. FAILURE TO RENEW THIS AGREEMENT

1. Failure of both nations to renew this agreement each month as per I. and II:

a. should this agreement fail to be renewed each month as per the above Sections, then all parties are free to act at will.

Understanding all of these facts and arguments, we find ourselves under the tentative position of NOT RENEWING THE ACCORD, due to the bad disposition and failure to comply from the Australian people towards us.


Yours truly.

Khioz CP of eChile
Gael Cavannari MOD eChile



VERSION ESPAÑOL


Acuerdo de no agresión entre Australia y Chile.

(ACNAA 12/12)

Diciembre, 26 dic 2012


Aquel acuerdo fue suscrito el día 26 de Diciembre de 2012, debido a la buena voluntad de las partes y con el propósito de cumplir a cabalidad todos los puntos expuesto.

http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/acuerdo-regional-entre-chile-y-australia-chile-and-australia-regional-agreement-2186547/1/20


I. PREFACIO.


El siguiente acuerdo entrará en funcionamiento entre los Gobiernos de Australia y Chile a partir de su firma y será ratificado antes del día 10 de cada mes con cada nuevo Gobierno elegido sucesivamente.
Nos encontramos frente a un nuevo escenario, debido a los últimos acontecimientos de la política interna de nuestro país, donde lamentablemente el presidente “SansCoeur” (perfil: http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5602834 ) ha sido destituido por el congreso de nuestro país (link de la ley en cuestión: http://www.erepublik.com/es/main/law/Chile/122675 ). Es por ello que entendiendo esto, cabe mencionar que, nuestro nuevo gobierno representado por Khioz (perfil: http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5334137 ) se hace cargo de eChile a contar desde día 1,893 del Nuevo mundo (25 de enero 2013 RL).

III. ACCIONES REGIONALES.

Los gobiernos de Australia y Chile se compromete a lo siguiente:

2. Australia se compromete a:

1) Permitir a Chile quedarse con las regiones australianas de Queensland, South Australia, Victoria y Tasmania hasta que este acuerdo sea modificado por las sucesivas administraciones de Australia y Chile durante el período de enmienda mensual, o hasta que Chile gane otra región con el mismo recurso de las regiones antes mencionadas y acuerde con Australia devolver dicha región (ya que existiría duplicidad del recurso).

El acuerdo en cuestión, no ha sido modificado por las partes hasta el dia de hoy.

Y Australia ha incumplido en el punto III 1), debido a que la zona de Tasmania (recurso: ganado) se encuentra bajo su dominio desde el dia 17 de Enero del 2013, y no se cumple con lo expuesto anteriormente, ya que Chile no presenta duplicidad de recurso (ganado).

Datos RW Tasmania:

Comenzada 16 Enero 2013 09:14:03

Termino 17 Enero 2013 12:00:04

2) Tener MPP con países Pro-CoT y CoT, y eventualmente llegar a ser parte de CoT.

Australia no ha firmado MPP alguno, con países MIEMBROS de nuestra alianza CoT hace mas de dos meses. (cabe señalar que sólo renovaron el MPP con Chile hace 15 días)

VI. RW LEVANTADAS EN TERRITORIO CHILENO (regiones originales de Australia) SIN PREVIO ACUERDO.

En caso de que una RW sea levantada en cualquiera de los territorios controlados por Chile, el Gobierno australiano, en un plazo inferior a 24 horas, ordenará a todas sus fuerzas militares pelear por el lado chileno para asegurar que Chile mantenga la posesión de la región.

Día tras día vemos como ciudadanos Australianos no obedecen el punto VI y pelean en contra de este acuerdo de no agresión y en contra de Chile.

Innumerables veces nuestro MOFA ha hecho ver esto al CP y representante del congreso Australiano, pero aquella situación lamentablemente no parece cambiar.

Algunas SS de Australianos, irrumpiendo este punto en cuestión.

Miembro del congreso Australiano

http://prntscr.com/qkm8h
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/2090058
http://prntscr.com/qj3yn
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/4799898
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/6004238
http://prntscr.com/qe3gz

http://grab.by/j56i
http://prntscr.com/ph56j
http://prntscr.com/ph58w
http://prntscr.com/ph5d8

Perfiles de los Australiano:

http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/2119267
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/2245901
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/1562524
http://prntscr.com/ph5ls

Perfiles de los Australiano:

http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/3491614
http://prntscr.com/ph5od

Perfiles de los Australiano:

http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/1813705
http://prntscr.com/ph64l
https://www.dropbox.com/s/20il035sfvonojw/SS_tasmania%20AUS.rar
http://prntscr.com/qdyad

Perfiles de los Australiano:

http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/1653365
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5510598
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/2374785
http://prntscr.com/qe2xv

Perfiles de los Australiano:

http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/1273705
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5008601
http://prntscr.com/qe33u

Perfiles de los Australiano:

http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/4855280
http://prntscr.com/qe3gz

Perfiles de los Australiano:

http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5281456
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/6046180
http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/2544434
http://prntscr.com/qe3wa

Perfiles de los Australianos

http://prntscr.com/qgcev
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/1889960
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/1653365

Perfiles de los Australianos

http://vvcap.net/db/pUJMVgajdHfqV2RerTj8.htp



VII. NO RENOVACIÓN DEL ACUERDO.

1. Falta de ambos países en renovar este acuerdo según secciones I. y II:

Si este acuerdo no es renovado cada mes según las secciones anteriores, entonces todas las partes quedan libres para actuar a su voluntad.

Entendiendo todos estos hechos y argumentos, nos vemos en la tentativa de NO RENOVAR EL ACUERDO, debido a la mala disposición e incumplimiento que ha presentado el pueblo Australiano, para con nosotros.



Saluda Atte.

Khioz CP de eChile
Gael Cavannari MOD eChile
 

Comentarios

ANTINIANKU
ANTINIANKU Día 1,895, 20:27

pole

Gael Cavannari
Gael Cavannari Día 1,895, 20:28

o7

Maximiliano Ortega Iturrieta A
Maximiliano Ortega Iturrieta A Día 1,895, 20:28

cierro podio

darth sidious2.0
darth sidious2.0 Día 1,895, 20:30

o7

Zer0Xx
Zer0Xx Día 1,895, 20:31

Pole

Ya era hora o7

Beatrix Kiddo I
Beatrix Kiddo I Día 1,895, 20:32

o7

Guacolda Melian
Guacolda Melian Día 1,895, 20:33

o7

yendegaia
yendegaia Día 1,895, 20:34

o7

reylik miragefinger
reylik miragefinger Día 1,895, 20:34

Siempre se supo, que australia no respeta ningun acuerdo.

Edreams Chile
Edreams Chile Día 1,895, 20:35

ppffff

Gael Cavannari
Gael Cavannari Día 1,895, 20:38

@lancer450 I invite you to reread the article, apparently did not read
regards

ielermanda
ielermanda Día 1,895, 20:41

Que manera de hinchar las pelotas estos canguros. A darles con todo nomás.

DIETRICH8
DIETRICH8 Día 1,895, 20:53

que el tío sam y australia se vayan a la mierda

Tenshou
Tenshou Día 1,895, 20:55

Hahaha Shile, Shile, Shile, you are so funny, you hates Aus and you did that pact...

You show your real face now.

Plata1
Plata1 Día 1,895, 20:56

\o/

Gael Cavannari
Gael Cavannari Día 1,895, 21:03

@lancer450 Chile has never broken the treaty. Otherwise You Should Have made ​​an anouncement to the Countries That Were Guaranteeing the treaty

And the photos that are in this article are not even half of all that we have, It would be illogical to add all of it

Daenerys Stormborn Targaryen
Daenerys Stormborn Targaryen Día 1,895, 21:03

Chile failed to defeat Argentina in the RW's.... take this to CoT and lets have an official ruling on who is responsible for what.

oh wait, you have gone and done an unapproved NE against Aus regardless.

Facts are facts and truths are truths. Chile leaders are being dodgy again.

scottty the NUKE Día 1,895, 21:04

Comentario borrado

lancer450
lancer450 Día 1,895, 21:04

Ok. Let me understand your reasoning. You are going to NE eAustralia and make it easy for eArgentina to wipe you by causing eChile to lose MPPs with allies.

BTW check out this: http://battle-watcher.com/campaigns/campaign/37973 and http://battle-watcher.com/campaigns/campaign/37807

lol'd You are trying to find excuses.

Daenerys Stormborn Targaryen
Daenerys Stormborn Targaryen Día 1,895, 21:05

oh.... yeah I forgot to add Scottty and company send their love.

Charles_Charmichael
Charles_Charmichael Día 1,895, 21:07

Haha why you guys never think eIndonesia position?... they don't have enought region...

lancer450
lancer450 Día 1,895, 21:07

@Gael You showed a few players fighting some of whom are very new to the game. This doesn't in any way prove that the eAustralian government and the eAustralian people tried to take back regions that are not included in the treaty. This is nothing but drama manufactured after those logs were released imo.

eChile is losing their eAussie regions because of eArgentina NOT because of eAustralia. Even when all of eAustralia tries to help you fight against the eArgentines, you guys still lost. Where are CoT allies? Why aren't they helping? eAustralians and eChileans can only do so much alone. The blame rests with eArgentina.

Sir_c0nstant
Sir_c0nstant Día 1,895, 21:08

http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/so-who-blinked-first-echile-or-eaustralia-2202141/1/20
so who broke the treaty first, you have shown battles after you broke the treaty. Two can play that game.

Mickskitz
Mickskitz Día 1,895, 21:08

@Gael, look at the overall battle stats and see how many of the top 5 were Aussies? Also 2 days before this war when you were due to return NSW to us, look at the damage you did against Aus to stop them winning the region. Can't have it both ways guys. If you look overall at the stats of how much dmg aus has done in battles against you vs how much Arg has, you will see that almost no aussies in the top 10

Majester
Majester Día 1,895, 21:09

IV. CONDITIONS
Both nations agree that CoT, USA and Brazil will monitor and counter sign this agreement ensuring that both Chile and Australia continue to abide by the terms of this agreement. Both countries understand that it is impossible to ensure that all Citizens of their nation meet the terms and conditions of this agreement, but will ensure that their own Defence Forces Personnel are ordered to fight correctly under the terms of this agreement.

Tenshou
Tenshou Día 1,895, 21:10

Nothing new, Shile is a traitor country. They are the best with the lies.

Shile, be a man and tell the things face to face, loud and clear, without stupids lies.

lancer450
lancer450 Día 1,895, 21:10

"Both countries understand that it is impossible to ensure that all Citizens of their nation meet the terms and conditions of this agreement, but will ensure that their own Defence Forces Personnel are ordered to fight correctly under the terms of this agreement."

THIS! The eChilean government did NOT read the treaty correctly and are making up excuses to NE eAustralia!

Majester
Majester Día 1,895, 21:11

Your screenshots have exactly 1 Australian Defence Force Personnel, and he belongs to a private MU affiliated to the Australian Defence Force.

OgnH
OgnH Día 1,895, 21:17

o7

Lev Hesse
Lev Hesse Día 1,895, 21:27

o7

Kravenn
Kravenn Día 1,895, 21:37

What happened is a bit sad, it began well with an historical agreement between Chile and Australia.
I was really thinking to see a beginning of a friendship between these 2 countries.

Sadly, we saw that several Aus congress member made some sabotage on RW and no progress were made on Aus side to move to a proCoT stance (It was never asked to have full CoT MPPs but I'm sure that having Chile - BG and MKD should have been seen as progress).

It is not needed to blame Chile there. It was known that Chile vs Argentina war should continue and in that case, to keep the signed agreement alive : Australia should fight for Chile on these RW. We already had the same situation on UK when there was a treaty between Ireland and us.
When they had problems, they contacted us and we moved to the other side. Here, it was enough to fight for Chile on these RW. I know that it can be hard but think about long term goals instead of short ones.

I totally understand Chilean position there, They can't deserve to be blamed there, at least they tried to have something correct there (keep some resources and give back some regions to Australia)

Killua Lion
Killua Lion Día 1,895, 21:39

o7

Benzo Diazepino
Benzo Diazepino Día 1,895, 21:46

No sé si estuvieron presentes cuando Argentina estaba dando repartos para liberar esa región. Me parece que sólo se está usando la imagen de algunos australianos para justificar el ataque ...

A mi juicio, un muy mal movimiento.

Rosanganth
Rosanganth Día 1,895, 22:01

eChile shows its true face!

lancer450
lancer450 Día 1,895, 22:04

I would suggest reading this: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/2202159/1/20

Xavier Griffith
Xavier Griffith Día 1,895, 22:52

And you might want to check these breaches of the Treaty by Chile in the RW of NSW for 4 Battles:
http://tinyurl.com/agf36be

So how often do you want to go back and forth? The NE by Chile is a full breach of the Treaty, it was done by a member of the Chilean Cabinet, not a Rogue Congressman.

Gael Cavannari
Gael Cavannari Día 1,895, 22:56

I. PREFACE
The following agreement shall be in force between the Australian and Chilean Governments as of its signing and shall be ratified before the 10th of each month with each new successive elected Government.

II. AMENDMENT CONDITIONS
Amendments to the agreement may only be made once each month prior to renewal and ratification by each Government after in-game Country President Elections.


We are facing a new scenario, due to the latest internal politics events of our country, where regrettably the CP “SansCoeur” (perfil: http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5602834 ) has been destituted by the congress of eChile (link of such law: http://www.erepublik.com/es/main/law/Chile/122675 ).

It's because of the understanding of this, it's noteworthy that, our new government represented by Khioz (profile: http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5334137 ) takes charge of eChile starting on day 1,893 of the new world (january 25 2013 RL).

VII. FAILURE TO RENEW THIS AGREEMENT
1. Failure of both nations to renew this agreement each month as per I. and II:
a. should this agreement fail to be renewed each month as per the above Sections, then all parties are free to act at will.

Understanding all of these facts and arguments, we find ourselves under the tentative position of NOT RENEWING THE ACCORD, due to the bad disposition and failure to comply from the Australian people towards us.

Xavier Griffith
Xavier Griffith Día 1,896, 23:07

The Treaty was ratified under the Elected CP of Chile for the Month of January, impeachment of the original Chilean CP that ratified the Treaty does not nulify the Treaty until the new CP elections occur. Chile is now officially in breach of the Treaty.

Gael Cavannari
Gael Cavannari Día 1,896, 23:19

be ratified with each new successive elected Government.

"It's because of the understanding of this, it's noteworthy that, our new government represented by Khioz (profile: http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5334137 ) takes charge of eChile starting on day 1,893 of the new world (january 25 2013 RL)".

maurogfch
maurogfch Día 1,896, 23:33

jjajajajajajajaj las rw las perdieron por que los Argentinos pegamos ahi y se las ganamos nosotros jajajajaja
van a traicionar a Australia ahora??? ese Australia que los salvo de estar viviendo bajo el agua???
son los mejores!!!!!!!

lancer450
lancer450 Día 1,896, 23:34

^ That is NOT an elected government. The new CP was NOT elected by the people of eChile. He was put in that position as a result of an impeachment. They are NOT the same thing.

Gael Cavannari
Gael Cavannari Día 1,896, 23:40

Congressmen, are people of Chile @lancer450 (in fact to be a congressman must have citizenship of the country.)
And impeach if they are a way to choose new governments, or if you think that does not change from one president to another.

Edreams Chile
Edreams Chile Día 1,896, 23:45

No creo que sea la mejor forma Gael como ya te lo dije.....hay que mantener buenas relaciones, y siempre buscar una salida negociada....no es la forma....

o/

elinternacional
elinternacional Día 1,896, 23:45

jajajaja por unos cuantos que pegaron arman toda esta mentira para romper el acuerdo? los argentinos pegamos y armamos esas RW y ustedes le echan la culpa a los australianos? me mato de la risa en solo pensar cuanto tiempo pasaron planeando como romper el acuerdo lavandose las manos con mentiras para con los australianos jajajajajajajaja eCHILENOS SON UNA MENTIRA... SOLO TRATAN DE JUSTIFICAR LO INJUSTIFICABLE.

elinternacional
elinternacional Día 1,896, 23:47

No sé si estuvieron presentes cuando Argentina estaba dando repartos para liberar esa región. Me parece que sólo se está usando la imagen de algunos australianos para justificar el ataque ...

A mi juicio, un muy mal movimiento.

Benzo Diazepino +1

Xavier Griffith
Xavier Griffith Día 1,896, 23:55

This attack and betrayal by Chile's Government will not help either nation. While you attack Australia, Argentina will wipe you out. Australia will not assist Chile in defeating Argentina. Chile does no favours breaking the Treaty like this, the Treaty is clear:

I. PREFACE
The following agreement shall be in force between the Australian and Chilean Governments as of its signing and shall be ratified before the 10th of each month with each new successive elected Government.

This was done and this new Chilean Government is in full breach of the Treaty. What makes it worse is that the NE was done by a member of the new Chilean Cabinet, not a "rogue" congressman which could be excused.

Edreams Chile
Edreams Chile Día 1,896, 23:56

Benzo Diazepino +1111

Xavier Griffith
Xavier Griffith Día 1,896, 23:56

And instead of seeking arbitration by CoT, Brazil and USA like you should have, you simply acted on your own.

Gael Cavannari
Gael Cavannari Día 1,896, 00:02

@Xavier Grifffith This new government has decided not to renew the NAP, which is what I do not understand ?
And we respect all the regular channels, informing COT and the guarantor countries of the Chilean government decision.

Gael Cavannari
Gael Cavannari Día 1,896, 00:08

Muchas veces el gobierno no toma decisiones para que sean populares y/o del agrado de la mayoría. Sino que debe tomar decisiones difíciles, siempre pensando en hacer valer los derechos de Chile.

 
Publicar tu comentario

¿Qué es esto?

Estás leyendo un artículo escrito por un ciudadano de eRepublik, un juego de estrategia multijugador inmersivo basado en países reales. Crea tu propio personaje y ayuda a tu país a alcanzar todo su esplendor mientras tú te consolidas como un héroe de guerra, un reconocido editor o un gurú de las finanzas.