Some thoughts on the status quo
BeJIuKaH
Hello dear readers,
Today I'm going to bother you with some of my thoughts upon the hottest of the topics these days - the new shuffling of the alliances around the eWorld...
I know, it has been widely spoken about this particular topic, but still I want to share my personal opinion on it and I do not want you to feel obliged to agree with me on the matter. So, let's move on to the point of the article itself.
N.B. The information I used to create this is up to this current hour of writing the article.
I've divided the countries into 4 different sections... 3 sections for an Alliance and 1 extra section for Neutrals/Countries not yet revealed their intentions or decided whether to join an alliance or not.
We'll begin with Sphere of Alliance 1. That would be the countries of Poland - Spain - USA - Croatia - Bosnia - Albania - UK - Italy - Mexico - Peru - Brazil - Estonia - Latvia - Lithuania - Belarus - Belgium - Cyprus - Iran - Phillippines - Pakistan - Netherlands - Switzerland
Sphere of Alliance 2: Serbia - Slovenia - Romania - Argentina - NZ - Bolivia - Israel - Montenegro - Portugal - Singapore - Moldova - Thailand - Uruguay
Sphere of Alliance 3: Bulgaria - Chile - MKD - Russia - India - Indonesia - Paraguay - Canada - Finland - Sweden - Norway - Germark - Japan - South Korea
And finally, the 4th section:
Hungary >> Serbia?? >> Romanian issue
Ireland >> A1/A3 >> Croatian betrayal over the Irish, considering them as not as important as the UK
France >> Serbia?? >> Croatian betrayal by allying with Poland (no need to mention why the French happen to think that way)
Australia >> Serbia??
Austria >> Serbia??
China >> A1/A2 >> This is gonna be tough
RoC >> What China does
Columbia >> ??
Venezuela >> ??
Czech Rep. >> Prolly Poland??
Egypt >> Neutral
North Korea >> Neutral
Malaysia >> N/A
Saudi Arabia >> Neutral
Slovakia >> SRB/PL??
South Africa >> Neutral (pro-Brazil)
UAE >> Neutral
Ukraine >> N/A
Turkey >> ??
EDIT Greece >> SRB/PL?? >> I got convinced that these guys might as well choose A1 as Hungary is now signing a MPP with Macedonia and if it is accepted and SerHun remains, I think Greece won't have place in A2. It's all possible now
🙂
N.B. A1 = Alliance 1 and etc.
What is most probably about to happen:
- Option 1 (30% chance of happening imho) Alliance 1 vs. Alliance 2 + Alliance 2 vs. Alliance 3 + Alliance 1 vs. Alliance 3 => Tripolar eWorld
- Option 2 (40% chance) Alliance 1 vs Alliance 2 + Alliance 3
- Option 3 (30% chance) Alliance 1 + Alliance 3 vs. Alliance 2
One last thing I want to make clear... These spheres of influence are not supposed to be like a shell, where nobody could go outside that shell and can't sign MPP with other countries, like it was common until recently... No. There will probably be common MPPs between countries from alliances, which are not on the same side... but that would be understandable only if the eWorld happens to become tripolar - a thing that would be rather new for us
🙂
Have a nice day ahead!
😉
Comments
Interesting ideas.
Who knows what the future will be like.
futurists.
o7
I don't think Netherland will be on the same side as Poland. Everybody was though about only 2 alliance, but a tripolar world is also possible. But still, I think that most A3 will join A1 if they have the choice to do it.
If i were the Netherlands i'd go with Serbia for sure.
Turkey choice between their "orthodox brothers" (Serbia + hellas) and Poland + muslim countries 😃
popcorn!!!
but...i think that hellas made their choice to join Croatia
There are some strong countries in A3 and I think that A1/A2 countries will try to win them on their side. My guess is, A3 won't make it as an alliance but the countries will disperse in A1/A2. And it will be painful :/
Give me some hints.. which countries do you think may join A1/A2 from the third alliance? 🙂
popcorn mode!!! 😃
I think some of those countries can be switched around depending on the next couple days.
voted. Interesting ideas. Most will likely be accurate, with exception to perhaps a few nations. o7
boated
bookmarked...
You've done a great job of summarizing the international picture. I hope you keep it updated as you get more information.
not a waste of time by reading this article, my vote.
Interesting article.
I believe Greece priority will be staying with Turkey which would lead them into the Polish sphere of influence.
Romania and Hungary might both end up with Serbia. Let's see what's gonna happen there. Something tells me the old EDEN might be back together 🙂
Argentina is also a question mark for me. Hopefully, they will be able to sort their differences with Chile and form a South American alliance.
Looks like Serbia will very soon end up surrounded by enemies. Definitely no more 10/10 bonuses for them.
Interesting layout. I'm not sure about the third sphere forming. I have a feeling Spoland and Serbia will be recruiting hard among those nations, as they look for other nations to fight their opponents for them and protect their resources.
A third significant alliance would be interesting, but pretty much anything is better than just having TWO around.
Greece in the 2nd sphere, you sure? Dropping their Hungarian MPP suggests they mean to join up with the A1 alliance. If they do I think that will mean a merge between many of the A2 and A3 nations.
V
I think so, yes... Not only because of their last MPP laws, but because I think that they would much rather stay with Serbia, Romania and Argentina than with Croatia. Also, I believe Turkey might join in, so the greeks will choose A2 before A1 (where Hungary could join/or A3/ as of Romania not leaving Serbia in A2)
A lot of fail choices. Read official statements first.
Hopefully he can get some feedback, and make corrections.
I'm glad someone is making the attempt to paint what the international picture looks like. It would be nice to have an updated summary to reference.
Good analysis, pretty much spot on. Alliance 3 looks underpowered and might need a few common MPPs from Alliance 1 and 2.
There is one other situation where perhaps it could be South America leading one of the main alliances... Chile/Arg with Brasil/Mexico?
Yes, exactly what I ment. There would be quite some common MPPs between the third alliance and the first two, so it wouldn't look so underpowered - like Chilean, Bulgarian, Indonesian with some particular countries 😁 , but that could happen if it's tripolar and not bipolar.
Albania and Belarus into an alliance! neverrrrr
Belarus is puppet of serbia , and has no place in our alliance .
It's about sphere of influence, not exactly an alliance, but for the current standings I believe they belong in that particular sphere. You can disagree if you want ofc 🙂
Filthy Croatian Traitors, is there any country in the world that havent recieved croatian knife in the back 😛
OK. lets be serious.
Nice analysis, but still far far from finshed.
Voted.
option 3 is much much more likely to happen than option 2!
China is pro-nothing they will stay neutral.
Well, they have MPPs with countries from Sphere 1 and 2, so they can't be neutral in that case 🙂 It's not about alliances, it's about spheres of influence
Have you ever tried sleeping with a broken heart?
nice analyzing 😉
50% for tripolar world? For me its 5% or less. Maybe we will now just change balance of two sides more dinamicly, but your dream about 1v2v3 isnt likely to happen.
Yep, maybe it's likely not to happen, but still there's a chance. It's all possible now 🙂
Please don't rebuild CoT ( aka option 3 ) 😁
Пфууу,
Върви удари една ОРАЛНА Тутурутка на СПоланд.
.
ORAL NAP???
Ко? Не!
Is there any list of alliances nowadays or, more simply, of 'who likes/dislikes who, and why?' I'd certainly use it...
I think there was a canadian article about that matter o/
Can you give me a link to it in PM, please? 🙂
Sorry, couldn't find it.
Nice analysis
but manythings may change in future
Greece rejected our MPP first
And you rejected the Macedonian one, because fuck logic
I think that your shots are far away from truth o/
1406 s