The remarkable victory of the EPC
Rigour6
Over the past several weeks, it has been this author’s unique privilege to observe the inner working of the Exiled Patriots of Canada. Despite not agreeing with the central tactic of most of their members (to apply pressure on their former homeland through the direct application of military force) I was allowed full and free access to their inner counsels.
I was also privileged, due to the goodwill of former CP Acacia Mason, to sit in on a full round of discussions/negotiations in the early days of the rebellion.
As I am sure you understand, I observed these conversations under an implied agreement to respect sources, so this article will not be a tell-all of who said and did what during the campaign which ultimately (and to my mind, astonishingly) achieved complete military success in extinguishing Canada’s foreign colonies. But in an effort to preserve some of the historical record before it is lost to history and painted over by successive attempts to propagandize, I wanted to set down some general impressions. These, for the sake of full disclosure, are from the perspective of someone who was no doubt permitted access because he was seen as sympathetic, so I cannot pretend to full objectivity, even though I have said and tried throughout to be an objective chronicler of what I observed and in a very limited way (the occasional snide joke) participated in.
It was, to be blunt, a remarkable display. The closest thing I can compare it to is fighting with Banach in the 65th Iberian in the aftermath of the Canada’s wipe, but even that did not have the sort of direct activity and esprit de crops the EPC did.
I’ll begin with how I got there and my own expectations. After the unconditional pardon to the most selfish player eCanada has ever been afflicted with, I realized it was time for me to get out. You can check past issues of this newspaper for my own explanation of my reasons for that. That was simply a personal decision. There comes a point where your continued membership in an activity which lacks integrity becomes complicity and for me I’d reached that point – with all due respect to those who did not see it that way, and as I have said before in many ways I will always acknowledge the Loyalists in particular as my superiors for staying and fighting the good fight even though they knew how hard it was going to be. In any event, I left and to me that was a sort of “wash my hands of the whole thing” moment for me. It was hard to do, but I felt immediately afterwards I had done the right thing, and still do. In any event, I had no sense that there was anything coming like there was.
However, it turns out all around me, many players, including some of the nation’s best and brightest, had also reached a tipping point. Some had already done so before even this latest travesty.
My own emigration was not designed to be part of anything bigger, nor did I expect it to have any larger influence – and I will state without false modesty that I don’t think it did. What I observed however was that others were doing the exact same thing. Voting with their feet, as Lenin called it. Certainly my departure might do little to affect eCanada (except free up some bandwidth) but I did notice some heavy hitters. You don’t lose your biggest tank, for example, without feeling that on some level.
What I totally did not expect but observed was that these same players, who had been stalwarts of the community in building player co-operation, would not be able to just go quietly, but that, ironically, their feeling of loyalty or nostalgia for what their country had meant to them would cause them to cast about for a way to rouse their former compatriots from moral slumber. I will be honest and say that at first I thought this was a combination of hubris and arrogance. As the trolls suggested, were these not players who had been used to getting their way and were now annoyed that they had been usurped? You have to remember we are talking some very heavy hitters here. But here is the fascinating thing: in the weeks that have followed I have literally read hundreds of messages from these players. And what I have observed is thoughtful, realistic, idealistic yes but extremely strategic thinking on how best to try and change the culture of eCanada. And not because this new culture would better serve those players – in fact a number of them said they would probably not come back – but because of their firm belief that a new culture was needed to save the nation and preserve the game experience for those eCanadians that remained.
There was almost constant debate, even as these players began to draw support both foreign and domestic (my own attempt to chronicle the members ironically became a recruitment tool and I had to eventually discontinue it because of the constant requests for new people to be added to the list). Given the limitations of the game, what realistically could be done? Was there any point? Wouldn’t people just say this was being done for this or that reason and should that even factor into their decisions? Some of the debate was heated. By times it was a bit like We Are the World, people were asked to “check your ego at the door”. That didn’t always happen. Some people couldn’t resist snapping at each other, or running them through when they saw a funny opening, or a chance to redress old wounds. Occasionally tone got lost and things degenerated. Rylde fell off the wagon a couple of times. I kept thinking “There is no way that a group this diverse of players this strong is going to not fly apart.” I assumed the anger they felt at what had been done to their country would soon turn them on each other. It didn’t happen. Time and time again, people with strong opinions turned back and kept their eyes on the prize.
Their conduct of foreign relations in particular was, to a person unfamiliar with that part of the game as myself, jaw-dropping. These were people who had built credibility with big players internationally and those international players of very high standing were to my surprise well informed on what the situation was and had been in Canada for some time. They got what the EPC was about instinctively and wholeheartedly. I was gobsmacked.
However, the one thing I have to confess that I was really 100% wrong about was how much this group, albeit one that had expanded in numbers substantially, could project power militarily. At a certain point, Addy Lawrence began using the phrase “raising the cost of indifference”. I thought to myself, yeah, that’s about all you’re ever going to be able to do. Maybe Canada has to make a moderately better effort to hold UK territories but I was fully convinced that there was absolutely NO WAY EPC was ever going to make a difference in one of those battles. Maybe, maybe a single round. And I predicted that failure to project power militarily would eventually show the movement to be a paper tiger and frustration at their failure to be anything other than the object of scorn would then discourage the members and cause them to turn on each other and the whole thing to fly apart.
How wrong I was.
I’ll leave it to others to conduct detailed analysis of the actual battles, and I know that victory has a thousand fathers, but the fact is that these guys actually did it. I still have a hard time believing it, and surely some propitious timing had something to do with it. But EPC through its connections, co-ordination, gifts of weapons, and most obviously direct infliction of millions of points of damage was such a large part of it that the UK CP saw fit to acknowledge their efforts openly and prominently as part of his proclamation of his nation’s liberation.
How is such a thing possible? I have to assume it was a combination of a number of things, including:
- Fatigue of Canada’s allies with all the time jumping in to moderate our internal mess
- Fatigue of a number of Canadians with fighting for colonies over and over again
- Heartening of the effort of UK liberationists as they saw the opportunity EPC presented
- Failure, for whatever reason, of the Norsefire network to effectively counter this military challenge.
The last in particular I am baffled by, because on the political front it seems Norsefire is able to repel all boarders without much difficulty. Why did they not stir themselves to repel an actual military campaign waged by a much smaller group? Surely it was a golden opportunity for a certain someone to actually earn his self-proclaimed laurels as a hero and patriot. Is it that he didn’t give a crap about the bonuses for the broader nation or he just couldn’t match the strength of EPC? I suspect that maybe Norsefire couldn't expend their tanks to defend Canada because they chose to stockpile them instead for bribes to hold on to political power, but that's conjecture. I honestly don’t know and I have zero confidence that we’ll ever get a straight answer out of him and his trolls. But whatever the whys are, it is the what I am amazed at.
And then, having achieved total victory in their military objectives, EPC Just. Stopped. They debated what the next steps would be, again there were different sides. They noted that a lot had been stirred up in the Canadian culture but that no real tangible progress had been made yet, but at the end of the day, they’d set an objective, they’d achieved it, and they just shook hands and walked off in several directions. It was like that scene at the end of the Oceans movies where everyone just smiles and heads back to their own thing. Some had already chosen to return to Canada before that to work from within and in co-operation with Loyalists. Others were still weighing their response to Loyalist appeals to return. Some just went back to the lives they’d had before EPC, be they quiet or focused on other things.
When the smoke cleared, so many people had left the CIA Military Unit that I, your humble narrator was left in charge. (My first daily order as new Commander is to fight for Canada vs. the UK, btw)
Will we see the EPC take action again? I’d like to say I have my doubts but they have so thoroughly exceeded my expectations at almost every juncture to date that I dare not rule it out. As they themselves discussed, the problems in Canada are deep and will require long term and heavy effort to correct. Even something as simple as allowing people true freedom of democratic choice in forming a party with others who share their goals unfortunately requires a huge effort against the vandals. There are many long days ahead and no doubt many of the former members of EPC, tarred as they will be with the brush of traitor, will be continuing to work for what they believe in. I suspect they will wear the Class of 2012 badge with pride.
It has been one of the most remarkable displays I have ever had the occasion to witness in my almost three years in the game. And although I never agreed with the strategy of direct military action, I have to admit it has been far more successful and effective than I predicted. More than that, however, it has been frankly inspiring and a privilege to observe a diverse group as this one, strong opinions, but united in their desire to do what needed to be done to make Canada a better place. Some will say they should have focused their efforts in other arenas, and that is a debate which will no doubt rage on for a long time. But the results are there, and the culture of the nation is no longer in slow sleepy decay but now churns with active and engaged debate about what eCanada is and should be.
For my part, I am returning to my quiet life in Maine, my new home. I hope to resume publishing on matters economic and various legal proposals. I don’t know even now if what EPC did was right. I can say with absolute certainty from detailed observation that it was done for the right reasons. And as a silverback who thought that my way of looking at the eworld - asking what one can do for one’s fellow man first, seeking to do what is right rather than what is expedient – doomed me to a life of isolation, it was immensely heartening to see experienced, powerful players who just fundamentally got that things like honour and integrity matter – even here in the eworld. And so I end this experience personally revitalized and forever grateful for being allowed to observe and in some small way be part of the noble crusade that was EPC.
Gentlemen, it has been an honour.
o7
N x NE, Volume 4, Number 3
Comments
~hyuu~
I don't usually vote EPC related articles, but when I do RIgour6 is the one writing them.
~hyuu~
A long time ago my friend and I took a piss on the neighbor's flowers, we high-fived and walked into the sunset. One of our greatest memories.
It's been an honor to work alongside so many noatable players for such a worthy goal. Hopefully this action will have the intended impact of reducing indifference to the corruption and general crappiness of eCanadian culture. Only time will tell I suppose. So thanks to th EPC class of 2012, it's been awesome. Until next time, "Down the road is where I'll always be".
o7
With all due respect, I think you inflate the role of the EPC heavily from behind the tint of those rose coloured glasses.
Lets examine the facts factually. EPC was not all that successful in taking the colonies. During my last month in office I believe we lost oil for a couple of days at most and swiftly returned to full control of our colonies. If you wish to point at the success of ousting eCanada from the eUK I think you need to look at broader issues.
The fact is, ONE is angry with Trenton Rendell. He took control of the ONE newspaper via an org using a perfectly legitimate game mechanic and pilfered the newspaper for a few hours. This in turn enraged a few of the heaviest ONE hitters who have since decided that actions speak louder than words. ONE has organized heavily in the rout of eCanada from the eUK. Indeed, when you look at the most recent battle stats, there are next to no EPC hitters and almost as few eUK hitters in those battles. The biggest damage coming from ONE members who are taking their pound of flesh over the newspaper fiasco.
There is no question that EPC has and continues to push an agenda of their own. I agree with standing up for what you believe to be right, but I DO NOT agree with the manner.
In the end, if you are going to write an epilogue on the role of the EPC, make sure you remove said glasses and include the other circumstances which have REALLY led to the removal of eCanada from the eUK. Revisionist history and painting over, as you refer to it, is something we all have to avoid, even if it means the team we are pulling for is getting less of the credit than we would like.
βλεπομεν γαρ αρτι δι εσοπτρου εν αινιγματι Acacia 🙂
Rigour6 is a great guy o7
Honestly, I think I have been fair in saying I don't truly know exactly how EPC did it or to what degree they did. I mention 4 other factors I think played a part in it and I quote Ciano's victory has a thousand fathers.
I could point out that a certain former CP was very vocal in laying a LOT of the blame for the loss of colonies at the feet of the EPC - but he may have been roleplaying at the time.
I will note the fact that Canada continues to lose domestic battles now that EPC has suspended operations does tend to support the hypothesis that EPC was not the dominant factor in the loss of the colonies.
Of course, the corollary of that is that if Canada starts to win domestic battles now, EPC's role in the loss of the colonies looks larger.
I wish we had the tools we used to in order to assess direct damage from EPC members. Facts are a wonderful antidote to anecdote.
As someone who has been actively close to the current state of affairs, I can say categorically that the resurgence of ONE has been the driving force of the issue.
Needless to say, when one is in power, one has to have an enemy with which to rally the troops. Placing blame motivates those whom you need to motivate. In the end, I believe I left office with all our colonies and bonuses in tact...and kept it that way for say 90% of my term. Roleplaying is a requirement in politics no?
وأنا بالتأكيد تقريبا على وشك إطلاق الجهاد ضدهم الكابتن Kushskins
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/canadian-national-protection-party-2010305/1/20
sorry for the spam
We must be thinking of different times. The rant I am referencing took place AFTER the CP had left office.
But perhaps he was laying the groundwork for a future campaign. That would be good news for my former country.
I believe what the Right Honourable Gentleman said, and I quote:
"Congrats EPC on strengthening a ONE alliance member. When they come to wipe us we will be sure to give you credit for that too. I will never forget any of you. No matter how you try to spin it, if eCanada is wiped or ONE gains footing because of this, the blame will be squarely on you, and I will personally see to it that History has your names etched permanently in our list of most notorious traitors to the state."
Now, of course this may have been hyperbole, or as my grandfather calls it, horse$#!+.
Or it may be the former CP has changed his mind and doesn't really feel the same way today. After all, these quotes above are from a full two days ago.
So who won the campaign hero medals in East Midlands, Wales, Y & H, when the UK reclaimed them? As Rigour said, victory has a thousand fathers, and EPC did have a strong role in those victories. But it's over, and I'm sure there will be many future attempts at revisionism around these events.
Outstanding article, albeit a bit long, but it was well worth it!
Well I'm glad we did this. It surely did raise the cost of indifference and we saw some new player stepping their game up in terms of activity. Namely Wombat25, and probably many more. From my point of view, we we're successfull in sparking something, be it in reaction or against us. The End result is still that a good kick was given and the country look to be heading toward something better.
Since a few days I started hitting back for Canada, namely in QC yesterday. I know many of my fellow EPC'er will do just the same.
@Rigour6;
o7, an absolute pleasure to read, and you were a bigger part of it than you give yourself credit for. Some rebels put down damage, some rebels call in political favours, some rebels work their network of friends, and some rebels make their mark with their pen. Your compass heading is always true Rigour, trust it.
@Acacia;
U mad bro? To be candid, you are just as biased as Rigour is. So I draw your attention to CP Talon Karrde, who is biased to his nation and ONE and yet he still acknowledged the effort of EPC in liberating those colonies. The fact remains that each point of damage by EPC was worth double given that it should have been on the "home" side. For the period of this rebellion, each rebel was hitting two times their weight. The bottom line of Rigour's article is that EPC was much more relevant politically and on the battlefield than anyone anticipated it would be, and it opened his eyes to elements of this game that he hadn't seen before.
Good job, Rigour. Good job EPC.
Always a pleasure and a honour knowing people like EPC.
Yes EPC was very good at fighting for ONE. Moronic jokes are why the ONE offensive has continued without EPC help. Lets divide credit equally between traitors and morons.
Make sure you leave a nice big slice for the thieves and antidemocrats who started it all.
"After all, these quotes above are from a full two days ago." X2
It has always been really, really hard to pin down what two-face Mason really thinks about any topic.
"The last in particular I am baffled by, because on the political front it seems Norsefire is able to repel all boarders without much difficulty. Why did they not stir themselves to repel an actual military campaign waged by a much smaller group?"
It is simple;The Thief cares about no one but himself. The Thief has no honor, he fights for no one, let alone eCanada.
Great article, Rigour o7
Really nice article Rigour6 - thank you for a satisfying read.
When you have a bit of time could you do up something equally readable on the "30 players".
Yesterday I paid about 1700 in taxes to the US treasury. I also noted that ecanada's budgeted daily tax receipts are about 51,000. 51000/1700 = 30 or so.
btw: I was ranked 1361 in the US until Acacia Mason got his citizenship here. Now he is 1361, and I continue to drop: 1362 now. Welcome Acacia.
As always, you have put into words, what has been the heart and soul of this project. I have greatly enjoyed the time spent with all involved.
Every once and a while a bit of true human spirit shows itself in this game, this has been one of those times.
Truly the only reason I keep playing.
WTF i just see 29836487638796283764 character on this article.
didnt read o/
I didn't read the wally of text that was the article, or the comments to this article.
I'm assuming that the EPC is taking credit for pushing eCanada out of the eUK. What I want to know is, how did you get eBulgaria to leave EDEN, because really, that's the only reason the tide turned.
We sent them nudez of crisfire. .
EPC may not have completed their explicit goals, but they damn sure provoked an improvement in the eCanadian community.
What's different politically now compared to 60 days ago?
😁😁😁😁😁😁
epc has suspended operations
acacia is an american citizen
more young canadians are acting courageously in defence of core values
there is a reappraisal of the wisdom of the pardon
some are starting to think about the cost of loosing good players
others are beginning to reappraise the impact of a few powerful players
sperry and plugson have joined in the encouragement of "building" instead of "destroying"
US interests in the region are of greater interest to its administration and population
EPC suspends operations
etc
EPC suspends operations
a journalist writes a perceptive, fair and even handed piece for your consideration -it is worth a read.
Glad I was there and read all the stuff I did along the way.
Fair to say I would not make any of my decisions differently, since I'm both happy to have participated in discussions but also thankful that I saved up my hoard of bars and bazookas for the liberation of eCanada. But the better part was seeing a side of everyone usually not so easily viewed ~ was interesting.
EPC played a role that people will over-rate or under-play. The fact remains that it had people's attention and continues to do so. The actions hurt, yet overall, there was no deep malice. I believe EPCers had the right heart and made some right moves, even if a large number of people will not support their actions completely, including me.
@Beeman...Perhaps the EPC leaving just left room for others who didn't feel they could get involved before? Perhaps the removal of the towering redwoods has allowed a new forest to emerge?
Only one Redwood that needs cutting.