The Most Useless Discussions in the World #1
•
by pr3zzyy
Hello Dear Readers,
Because life is boring I have decided to bring to you a new series of articles
May I present
As I hope you are intelligent enough to see from the above banner, the series will be focused on:
The most Useless Discussions In the World
Today's Discussion: Which came first - The Chicken or the Egg?
*pause for audience expectancy applause 😉
*
The Chicken! No! The Egg! No, no, no!! The Chicken!! No wait... what?
That's right people it is time to put an end to this worldwide conundrum.
Possible Solutions:
1. The Chicken
2. The Egg
3. Neither Exist. They are all holograms put in place by the government to confuse us
The Debate:
1. The Chicken: For an Egg to come into existence it requires a chicken to lay it
2. The Egg: For a Chicken to come into existence it requires an egg to hatch from
3. Neither Exist: Umm... ... Aliens ... ... ?
The Solution(s):
Now then obviously we have to find a way to appease all interested parties so here goes.
The secret to this puzzle is lies in your religion.
If you are a creationist then you believe that God created all animals etc etc, and therefore the Chicken came first.
However if you are an evolutionist you believe that they 'evolved' and here is where most of us have the problem. But NO MORE!
Here is what happened (If you're an evolutionist).
Basically, many, many moons ago there was a chicken-like bird. It was genetically close to a chicken, but wasn't a full-blown chicken yet. Lets call it a proto-chicken. So proto-hen had an egg, and proto-rooster fertilized it. But when the genes from ma and pa almost-chicken fused, they combined in a new way, creating a mutation that accidentally made the baby different from its parents. Although it would take millennia for the difference to be noticed, that egg was different enough to become the official progenitor of a new species, now known as … the chicken! So in a nutshell (or an eggshell, if you like), two birds that weren't really chickens created a chicken egg, and hence, we have an answer: The egg came first, and then it hatched a chicken.
If you are psychopath then obviously neither exist 🙂
So there you go, you can now sleep easy at night. Spread the word and help make everyone's life less confusing!
The below are links to valuable sources of information for eAustralians young and old, so please feel free to use them as they are there to help you.
Proud citizen and MoEE of eAust
Endorse, Shout, Subscribe and Vote.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
pertamaxxx!
🙂
[The secret to this puzzle is lies in your religion.
If you are a creationist then you believe that God created all animals etc etc, and therefore the Chicken came first.]
love it.
LMAO. Prez, you got WAY too much time on your hands!
Pr3zzyy, I have either been working you to hard and you finally snapped or you have broken into my liquor cabinet again or you have been spending too much time with a bong and some Cheech and Chong movies (for the kiddies just think Jay and Silent Bob)..... Either way the article made me smile and wonder.
Whoever had the crusty sock came first...
Sounds like you have played soggy sao before Hugh 😛
If you study the agriculture of ancient China and Southeast Asia you will find that the egg really did come first. The chicken is not a result of random genetic mutation. The chicken has been genetically modified over the course of thousands of years by man. It is the corn of the bird world or the cow of the bovine world. It's closest wild ancestor is a wild fowl that lives in the jungles of Vietnam.
Thus the chicken is a bad metaphor for the Creationism Vs. Evolution Debate.
And speaking of Cheech and Chong, they have gotten back together and have taken their comedy shows to the Indian casinos of California. Word is they're writing a new movie.
Sweet... but I know have to do random drug tests and I doubt Cheech and Chong will be funny while being straight.
There's medical marijuana in California and marijuana is totally legal in other states. There's lots of jokes they can make about that. They don't have to smoke it anymore. They know how people act when high. They can act like it without having to smoke it.
Chicken come first and evolved into an egg layer.
The DRAGON came first 🙂
Now, now, we're being scientific here. We're not some Cimmerian mystic hunched over a set of fossilized bones wondering what sort of creature that came from. It's not a dragon. It's a dinosaur. So yes, the dinosaur came first.
Well technically the 'proto-dinosaur' came first 😉
The Rooster came 1st!!!!
Just like Adam came 1st then Eve from his rib
The amount of people that don't realize their mistake in saying this is astounding 😑
A rooster IS a chicken 😑
A hen IS a chicken 😑
What you said is like saying that
Men came before humans...
---
For those of you still confuse😛
A rooster is a male chicken.
A hen is a female chicken.
---
A man is a male human.
A woman is a female human.
---
I think I've made myself clear.. ?
But your argument is confusing because thats like me saying....well
a male is a homosapien and a female is a homosapien.
If we are going to get technical then you can not call a rooster and a hen a chicken.
A hen needs a rooster to reproduce, otherwise her eggs are duds. So i do not know why you are confused by it, a hen on her own can not have off springs. And looking at our understanding of evolution every A sexual animal known to man has always had a "penis" grown 1st fallowed by a internal vagina to support the offspring egg or whatever the case might be.
So by saying the rooster came 1st is by far the most logical answer to your question.
1. It's Homo Sapiens (2 words, yes it matters according to the internetz)
2. Umm yes that statement is accurate.. (besides for point 3), Homo Sapiens is just a way of saying human but using two words...(OK yes it clarifies it to the current breed of humans - according to the evolution theory, but your original comment seems to be themed on the creation theory so that is irrelevant)
3. Male does not mean man and female does not mean woman, it is an adjective to define the gender of any different species.
4. Ok wtf... (granted I am no evolution expert, but again your original comment seems to be themed on the creation theory so that is irrelevant). Also 'A hen needs a rooster to reproduce' ... and a rooster doesn't need a hen??
5. No there is no logical way at all, that could even be an answer, because the question is: Which came first? The Chicken or the Egg?
5.1 - There was only 2 possible answers outlined in the question. And it was gender irrelevant.
5.2 - The question was never which came first, the rooster or the hen???
Evolution and Religion teaches us both that man was created 1st. Not trying to be sexist but yea.
And your home sapiens word technically is incorrect because i was not referencing to a specific point in the evolution chart. But the "humans" before the homo sapiens where in deed called Homosapien, one word
I stand corrected about the homo sapiens thingy, homo sapiens sapiens is what i was thinking of. LOL so three words XD
I can't find anywhere online that points to it being one word.. only the opposite (but who actually gives a fck about that...)
I don't know anything about evolution, so I will not argue the point about which came first, also because it is still irrelevant to the actual question 🙂
The 1st chicken was a hermaphrodite ....
Chikens can come/fly from everywhere, but the eggs cannot 😛
you can meet chicken anywhere, they are more and are first
pozzzzz
A chicken can actually fly ..... for 13 seconds
Yes 🙂 Straight down 😉 (Joke, IK I've seen them fly onto roofs b4)