eWorld Trade Centar

25

Qumni Day 450, 19:32

nice

25

WahooBob Day 450, 19:35

copied from the wiki as usual.

poor english skills.

not voted, not sub'd.

23

Kogarashi Hazuki Day 450, 19:36

Bravo

47

dSoKre Day 450, 19:37

what is copied??

only productivity formula

if you don't like it, don't subscribe & vote

25

Qumni Day 450, 19:37

he added a lot more than the wiki says.

23

0asishead Day 450, 19:44

V.O.T.E.D™

26

Desertfalcon Day 450, 19:54

Yay for more useless information and broken english.

26

Desertfalcon Day 450, 19:55

What I don't see is why so many people vote this stuff up and subscribe when it only pertains to a few people. Oh well

27

Chicco Day 450, 19:55

Good lucking finding workers for your 10 Q2 companies.

This article is such nonsense.

31

Gnom Day 450, 19:58

and where is the problem if it's copied from wiki? There is a lot of new players or old who can be informed in forma like this! Just go on my friend - at the moment you are the best journalist at the eR world. Best regards. (This guy is obviously gelous on you - it's just one of the human characteristics). But listen WahooBob we are form Balcans - if you will come in our house we will give you the best what we have. If we have two bottles of wine you will get the better one. So wright your article and show us how you will do it... see ya

47

dSoKre Day 450, 20:10

@ chico - 10 companies in 10 countries is it nonsense??
No need for export licence

@ gnom - )) hvala

26

Greystrand Day 450, 21:51

wow, I don't understand why you guys are dissing this, it's not hurting you; the only thing I can think is that you're jealous of the newspaper's success.

If you're not interested in efficiency or the economic side of the game, you're right, this information does not pertain to you, but if you are interested, his information is always well organized and the format of the newspaper makes it easy to navigate.

As for the quality of the English, it may not be as refined as a native speaker, but it's good enough to be understood and kudos to dSoKre for trying, I'd like to see you try to speak his language.

Or

ZorCorp Day 450, 22:05

Seriously... this is some good stuff. I mean, I could use the information from the wiki and figure this stuff out, but I don't. That's what's so great about it... he took the time to figure it out.

24

xen32 Day 450, 22:06

@WahooBob, dude, MOST of the players AREN'T native english speakers. You must be glad that he's at least trying to write in english, not it *insert some strange language here*

21

Maposaurus Day 450, 22:11

Nice again dSoKre!

Gotta love your articles ^^

30

Vincent Garibaldi Day 450, 22:27

Actually, just like in real life, the optimum amount of capital investment will vary based on wages.

30

Kape Day 450, 23:36

First of all you should use the lowest price per unit to compare Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4 and Q5. Now you are using a price of 1 USD for Q1 and 2.3 USD for Q3 for example, that kind of messes up the calculations.

To claim that Q2 is the "best Q" is of course false, it all depends on market prices, salaries and how long you are able wait before your initial investment is paid for. As the skills within raw materials get higher on average there will also be a lot easier to find skilled workers with high Q houses that can produce Q4/Q5 without major drop in wellness.

Anyway, voted for your efforts to "teach" people game mechanics but you should run through your numbers once more and consider a different conclusion.

25

dani36 Day 450, 23:47

Very good work
Subscribed

47

dSoKre Day 451, 01:04

@ Kape - I took the prices od wood from market

I think Q2 is the best becouse you'll have 80% more wood for only 20 gold

50

Alex Craciun Day 451, 01:05

First of all you're making a mistake.
One Q2 company produces 0.6 from the production of a Q5 company, so the proportion would be 10 Q2 companies produce the same as 6 Q5.
So... 400 gold compared to 1900 gold.

The problem is elsewhere... workforce, hiring only 60 guys instead of 100 lowers your production costs, the competition amongst the workers is bigger, the salaries get lower.

47

dSoKre Day 451, 01:13

@ Alex Craciun - that is only metaphor

10 Q2 = 400 gold = 1336 Q2 wood every day = 2672 Q1 Wood

2 Q5 = 780 gold = 178,2 Q5 wood every day = 891 Q1 Wood

What is better?????

23

EKO dong Day 451, 03:16

Q3 is the best option i think not q2

24

zhorgul Day 451, 04:12

I agree with the article.

Also for your employees counter idea. Think what it would take for an employee to stay in a Q5 raw company ... just insane

23

Tim09 Day 451, 04:25

You forget the fact that you also have to pay extra wages in lower q companies cause you need to employ more people to make the same amount.

24

Uncle Sam Day 451, 07:05

please stop clogging the USA media

24

Maziyar Mirshahi Day 451, 07:07

V
O
T
E
D

23

adalephat Day 451, 07:57

SEGÍTSÉGET PAKISZTÁNNAK/HELP FOR PAKISTAN:http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/pakiszt-n-bajban-pakistan-in-problem-734626/1/20

Or

FinGlobal Day 451, 08:24

Nice article!

Voted,
Already subscribed

38

Scadens Day 451, 09:44

I have to agree with Kape here. You can't draw conclusions like this when your wood prices are off. If a Q1 company can have stock sold at a 1 USD price, then a Q5 company is stupid to sell at a 3.7USD price.
In your example, the Q4 company dictates the price level. If there were only Q4 companies on the market, there's no way you could compete with a Q2 company. The price at which resources are sold would not be profitable to a Q2, but a Q4 would do profit.

The Q4 company still turns in the best profit, and that's more important in the long run than simply measuring RoI. Also, note that Q3 makes ~50 USD more profit a day, so the upgrade cost is a non-issue. However, I agree with you that a Q5 resources company brings in a lot less profit than it should be, taking the upgrade cost into consideration.

21

Dado Shimke Day 451, 10:46

great like always

23

Dwight D. Eisenhower Day 451, 13:18

I just read the summary lol

26

eliwood_sain Day 451, 13:39

Nice as always

19

Kreamz Day 451, 15:48

What a dumbass...

24

Chico-Gringo-Segundo Day 451, 18:50

Thanx for info, will watch for updates.

21

Gunz N' Strikes Day 452, 00:52

I guess I'm the only one who math his a problam for him

Or

Sadr Azam Day 452, 02:50

q3 is best
because there isn't enough worker
also with your way 2 q1 company(40G) better than q2 company(40G)

17

roomin Day 452, 05:47

v & s

28

Andrana Day 452, 08:15

great and informative article as always=)

anyway, for me its Q3 thats the most profitable. i see it from the ROI and the customers. if you're a company owner and a businessman, you should think more of how long its for the ROI will take and compare it with how much money you need or want to invest. the faster ROI takes place with the bigger money you need or want to invest, the better. and you should also think of how much your customers will there be. and as far as i know, Q3 company got the best range of customers concidering its products prices.

and for those so called "english grammar nazies", can you speak and write well on other countries languages? if you cant, then dont protest on other people grammar mistakes. otherwise, you're no more than a racist=P

22

Zubix Day 452, 09:44

Nice

Or

1337 H01D1NG5 Day 452, 10:57

Among the other issues brought up, this doesn't bring up the fact that since Q1 resources are higher on the page, they get purchased more often. I've seen Q1 wood sell faster than Q2 when the Q1 actually cost more. Not tot mention for Q3, which often ends up on the second page.

31

Jewitt Day 452, 12:59

1337 has a point,
By your figuring, any combination is more profitable than another. When it comes down to it, you are ignoring the wage factor. Most countries have a limited work force in RM and because of this the wages rise as the companies grow and the workers do not.

So, a bunch of Q2s may seem nice for "bang for the buck," but the actual realization of supply and demand kill it. Is there enough demand for 1,200 pieces of Q2 wood a day (throwing a random number, my Q2 makes 120 products)? Even in the eUS where wood is a majorly consumed resource, I would guess demand around 800. So you have just gone a day only selling 3/4 of your product and that number will increase.

Why not upgrade and have two Q3's? Even with two Q4's, you still beat out the profit margins to production costs (figuring start-up as well) compared to a single Q5. Less product, more room for profit, less employees, less strain on the work market.

24

Maziyar Mirshahi Day 477, 12:27

Guys its useful for every1 it was for me cuz I did it n I had great profits k n we say its not leave it don't sub don't vote n don't comment leave this shit k