Pro-Asteria betrayal. Chile and its new allies.
Day 2,936, 21:38
•
Published in Serbia 
•
by
•
by ONLY MONEY
How does the dictionary define betrayal?
Offense made upon breaking the fidelity and loyalty that should be kept.
In this increasingly decayed game, many alliances have been formed. But, just as Rome, some have fallen down from high above. No wonder, since most of the time, they form out of convenience.
Though, within this convenience, these bondings appear, friends unite, loyalty shapes; nevertheless, feud grows at times,envy damages relationships, and loyalty gets disrupted.
This happens in two countries in Australia. As we all know, New Zealand changed sides not long ago (even thoug they deny it), giving support to Spain and launching NE so as not to be kicked out of South America, right in the middle of the war against Chile.
We can see a bit of this situation in EBM’s articles:
About conflict between Peru and NZ
Sobre nuestros vecinos no aliados
The betrayal from this side of the hemisphere was more than evident, and just when we thought that current eChile could not get more allies nearby, a Pro-Asteria country was stabbed from behind.
Let’s see that country’s MPPs.
Can we guess who this is?
If you haven’t guessed, it’s no wonder, because …which country with so many Pro-Asteria and Asteria MPPs would betray the Alliance?
A few days ago we saw this announcement:
[MOFA] TRAINING WAR CON AUSTRALIA, NOVIEMBRE 2015
Any gulible person who read that, would not have had any inconvenience. But if we took a closer look at the map, we could watch this
EXACTLY!
It was more tan evident that they would attack the US. But, who can prevent one country from attacking another? And worse yet, if it’s an enemy, …right?
In effect, for such a thing to happen, they should make a lot of damage or have excellent external relations.
But this is not the case. If some Pro-allied country, which belongs to the same Alliance as mine, intentionally lets an enemy pass, it cannot be considered as anything else but betrayal.
Unfortunately, this is Australia’s case, who preferred to make a good impression on eChile, rather tan staying faithful to the Alliance.
Australia and New Zealand have chosen.
WHAT WILL PRO-ASTERIA AND ASTERIA COUNTRIES CHOOSE?
Will there be consequences?
I let it up to you.
Translation
xxDISTURBEDxx
Offense made upon breaking the fidelity and loyalty that should be kept.
In this increasingly decayed game, many alliances have been formed. But, just as Rome, some have fallen down from high above. No wonder, since most of the time, they form out of convenience.
Though, within this convenience, these bondings appear, friends unite, loyalty shapes; nevertheless, feud grows at times,envy damages relationships, and loyalty gets disrupted.
This happens in two countries in Australia. As we all know, New Zealand changed sides not long ago (even thoug they deny it), giving support to Spain and launching NE so as not to be kicked out of South America, right in the middle of the war against Chile.
We can see a bit of this situation in EBM’s articles:
About conflict between Peru and NZ
Sobre nuestros vecinos no aliados
The betrayal from this side of the hemisphere was more than evident, and just when we thought that current eChile could not get more allies nearby, a Pro-Asteria country was stabbed from behind.
Let’s see that country’s MPPs.
Can we guess who this is?
If you haven’t guessed, it’s no wonder, because …which country with so many Pro-Asteria and Asteria MPPs would betray the Alliance?
A few days ago we saw this announcement:
[MOFA] TRAINING WAR CON AUSTRALIA, NOVIEMBRE 2015
Any gulible person who read that, would not have had any inconvenience. But if we took a closer look at the map, we could watch this
EXACTLY!
It was more tan evident that they would attack the US. But, who can prevent one country from attacking another? And worse yet, if it’s an enemy, …right?
In effect, for such a thing to happen, they should make a lot of damage or have excellent external relations.
But this is not the case. If some Pro-allied country, which belongs to the same Alliance as mine, intentionally lets an enemy pass, it cannot be considered as anything else but betrayal.
Unfortunately, this is Australia’s case, who preferred to make a good impression on eChile, rather tan staying faithful to the Alliance.
Australia and New Zealand have chosen.
WHAT WILL PRO-ASTERIA AND ASTERIA COUNTRIES CHOOSE?
Will there be consequences?
I let it up to you.
Translation
xxDISTURBEDxx
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
From your US release:
What I find funny is a Peruivan talking about betrayal... yet Peru still owes us rent, some of their politicians originally threatened to wipe us unless we signed a region rent with them, some of their politicians supported Hitman when he tried to AS Australia. They forced their rental deals onto New Zealand.
And about us betraying USA? Considering we have always had close contact with the US, we signed a MPP with them (one that was originally going to be signed months ago), we have always had open lines of communication about what is happening in our regions, our CoD is set for the US battle, Once Chile proposed NE on the US, Wild Owl and myself have been discussing it, the fact we have had an immigration boost from USA citizens....
I really wish Peru would just move on from the past like we have... but I guess some Peruvians will always feel hurt.
And note they never paid NZ rent either.
USA is the enemy of Serbia
:genius:
RAFAEL, you miss read it... Apparently Australia (Nebula/Asteria) and NZ (who is not aligned to anyone) are the big evil empire trying to destabilize the entire eWorld through our massive military might.... end sarcasm. But you must admit it is a funny article by Peru
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/have-a-chance-at-winning-dead-space-2-for-origin--2569049/1/20
Try your luck doesnt cost a dime!😉
Giving out Dead Space 2 for origin!