Not divisive but assertive
Day 1,986, 15:53
•
Published in United Kingdom 
•
by
•
by Alphabethis
Divisive politics, desire for power, personal attacks, unfairness, maturity, political enemies... You have probably heard all these terms and most likely, under our current data, you are a late teenager, early tweenties player, so the way you handle all this stuff is ... different from the actual (?) and real stuff.
I think it's completely unfair to ask everybody a grown-up personality, even for some in the 40s. If, by age or by fate, you are unmature, you should be respected as such. In any case, whenever we criticize that implies:
a) we are doing a constructive critic, providing an alternative. So not all critic or critic itself is bad.
b) It's true that we fight "around" power, not for power, New Era has enjoyed little power, we have supported UKPP, ONE VISION to give a chance to an alternative, to try to get a better situation of our pitiful stance of dependence of allies ( Poland , mainly) and small population. New Era is not power greed. We don't offer "power" to our new or old players, till, we'd love to share a bit of the current power, granted by the grace of God to TUP, specially in Foreign Affairs.
c) Personal attacks. That shouldn't happen ever, but it happens. My opinion is that, with so many teenagers around, and young people, words flow easily... Anyway, logic and reason should prevail over hormones.
d) Politics. In fact politics is just that set of actions that have an impact on the welfare of the community (e-country in this case). So criticism is a must for a responsible member of the community. New Era is happy to have some of the brightest brains in eUK, and this is the whole point of New Era, bring new ideas TO IMPROVE the mess caused by years of young and reckless management.
So, basically, we have two sides in eUK:
a) the one that let the same rulers rule. They have been ruling for three years to no avail. This side has a core (TUP) and several supporters (dolphins or puppets, named thus because they're secondary in their views, share of power and, mostly , in their IDEAS). (remember that politics = IDEAS )
b) the ones that will eventually will win the place eUK deserves in the eWorld, let's say a decent top 10. How ? Improving, testing, questioning the current stablishment and its pests...
Do not hesitate to give your opinion and your ideas. Yours are not worse than other people's.
New era Wiki our constructivism starts here.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
I have no idea what point you were trying to make here.
I think it's something to do with getting 'oldfags' out and getting real life oldfags in...
SEXAGENARIAN4CP!
Still no apology for abusing a one day old player
The way I see it we have two sides in the UK.
1) Everyone who wants the best for the Uk and who want to have fun.
2) New Era who attack everyone who leaves the party, slanders all who are in other parties and just genrally make the UK a depressing and un fun environment.
who has attacked you ? Not me, for sure.
I was accused of sniping the new player from NE, despite not knowing who she was.
most of the New era members fit into number 1
it is just a few of the more experienced members are a little too,,, competitive shall we say
[removed]
'New Era has enjoyed little power, we have supported UKPP, ONE VISION'.
Ok well you supported 1V when to be fair and no offence their candidate was never going to win and there was no alternative.
Support UKPP when we had BA in our ranks..... shock!
On the fact of us being dependent on Poland and the rest of TWO then unfortunately you getting one term of CP is not going to change that.
we supported UKPP a lots of time, UKPP never supported us. FACTS.
You supported UKPP for one reason and one reason only. To have bargaining power for when the time comes for a New Era CP run. Evidenced by the major baw you guys kicked up when rather than supporting Alfagrem (your preferred CP candidate), UKPP supported a player from within it's own ranks...
FACTS...