Join the new world

Happy Independence day!

Happy Independence Day everyone!!! The only thing is the eUSA is
wiped out... Lol

Votado

Check out all of the Serbian citizenships that the "honorable" Zeng999 approved on May 15th (must have been an election day): http://www.erepublik.com/en/country/USA/citizenship/applications/approved/1443

These people will stop at nothing to bring down our democracy with their lies and misdirection. Sorry but that is not the direction I am looking to go toward, especially on July 4th.

Fara e flliqt.
Po kurre skeni me fitu,me dite qe ment ju dalin prej kreje.

Hajt hin tash ne translate kqyre qka kom shkru.
.
.
Nuk ta perkthen hiq o mut

From your last article: " I personally feel that the Confederate cause was a just one........ unfortunately the wrong side prevailed".

You self describe as a racist who believes in the institution of slavery, treating people as property and white supremacy. You have repeatedly stated that the service member who dies, leaving a widow and orphans, perishes without honour. You would be welcome at Westboro Baptist.

For these reasons, in addition to your history of being banned by admins and your demonstrated cheerleading for the invading teams, this article is offensive to me. I don't speak for others. You are, however, perfectly entitled to offend me.

Don't put words in my mouth, and stop distorting my views. The Confederacy stood for liberty and the values of the founding of the nation, and I feel that serving in a military which permits dishonorable behavior is not something I would do as long as this sort of unAmerican policy is in place.

You have repeatedly stated that the service member who dies, leaving a widow and orphans, perishes without honour. You. Specifically. If you wish to amend that view and apologize to the service members that you specifically said that to, well that is progress.

As to your views of the outcome of the civil war and what the Confederacy stood for I am, unfortunately, unable to credit you with being stupid. Since I believe you have an average intellect I conclude you are perfectly aware that the Confederate states maintained and promoted both the institution of slavery and white supremacy. About these things there is no dispute except with the deliberately ignorant.

This goes to my main point of course. Deliberate ignorance is unhealthy for our community and offensive to me. Again, I don't pretend to speak for others but urge voters and leaders to distance themselves from you and to permit you no influence and no access to any political position. In this, I think there is wide agreement amongst players from both team eUSA and team eSerbia.

More like above average....

and stop making stuff up.

I will put it simply for you.

Anyone who violates UCMJ Article 125 should be dishonorably court-martialed and prosecuted to the fullest extent of military law.

and you can regurgitate propaganda all you want, as I said, the victors write the history books. It doesn't make it true, and your understanding of the CW is misguided at best.

The Confederacy stood for, if I don't get my way, I am leaving and taking my toys home with me.

When the Constituion was being viewed as applying to "all men" some states got upset and decided the US Constitution wasn't for them and wrote their own.

As for dishonorable behavior, USMJ is updated and revised all the time. I don't know if that is actually still on the books or not. But honestly, I don't give a shit of minor issues. UCMJ Article 125 would not typically end up as a dishonorable discharge, more than likely just a other than honorable discharge if someone bothered to actually press it.

As a former service member, RGR, how about signing up and working on changing it from the inside. Or better yet, serve a term, get some experience and use it to make the political changes you feel are needed. Unless they broke Geneva Convention or committed an actually recognized US Federal Crime, then the service member is honorable. But then again, I actually chose to serve.

I don't make stuff up Ajay. Your specific words, including about all military members serving without honour, have been published, repeatedly and you have maintained a consistent position until now. If you have now reconsidered and believe that service in the armed forces is an honourable calling, that is progress. You should of course apologize for having offered the previous insults, but I leave that to you. It would demonstrate a degree of integrity.

The victors do indeed tend to write the history. In the case of the Civil War, the losers also wrote a lot of history and of course they wrote all those contemporary documents. No one except the deliberately uninformed can suggest that the institution of slavery did not exist, that it was not cherished and defended in the Confederacy, that the contemporary speeches and documents didn't champion those institutions and promote their retention and extension. Not even the apologists go anywhere near that far. You self describe as being of above average intelligence. I therefore conclude you are deliberately dishonest. Perhaps only with yourself - granted. This is a matter of civic importance for all real life Americans. I therefore councel an honest investigation of the credible scholarship in this field. I'm sorry for the harsh words but if they give you pause to reflect and re-appraise they will not have been in vain. Regards.

Not really. I have always said that, so you are misinterpreting my words..

Slavery existed in the union too.

General Lee was an abolitionist and owned no slaves, and most southern soldiers owned no slaves, just as some Union soldiers did own slaves. This only became an issue to damage the agrarian southern economy later in the war.... not as some sort of grand crusade. Slavery was on its way out anyway. It was no where near the main cause of the war. The south fought for independence. The north fought to preserve the union by any means necessary.

if you have changed your mind that is good. But no one is misinterpreting. Everyone can read it : http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/spelling-is-not-always-important-2143550/1/20

Don't know if you will delete your own comment to that article or the various comments you have made repeating the same thing over the last two hundred days. So, no, you are not being misinterpreted. If you have changed your view congrats.

If you don't wish to read any credible history, all of which is consistent on the point of slavery and white supremacy, that is your choice. You do not demonstrate above average intelligence by spouting nonsense. I would suggest, as a first approach, looking at the primary sources including the contemporary speeches by Southern Leaders and, of course the various formal declarations of secession written, published, circulated and promoted by the "losers" before they were defeated. I suggest this in part because it may help you to avoid appearing to be a racist white supremacist apologist bigot. Regards.

" Slavery was on its way out anyway. It was no where near the main cause of the war. "

So if we remove slavery from the equation (ie: slavery does not exist in the USA in 1860), does the Civil War happen?

It does not. So your comment is not based in fact, but in a revisionist view of the civil war.

Mississippi's succession: "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin."

Other states--

Texas: "We hold as undeniable truths that the governments of the various States, and of the confederacy itself, were established exclusively by the white race, for themselves and their posterity; that the African race had no agency in their establishment; that they were rightfully held and regarded as an inferior and dependent race, and in that condition only could their existence in this country be rendered beneficial or tolerable.

That in this free government *all white men are and of right ought to be entitled to equal civil and political rights* [emphasis in the original]; that the servitude of the African race, as existing in these States, is mutually beneficial to both bond and free, and is abundantly authorized and justified by the experience of mankind, and the revealed will of the Almighty Creator, as recognized by all Christian nations; while the destruction of the existing relations between the two races, as advocated by our sectional enemies, would bring inevitable calamities upon both and desolation upon the fifteen slave-holding states."

Georgia: "The people of Georgia having dissolved their political connection with the Government of the United States of America, present to their confederates and the world the causes which have led to the separation. For the last ten years we have had numerous and serious causes of complaint against our non-slave-holding confederate States with reference to the subject of African slavery. They have endeavored to weaken our security, to disturb our domestic peace and tranquility, and persistently refused to comply with their express constitutional obligations to us in reference to that property, and by the use of their power in the Federal Government have striven to deprive us of an equal enjoyment of the common Territories of the Republic"

olivermellors... I'll consider your comments here as speaking for me-- I simply don't have the patience for arguing with this punk.

General Lee was not an abolitionist. When he inherited his property from his father in law, he was directed to free the slaves. He in turn did not, as he needed their labor to improve upon the property with its current condition and debts. Also, due to the fact that he was rarely home because of military obligations, he left others in charge of the slaves and though was not very involved in their "handling" still owned them.

Happy Independence day!

Profile check; Thank for using a bomb against the eUSA for Poland, Fidel! You are what the AFA is all about!

I'm sorry because of bombs ... I dropped them accidentally

Happy Independence day!

Vos aparecés hasta en los artículos yankis, dejate de pasear por NY, tenes poles que hacer!

I really need the unvote button.

Voted time for a change in america

Do you know that you are fighting for the eUSA against many of your AFA brothers on the battlefield, only to support them in the ballot box? Go ahead and click on some profiles in your party to see what AFA is really all about. Check out Zeng's track record at the top of these comments.

and what has the nFeds or USWP done as well as current CP ran the eUS into the ground

So you're willing to vote for people from the AFA who actively fight against the US on the battlefield rather than support the Feds, USWP, AMP, WTP, or 6th party that do their best to help the US on every front?

and this is why while NH fell and the eUS wasd wiped out yesterday all other political parties where fighting DoD orders in Finland

Being in an alliance means that we have to help our allies just as much as they help us. If we never help our allies, why should we expect them to help us?

Unity brought us wipe
Zeng will bring us prosperity
SAY NO TO UNITY PUPPET CANDIDATE
VOTE ZENG FOR POTUS

Profile check: Thanks for fighting for the eUSA. I guess as RGR's biggest cheerleader, you need to keep up appearances. Way to use a bomb against our friends in Brazil though, and trolling 80% of us mercilessly. That never gets old.

Give me a R
Give me a G
Give me a R

RONALD
RONALD
RONALD

As for BraZil, I have 2 more bombs ready for them!

And remember on Day 2046 the eUSA was fighting an invasion. And Viarizi used big damage not only not *for* the eUSA, but against an ally.

True patriot indeed.
Duty
Honor
Loyalty
Just not to the eUSA

Thanks Wiliem I do try my best! o7

Love how they nit pick about your damage. My Gosh, you used it against Brazilians! And Pfeiffer insulted those same allies (and since he was a Unity candidate, I'll bet $20 they voted for him), but now they're all anti-Pfeifferists... now that he has abandoned them.

Yeah, that must be it: "nit-picking". Because when you *claim* to be for the eUSA, but your *actions* indicate otherwise, its just a minor point.

voted

Profile check: Meh, I like the Ukraine and I would like to have you back on our side. Yet, you are a member of the eUSA now and did use a bomb against out CoT ally Russia. Can't say I approve of that. There is still time to renounce your membership in the un-American AFA for something better.

Happy Independence day, let's go and KILL ALL THEM

Whoah, let's not get carried away. We're just talking about voting here. Some nice damage for eUSA, but I sense a hostility towards us that must originate from your TWO-homeland of Argentina. Did Zeng999, the teller of untruths, invite you here or one of AFA's corrupt congressmen?

Go ... yourself, nobody care.

Happy Independence day
V+S

o7

You are just subscribing to RGR's paper now? For shame! Oh well, I haven't yet either.

votado

v28

Happy independence day to all RL 'Muricans.

I need some food and weapons ;🙂

"He would see this country burn if he could be King of the ashes."

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY USA 😁)))))))))