The eUS is Greater: My personal endorsement (fwiw)
Ananias
I have been very fortunate in eRepublik, I have met extraordinary players and have achieved a lot during my short time here. I spend far more time playing the game than I probably should, but it provides the kind of escape from the maudlin routines of RL. As many of you are aware, my identity in eRepublik has been strongly intertwined with the United States Workers Party ever since the December 25th Congressional elections. I am halfway through my third, and final, term as Party President. With the support of the USWP delegation, and many of my colleagues from differing parties, and following 6 terms in Congress, I have received the honor of being selected as Speaker of the House for the 19th and 20th eUS Congressional classes. I am very proud and grateful for my association with the United States Workers Party, not because of the exceptional support they have provided for my political career, but because of the exceptional and diversely gifted individuals that comprise the active members.
As might be expected, most players that know me find it challenging to divorce my personal perspectives from my political affiliation. For the few minutes that is takes you to read this though, I would ask that you accept my thoughts as being my personal view as coming from a fellow citizen and not the “Political Hack” that I am commonly perceived as by opponents of the USWP, and not the “Party Guy” that I am commonly perceived as by the membership of the United States Workers Party.
For the balance of this article I’m just going to be an eUS Citizen, sans any party affiliation, sharing my viewpoint as someone who has been engaged in the game for a long enough time to know of that which I share.
I want to be President of the eUnited States of America.
I believe that is a shared dream by anyone that has ever participated in voting for eUS President on the 5th of each month. There is something about the idea of having your name listed as a candidate, followed by party endorsements, that, I think, is tantalizing to every eUS citizen. And I am certainly not excluded from the draw of sitting in the virtual Oval Office, making decisions and pushing buttons that affect the game experience of thousand of eRepublik citizens domestically and globally.
It would be dishonest for me to say that I would not run for president at a moments notice if I thought I had the support to do so, it would be dishonest for me to say that I do not deeply envy Harrison Richardson, Emerick, Richard Brophy, Lowell Kennedy, et al. for their opportunity…the key being that envy, status and/or lust for power are poor motivations for public service, even in a virtual nation.
I have had the extraordinary privilege during the Scrabman administration of participating as a (hopefully) trusted advisor and, sometimes confidant, of President Scrabman, as such, I am very disappointed to see him retire. And that is not for the sake of my position of influence, which has waned greatly over the last several weeks anyway, I will be disappointed because I know that the eUS will be losing the hardest working player in America.
While some of you may disagree with the product of his efforts, I can assure every citizen in the eUS that Scrabman was one of those rare players that brought his “A” game to the Oval Office…every…single… day…of his long tenure. At times we may have disagreed on the minutiae, but he has always proven, day in and day out, that his motivations and efforts were exclusively focused on the success of the eUnited States.
It is perhaps because of my disappointment in seeing Scrabman leave office in a few days, regardless of the personal merit of the decision, that I found myself in the awkward position of dispassionate campaigning for anyone that would follow him, even my good friends Harrison Richardson, Emerick and Lowell Kennedy. For that, my friends, I apologize, as it is the one quantifiable contribution of value that I can make.
Before I can continue in this article evaluating the primary contestants in this campaign, Harrison Richardson and Emerick, I must first offer my congratulations to the other worthy candidates in the race. Lowell, we have PM’d on many occasions and I wish you great success in the elections, you are one of the most intelligent and articulate players I have met in the game and the citizens of the eUS are very fortunate to have you as a choice, and more importantly, the very fortunate for the opportunity to get to know you better.
Emerick may be “Great”…but the eUnited States of America IS exponentially greater.
While I was not terribly surprised to see Emerick declare his candidacy for president this term, I must admit to some surprise that he chose to subordinate his intelligence, qualifications and experience to a “cult of personality” campaign.
For those of you that were unaware of this, I originated the term “beta-giants”, in its most negative connotation, substantially in reference to Emerick. When I first started in Congress and participating on the eUS forums, Emerick was the consistent enough in his efforts to marginalize and humiliate new players for me to consider him the pre-eminent eRepublik version of an MMORPG “Player Killer”. He was extraordinarily effective at driving new players, even myself to quit, or at least seriously consider quitting, the game. In fact, I believe that my PM to the Admins when I originally wanted my character deleted several months ago specifically mentioned him and several other “beta-giants” that had made the game a "bust" in my opinion.
Over time I decided to return to an active role in eRepublik, ostensibly to support Scrabman in his run for President and hang out with my friend, tdwester. After re-engaging, I was provided the opportunity to get to know Emerick better and have many IRC conversations with him. I developed a greater respect for his knowledge of the game and his unusual wit. I now consider him a friend, as well as a knowledgeable and creative resource in the game.
I do not question Emerick’s qualification for the Presidency. I do not question Emerick’s experience for the Presidency. I do not question Emerick’s capability for the Presidency. But, given my experience and relationship with him, I seriously question Emerick’s motivation for the Presidency.
Throughout my time spent playing eRepublik, I have been a consistent and passionate advocate of eUS success as a nation unified by the common purpose of eRepublik victory. eRepublik is a game, and as such, I believe it can be won. Not by individual effort, but by collective focus and progress toward that end…while, I firmly believe that I, Ananias, cannot win this game individually; I just as firmly believe the the eUS can win this game as a team.
There are many that disagree very passionately with my perspective, and I respect their approach of focusing efforts toward the growth and strength of the social networking aspect of eRepublik. I think there is room for both views. Of all the intelligent and passionate opponents of my e-worldview, the foremost has been Emerick…who considers me philosophically delusional for my advocacy and promotion of my "unity to the common purpose of eUS victory" mindset.
Simply put, Emerick does not believe that the eUS can win, and while I know that there is a large contingent of players that share his viewpoint, is raises the question in my mind of why he would be interested in leading the very team that he does not believe can be victorious, or even successful, in our combined endeavors…and further, where would Emerick lead us?
Perhaps, that is the reason that I find the idea of eUS voters selecting our next president in response to the lulz shouts “Emerick is Great” particularly disturbing, because it fosters and encourages the failed notion that an individual leader’s “greatness” equates to eUS “greatness”, when the fact remains that eUS “greatness” is incumbent upon the unity and focused resolve of our nation as a team toward the common goal of victory (whatever the definition).
The eUS needs to stop depending on “great leaders” and start “leading with greatness” as a nation.
In order to do that, we need to select those that are willing to serve and contribute to our collective goals as a nation rather than those that would strive to leadership for the sole purpose of attaining the power and authority to defeat those very goals.
That brings me to my personal endorsement of Harrison Richardson for President of the eUnited States of America during the elections on July 5th, 2009.
Toward total disclosure, I would have loved to have been the choice to run for President this term from my party, it would have been a great honor and fulfilled a dream that every eUS citizen harbors to some degree: to have an opportunity to be elected to the most coveted and influential office that exists in eRepublik (until the development of the coveted "Lord Master of the Virtual Universe" is released with eRep Version 27). I think I would have been a reasonable choice, just as Emerick and his supporters consider their candidate as a “Great” choice, but, my fellow citizens, this is about making the right choice. You deserve better than a reasonable candidate, you deserve better than a “Great” candidate…
My fellow eAmericans, you deserve the right President to complement and contribute to your greatness; and the right President is Harrison Richardson
While I could write several hundred more words on his exceptional qualifications, abundant experience and proven capabilities; the deciding factor in personally choosing to endorse Harrison Richardson is that I am assured of his motivations:
Harrison Richardson wants to contribute to eUS success and, eventually, victory in eRepublik.
Harrison Richardson is a proven contributor and public servant that will continue in the tradition of bringing his “A” game to the Oval Office in support of our national goals. The greatest difference between Harrison and his nearest competitor for the Presidency, is that, every single day in office, Harrison will be moving our nation forward toward prosperity as a contributor TO the unified team effort rather than moving the nation backward toward unchecked Presidential power as an opponent of our unified team effort.
I personally endorse Harrison Richardson for President of the eUnited States of America during the July 5th, 2009 elections.
Emerick may be “Great”, but the eUnited States of America IS exponentially greater…I believe that on July 5th we will make a choice between the two options.
I choose eUS success.
I choose Harrison Richardson.
Ananias - eUS Citizen
Comments
HRmaxx!
Ananias, I wanted you as my Press Secretary but I will happily choose someone else! Congratulations, Mr. Speaker!
I just read it all again. So eloquent. Brilliantly written.
*Cues Emerick's supporters coming to his defense*
Once again, best of luck HR!
Excellent piece, Ananias. Brilliantly written indeed, sir...
We hate to see you go Scrabman....
but...
VOTE HARRISON RICHARDSON FOR PRESIDENT!
That was wonderfully written, Ananias. I know that every word was heartfelt.
HR for President!
Nice article. This is an interesting campaign.
Although I do not share your support of this candidate, your article was very
well written. I appreciate your views, and hope you will run for President
someday. From what I have read just now, you'd be a decent one. Which is something I can't say for any of the other candidates.
This was an amazing piece of work, and I completely agree.
Harrison for President in July.
Ananias for President after Harrison.
wat. Did you just write an article basically calling me unAmerican?
wat.
>I seriously question Emerick’s motivation for the Presidency.
Exegesis is required.
>Emerick does not believe that the eUS can win
Because there's nothing to win. Are you trying to make stupid arguments and baseless rhetoric? Because that's exactly what you're doing here, Ananias. You're no better than Ajay. Just better-spoken.
>where would Emerick lead us?
My goal is the same as every other presidential candidate before me- to increase the quality of America all around. In congress, I've been working on perfecting our wiki and bringing more greatness to our media - two areas that are lacking. I don't overlook anything and I strive to increase the fun for every American, whether that's with a monthly prize or more great military policy.
>failed notion that an individual leader’s “greatness” equates to eUS “greatness”, when the fact remains that eUS “greatness” is incumbent upon the unity and focused resolve of our nation as a team toward the common goal of victory (whatever the definition).
That's not entirely true. With a great leader, the nation will be drawn towards him and therefore drawn together.
All in all, senseless rhetoric and blindly questioning my patriotism.
Voted.
Would you mind returning the favour? 🙂
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/workers-of-the-world-vote-hassan--846310/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/work[..]/1/20
I have many problems with this article, but my main one is this: The only other "worthy" candidate in the race (other than Em and HR) is Lowell Kennedy? Are you serious?
Shu-nah-nuh-gunz.
Amazing article.
senseless
No Richard, the only ones with which I communicate with on a regular basis are HR, Em and LK...I stated that:
"it would be dishonest for me to say that I do not deeply envy Harrison Richardson, Emerick, Richard Brophy, Lowell Kennedy, et al. for their opportunity"
Note you were mentioned as well, I simply did not lie and state that you were my friend, as we only have a passing acquaintance. I consider that my loss.
@Emerick: "All in all, senseless rhetoric and blindly questioning my patriotism."
Now there is a strawman argument in action (though I'm used to them 😁. When did this become about patriotism? I approach the game in one way, you approach the game in an entirely different way. You stated yourself: "Because there's nothing to win", my personal endorsement is for the candidate that most similarly matches my approach to the game.
I am not saying that you are not a patriot (and I never would), I am saying that you do not believe that victory is possible which follows the fact that you do not believe that such a thing exists, therefore your entire agenda is predicated on goals which have great merit from a social or educational aspect but have nothing to do with achieving eUS victory by whatever definition that takes.
Therefore your assertion that you are trying to make America more fun: "I don't overlook anything and I strive to increase the fun for every American, whether that's with a monthly prize or more great military policy." is disengenous as you are trying to make it more fun from your perspective of what fun is. I think eUS victory in the game would be SERIOUS fun.
And by what definition would your military policy be "great" when you not only disbelieve victory to be possible, you deny the very existence of eUS victory?
You approach the game very successfully from a social networking aspect, that is why I enjoy my conversations with you; I want the eUS to win the game, which you find delusional (or "stupid")...
...the eUS will decide on July 5th what approach the want to take...
Personally, I'll go with Harry's direction this time around.
There is a reason why Ananias is the best President of the best party in the world.
Ananias, great article. I will state my example of the greatest amount of fun I've ever had in eRep: watching the O.T. battle in Central Greece when we tanked the crap out of PEACE and won. In fact, there were so many people watching and commenting it was incredible. Elections are fun and all but nothing beats winning. NOTHING. Everything else is just window dressing.
HR for President.
Thumbs up to Vincent Garibaldi.
Ananias, I am extremely disappointed in this article. Though it started off well enough, I can't help but feel like all you did was bend over backwards to paint Emerick in a negative light he doesn't deserve. I can't help but wonder if you were put up to this because of your party obligations; this is NOT the Ananias I know.
~ Geno Garon
>Really? Maybe you have thin skin. Emerick was in fact the first person to friend me, to give me advice on setting up a gifting buddy network, to encourage me to play the game and have fun. I am far from the only person who feels this way.
Thanks for bringing that up. That reminds me of why I acted the way I did for so long- to make stronger players who weren't easily beaten down by propaganda, were willing to make hard and fast decisions, think for themselves, and are creative. Geno and Vincent, who I claim to mentor(whether they like it or not), are great examples of my philosophy. Though they both moved out of the US, they retain their love for America despite being granted high positions in foreign countries. In fact, a lot of my friends are ex-American patriots who still love their country. Why have they moved? Because of internal bickering caused by aggressive policking. I even moved once because of it, but after not too long, I moved back to try to fix the situation. Now, in congress, I've already made political allies with people from across the political spectrum. We do have a problem in America, and I believe that it's caused by greedy parties trying to "win it all".
The most common argument against people who make arguments that I just did is, "well, what's wrong with trying to win?" It causes division in the country. And then it causes other parties to work their asses off, and in the end, America is bickering while their allies are taken over by their enemies.
Sorry, off topic rant. But still. Stop fucking around, American politics.
Both sides are making some excellent points here. Very good arguments.
I understand Emerick's concept of winning.
Ananias, you make it sound like there is an End Game--a final resolution to eRepublik; but from what I can understand of the game I do not think this is possible. The larger one nation gets, the more other nations will oppose it. I certainly don't see the eUSA winning the game alone. It would have to have allies.
But if by winning we mean a model of persistent excellence and growth in eAmerica, then yes I can see that.
@Ananias: Cool. We should chat. You seem nice.
"Emerick was the consistent enough in his efforts to marginalize and humiliate new players for me to consider him the pre-eminent eRepublik version of an MMORPG “Player Killer”. He was extraordinarily effective at driving new players, even myself to quit, or at least seriously consider quitting, the game."
QFT Emerick is the worst choice possible. He is going to work on the wiki while the rest of the world advances and dominate the globe.
Voted.
Haha, nice the comments are better than the article was
Nice job ignoring everything in my platform but the domestic policies, Perrin. Try reading my article again, maybe you'll see this:
"Of course I'm going to fund the military. We have a huge surplus, and it makes the most sense to direct most of the money towards the military, since that's our most money-intensive and important branch of the government. It goes without saying. Also, congress has been working on putting this into effect. This is not in of the President's job description, but I figured I'd put it in here since my opponent did, and I'd hate to lose voters to him because they aren't aware of that."
I know many others have commented on this but when you sai😛
"Emerick does not believe the eUSA can win."
What exactly did you mean? Please tell me how you - or HR - would "win" the game.
I find it appropriate to note that I am writing this from an undecided view point, and I want nothing more than an articulate response as to what "winning" the game actually entails.
I await with eager anticipation.
It is my fear that government in its good intentions may overrun many boundaries. Please read the article before the linked article, as well as the linked article (they are a 2 part series). Harrison is intelligent, strong, and capable - but it is my most sincere hope that in this, we keep our liberty secure.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/continuation-of-planning-and-democracy-847354/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/cont[..]/1/20
Of course I'm going to fund the military. We have a huge surplus, and it makes the most sense to direct most of the money towards the military, since that's our most money-intensive and important branch of the government. It goes without saying. Also, congress has been working on putting this into effect. This is not in of the President's job description, but I figured I'd put it in here since my opponent did, and I'd hate to lose voters to him because they aren't aware of that."
Whats the point in having an army your against deploying? We wouldn't want to be....disliked...gasp. And if you do deploy the military what is the point in having a president who deploys the army without the intention of becoming the greatest nation in the eUS and winning. If you want to know what winning is then look at Hungaria and Indonesia. In my opinion they are winning because they are the most powerful nations in the world. Its a game not a social network. Go chat on AIM for that. Sounds more like your arena.
Derp derp. When did I ever say I was against deploying the military?
You didn't. Btw how long would Hungry and Indonesia be the two strongest nations if they didn't have the rest of PEACE backing them up?
Nice article Ananias.
Very well written article, but I dislike all the negative comments regarding Emerick. This article would better serve praising Harrison Richardson, rather than discrediting Emerick.
Emerick is Great.
Answer me this....Why would I choose a leader who dosen't want to lead me anywhere? Like Ananias said, you approach the game in such a different way than I do, I could never endorse you or agree to allow you any type of say or power.
But seriously besides the fact that you are a poor leader (popular with no substance/goals/direction) I just don't like you. I was so berated by your conduct and that of your lacky Rhane that I wanted to never play again. Thats not what I call a leader...
Excellent article.
HR FTW!
nice job ananias!!!voted
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/happy-4th-of-july--847988/1/all" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/happ[..]1/all
"I could never endorse you or agree to allow you any type of say or power"
Wow, and here I thought this was America
Emerick is great.